Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prediction and management of a low-lying costal arch which restricts the operative working space during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background/purpose

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is difficult to perform in patients with a low-lying costal arch that entirely covers the liver. We conducted this study to clarify the factors related to a low-lying costal arch and establish countermeasures to circumvent this characteristic.

Methods

The study included 103 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The possible clinical factors associated with a low-lying costal arch restricting the operative working space were analyzed. The position of the liver against the costal arch and the presumed surgical visual angle for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comprising the hepatic porta, umbilicus, and costal arch, were estimated with abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

Results

Seven (7%) patients had a low-lying costal arch presenting an inadequate exposure of Calot’s triangle and restricted instrument mobility during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and three patients required conversion to a laparotomy. A low-lying costal arch was significantly associated with advanced age, shorter stature, lighter body weight, coexisting kyphoscoliosis, gallbladder pathology, laparotomy conversion, and most of all, the liver edge lying above the costal arch and a narrow surgical visual angle upon MDCT. Of the seven patients with a critical low-lying costal arch, four underwent a successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, this being done by lifting the right costal arch to create a workable surgical field; the rib-lifting procedure was planned as part of the scheduled procedure in the other three patients because the preoperative MDCT examination indicated a poor working space for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Conclusions

A low-lying costal arch is a substantial risk factor for conversion to a laparotomy when performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the operative difficulty related to a low-lying costal arch can be predicted by using preoperative MDCT images and can be managed with proper planning and the appropriate use of the rib-lifting technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Maheshkumar GS. Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:608–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soleimani M, Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, Kashfi A, Büchler MW, et al. Partial cholecystectomy as a safe and viable option in the emergency treatment of complex acute cholecystitis: a case series and review of the literature. Am Surg. 2007;73:498–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang CM, Choi GH, Park SH, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy only could be an appropriate treatment for selected clinical R0 gallbladder carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1582–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Symeonidis N, Psarras K, Ballas K, Rafailidis S, et al. Considerations concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Annamaneni RK, Moraitis D, Cayten CG. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. JSLS. 2005;9:408–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ. Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:700–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins PJ, Paterson HM, Parks RW, Garden OJ. Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1382–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chowbey PK, Panse R, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis with severe spinal deformity. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15:234–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sampath R, Raychaudhuri B, Sahai A, Scott H, Dasgupta P. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis: surgical and anesthetic challenges. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17:223–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Tsuneoka N, Adachi T, Kanematsu T. Rib lifting method for the retraction of the low-lying costal arch in laparoscopic cholecystectomy of gallbladder torsion with kyphoscoliosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1268–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tarhan OR, Barut I, Dinelek H. Gallbladder volvulus: review of the literature and report of a case. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2006;17:209–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiow AK, Ibrahim S, Tay KH. Torsion of the gallbladder: a rare entity. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007;36:705–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stieber AC, Bauer JJ. Volvulus of the gallbladder. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78:96–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McHenry CR, Byrne MP. Gallbladder volvulus in the elderly. An emergent surgical disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986;34:137–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Losken A, Wilson BW, Sherman R. Torsion of the gallbladder: a case report and review of the literature. Am Surg. 1997;63:975–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B. Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2435–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan

    Yoshitsugu Tajima, Tamotsu Kuroki, Amane Kitasato, Tomohiko Adachi, Taiichiro Kosaka, Tatsuya Okamoto, Fumihiko Fujita, Kengo Kanetaka, Seiya Susumu, Satoshi Mochizuki, Yasuhiro Torashima & Takashi Kanematsu

Authors
  1. Yoshitsugu Tajima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamotsu Kuroki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amane Kitasato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomohiko Adachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Taiichiro Kosaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tatsuya Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fumihiko Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kengo Kanetaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seiya Susumu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Satoshi Mochizuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yasuhiro Torashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Takashi Kanematsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitsugu Tajima.

About this article

Cite this article

Tajima, Y., Kuroki, T., Kitasato, A. et al. Prediction and management of a low-lying costal arch which restricts the operative working space during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 60–66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0309-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0309-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation