Skip to main content
Log in

Biliary reconstruction with wide-interval interrupted suture to prevent biliary complications in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation

  • Review article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Liver transplantation is an established therapy for children with end-stage chronic liver disease or acute liver failure. However, despite refinements of surgical techniques for liver transplantation, the incidence of biliary tract complications has remained high in recent years. Therefore, we suggest our anastomotic technique with wide-interval interrupted suture to prevent biliary complications in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

Forty-nine LDLTs were performed on 49 pediatric recipients with end-stage liver disease. Biliary reconstruction was performed using a 2.5× magnifying surgical loupe, via end bile duct to side Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (n = 47) and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy (n = 2) with an external stent. A stay suture with 6-0 absorbable materials was placed at each end of the anastomotic orifice. Two interrupted sutures of the posterior row were performed. After completion of the suture of the posterior row, an external transanastomotic stent tube was inserted into the intrahepatic bile duct and was fixed with posterior row material. Finally, two interrupted sutures of the anterior wall were performed, totaling six stitches. The transanastomotic stent tube emerging out of the blind end of the Roux-en-Y limb was covered with a round ligament and was usually left in place for 1 month after the operation.

Results

The median follow-up period was 58.0 months (range 8–135 months). In 33 recipients, the bile duct was used to perform the reconstruction with a single lumen. In 5 cases, there were 2 bile ducts that were formed to enable a single anastomosis. In 10 cases, there were 2 separated ducts and each duct was anastomosed with the recipient jejunum. In one case, there were 3 ducts that were formed to enable two anastomoses. Twenty-two percent of the living-donor grafts required 2 biliary anastomoses. Forty-four patients (89.8%) are alive (ranging from 8 months to 11 years), and 5 patients have died. Two patients had biliary complications, an anastomotic stricture in one (2.0%) and bile leakage in one. There were no complications due to anastomotic tubes.

Conclusions

Biliary reconstruction with wide-interval interrupted suture prevents anastomotic strictures and bile leakage in pediatric LDLT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salvalaggio PR, Whitington PF, Alonso EM, Superina RA. Presence of multiple bile ducts in the liver graft increases the incidence of biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Azoulay D, Marin-Hargreaves G, Castaing D, Adam R, Bismuth H. Duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in living related liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 2001;136:1197–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qian YB, Liu CL, Lo CM, Fan ST. Risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gondolesi GE, Varotti G, Florman SS, Munouz L, Fishbein TM, Emre SH, et al. Biliary complications in 96 consecutive right lobe living donor transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2004;77:1842–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schindel D, Dunn S, Casa A, Billmire D, Vincour C, Weintraub W. Characterization and treatment of biliary anastomotic stricture after segmental liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:940–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calne RY. A new technique for biliary drainage in orthotopic liver transplantation utilizing the gall bladder as a pediatric graft conduit between the donor and recipient common bile ducts. Ann Surg. 1976;184:605–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasahara M, Egawa H, Takada Y, Oike F, Sakamoto S, Kiuchi T, et al. Biliary reconstruction in right lobe living-donor liver transplantation: comparison of different techniques in 321 recipients. Ann Surg. 2006;243:559–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Venu M, Brown RD, Lepe R, Berkes J, Cotler SJ, Benedetti E, Testa G, Venu RP. Laboratory diagnosis and nonoperative management of biliary complications in living donor liver transplant patients. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:501–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang S, Lee SG, Sung KB, Park KM, Kim KH, Ahn CS, et al. Long-term incidence, risk factors, and management of biliary complications after adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:831–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Egawa H, Uemoto S, Inomata Y, Shapiro AM, Asonuma K, Kiuchi T, et al. Biliary complications in pediatric living related liver transplantation. Surgery. 1998;124:901–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gridelli B, Spada M, Petz W, Bertani A, Lucianetti A, Colledan M, et al. Split-liver transplantation eliminates the need for living-donor liver transplantation in children with end-stage cholestatic liver disease. Transplantation. 2003;75:1197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heffron TG, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Stevens L, Piper J, et al. Biliary complication in pediatric liver transplantation: a comparison of reduced-size and whole grafts. Transplantation. 1992;53:391–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lie CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Operative outcomes of adult-to adult right lobe liver donor liver transplantation: a comparative study with cadaveric whole-graft liver transplantation in a single center. Ann Surg. 2004;243:404–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Baker AL, Lichtor JL. Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg. 1990;212:368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tashiro H, Itamoto T, Sasaki T, Ohdan H, Fudaba Y, Amano H, et al. Biliary complications after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation: causes and treatment. World J Surg. 2007;31:2222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan L, Li B, Zeng Y, Wen T, Zhao J, Wang W, et al. Introduction of microsurgical technique to biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:1513–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chuang JH, Lee SY, Chen WJ, Hsieh CS, Chang NK, Lo SK. Changes in bacterial concentration in the liver correlate with that in the hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct reconstruction: implication in the pathogenesis of postoperative cholangitis. World J Surg. 2001;25:1512–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hisatune H, Yazumi S, Egawa H, Asada M, Hasegawa K, Kodama Y, et al. Endoscopic management of biliary strictures after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;31:864–71.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma S, Gurakar A, Jabbour N. Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:759–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirouzu Y, Okajima H, Ogata S, Ohya Y, Tsukamoto Y, Yamamoto H, et al. Biliary reconstruction for infantile living donor liver transplantation: Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy? Liver Transplant. 2008;14:1761–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Soejima Y, Taketomi A, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Harada N, Ijichi H, et al. Biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation: incidence, management, and technical evolution. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:979–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noack K, Bronk SF, Kato A, Gores GJ. The greater vulnerability of bile-duct cells to reoxygenation injury than to anoxia. Implications for the pathogenesis of biliary strictures after liver-transplantation. Transplantation. 1993;56:495–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcos A, Ham JM, Fisher RA, Olzinski AT, Posner MP. Surgical management of anatomical variations of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2000;231:824–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scatton O, Meunier B, Cherqui D, Boillot O, Sauvanet A, Boudjema K, et al. Randomized trial of choledochocholedochostomy with or without a T tube in orthotopic liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2001;233:432–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kling K, Lau H, Colombani P. Biliary complications of living related pediatric liver transplant patients. Pediatr Transplant. 2004;8:178–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdonk RC, Buis CI, Porte RJ, Jagt EJ, Limburg AJ, Berg AP, et al. Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: causes and consequences. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:726–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhatnagar A, Dhawan H, Chaer P, Muiesan M, Rela AP, Mowat R, et al. The incidence and management of biliary complications following liver transplantation in children. Transpl Int. 1995;8:388–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hisami Ando.

About this article

Cite this article

Ando, H., Kaneko, K., Ono, Y. et al. Biliary reconstruction with wide-interval interrupted suture to prevent biliary complications in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 26–31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0301-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-010-0301-5

Keywords

Navigation