Skip to main content
Log in

Falciform ligament in pancreatoduodenectomy for protection of skeletonized and divided vessels

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/purpose

Pancreatic fistula, which is one of the main causes of late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), is a common complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). It may erode the anastomosis site and vascular wall in its vicinity, resulting in pseudoaneurysm formation and/or the rupture of major vessels. To protect the vessels near the area for pancreaticojejunostomy from potential pancreatic fistula, we have adopted a surgical option by which such vessels are separated from the pancreaticojejunostomy using a pedicled falciform ligament. We reviewed 36 patients who underwent PD that included this option.

Methods

After the PD was completed (before reconstructions), the pedicled falciform ligament was spread widely on the major vessels exposed during resection, and was fixed to the surrounding retroperitoneal connective tissue. These procedures enabled the complete separation of these vessels from the pancreaticojejunostomy.

Results

The mobilization and placement of the falciform ligament in the space between the pancreaticojejunostomy and the major vessels were successfully carried out without any complications. Although ten (28%) patients developed pancreatic fistula and three (8%) developed intraabdominal infection, none of the patients developed late PPH.

Conclusions

The present surgical option is technically simple and easy, and may be an effective prophylactic measure against late PPH following PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:951–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI. Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurosaki I, Hatakeyama K. Omental wrapping of skeletonized major vessels after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int Surg. 2004;89:90–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moriura S, Ikeda S, Ikezawa T, Naiki K. The inclusion of an omental flap in pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Today. 1994;24:940–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seyama Y, Kubota K, Kobayashi T, Hirata Y, Itoh A, et al. Two-staged pancreatoduodenectomy with external drainage of pancreatic juice and omental graft technique. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:103–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maeda A, Ebata T, Kanemoto H, Matsunaga K, Bando E, et al. Omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy for protection of splanchnic vessels. World J Surg. 2005;29:1122–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abe N, Sugiyama M, Yanagida O, Masaki T, Mori T, et al. Wrapping of skeletonized and divided vessels using the falciform ligament in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;41:472–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer RP, Gervin AS. The use of falciform ligament in the repair of hepatic injuries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161:383–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugiyama M, Abe N, Ueki H, Masaki T, Mori T, et al. A new reconstruction method for preventing delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;187:743–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G, Reber HA. Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140:849–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)–an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990 s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA, Nagorney DM, McIlrath DC, et al. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg. 1992;127:945–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rumstadt B, Schwab M, Korth P, Samman M, Trede M. Hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1998;227:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Morii Y, Aramaki M, Bandoh T, et al. Delayed massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Int Surg. 1998;83:131–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Chen YS, Chen MC, Chen CL. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:477–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bottger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg. 1999;23:164–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zerbi A, Balzano G, Patuzzo R, Calori G, Braga M, et al. Comparison between pylorus-preserving and Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 1995;82:975–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allema JH, Reinders ME, van Gulik TM, van Leeuwen DJ, Verbeek PC, et al. Results of pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma and analysis of prognostic factors for survival. Surgery. 1995;17:247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu S, Morisaki T, Yokohata K, et al. Coil embolization of bleeding visceral pseudoaneurysms following pancreatectomy: the importance of early angiography. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1099–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shankar S, Russell RC. Haemorrhage in pancreatic disease. Br J Surg. 1989;76:863–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aranha GV, O`Neil S, Borge MA. Successful nonoperative management of bleeding heopatic artery pseudoaneurysm following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 1999;16:528–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Costalat G, Alquier Y. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH). Surg Endosc. 1995;9:677–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Helsdingen CF. Hiatal herniorrhaphy with posterior gastropexy utilizing the ligamentum teres hepatis. Int Surg. 1968;50:128–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baker RJ, Fischer SK, Lillemoe KL. Mastery of surgery. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1313.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobutsugu Abe.

About this article

Cite this article

Abe, N., Sugiyama, M., Suzuki, Y. et al. Falciform ligament in pancreatoduodenectomy for protection of skeletonized and divided vessels. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16, 184–188 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0036-8

Keywords

Navigation