Abstract
Background/purpose
Graft survival is affected by various factors, such as preoperative state and the ages of the recipient and donor, as well as graft size. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors for graft survival.
Methods
From September 1997 to July 2005, 24 patients who had undergone living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were retrospectively analyzed. Sixteen patients survived and the eight graft-loss cases were classified into two groups according to the cause of graft loss: graft dysfunction without major post-transplantation complications (graft dysfunction group; n = 3), and graft dysfunction with such complications (secondary graft dysfunction group; n = 5). Various factors were compared between these groups and the survival group.
Results
Mean donor age was 31.9 years in the survival group and 49.2 years in the secondary graft dysfunction group (P = 0.024). Graft weight/recipient standard liver volume ratios (G/SLVs) were 36.7% in the survival group, and 26.2% in the graft dysfunction group (P = 0.037). The postoperative mean PT% for 1 week was 48.6% in the survival group and 38.1% in the secondary graft dysfunction group (P = 0.05).
Conclusions
Our surgical results demonstrated that G/SLV and donor age were independent factors that affected graft survival rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H, Ikegami T, Nakazawa Y, et al. Successful living related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet. 1994;343:1233–4.
Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, et al. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999;67:321–7.
Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2605–10.
Taniguchi M, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Yamashita K, Oura T, Watanabe M, et al. Transient portacaval shunt for small-for-size graft in living donor transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:932–4.
Sakamoto S, Umemoto K, Uryuhara K, Kim IL, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, et al. Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor transplantation using right lobe. Transplantation. 2001;71:1407–13.
Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami Y, Nakazawa Y, et al. Living related liver transplantation in adults. Ann Surg. 1998;227:269–74.
Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi H, et al. Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2001;233:577–80.
Rasia S, Nery JR, Mies S. Liver transplantation from live donors. Lancet. 1989;21:497.
Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TN. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1505–7.
Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Chan JK, Lam BK, Lau GK, et al. Minimum graft size for successful living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1999;68:1112–6.
Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Kaneko J, Kokudo N. MELD score for selection of patients to receive a left liver graft. Transplantation. 2003;75:573–4.
Soejima Y, Takehito A, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Harada N, Ijichi H, et al. Feasibility of left lobe living donor liver transplantation between adults: an 8-year, single-center experience of 107 cases. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1004–11.
Ikegami T, Nishizaki T, Yanaga K, Shimada M, Kishikawa K, Nomoto K, et al. The impact of donor age on living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;70:1703–7.
Yoshizumi T, Takehito A, Soejima Y, Uchiyama H, Ikegami T, Harada N, et al. Impact of donor age and recipient status on left-lobe graft for living donor adult liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2008;21:81–8.
Soejima Y, Shimada M, Suehiro T, Hiroshige S, Ninomiya M, Shiotani S, et al. Outcome analysis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:581–6.
Salleh I, Chao-Long C, Chih-Chi W, Shih-Ho W, Chih-Che L, Yeuh-Wei L, et al. Small remnant liver volume after right lobe living donor hepatecomy. Surgery. 2006;140:749–55.
Takada Y, Ueda M, Ishikawa Y, Fujimoto Y, Miyauchi H, Ogura Y, et al. End-to-side portocaval shunting for small-for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:807–10.
Yagi S, Iida T, Hori T, Taniguchi K, Yamamoto C, Yamagiwa K, et al. Optimal portal venous circulation for liver graft function after living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:373–8.
Ignazio RM, Howard RD, Luca A, Cataldo D, John M, Timothy G, et al. Effect of donor age and sex on the outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1995;22:1754–62.
Marsman W, Wiesner R, Rodriguez L, Batts K, Porayko M, Hay J, et al. Use of fatty donor liver is associated with diminished early patient and graft survival. Transplantation. 1996;62:1246–51.
Adam R, Reynes M, Johann M, Morino M, Astarcioglu I, Kafetzis I, et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1538–40.
Alexander J, Vaughn W, Carev M. The use of marginal donors for organ transplantation: the older and younger donors. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:905–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Katsuragawa, H., Yamamoto, M., Katagiri, S. et al. Graft size and donor age are independent factors for graft loss in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation using the left liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16, 178–183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0026-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0026-x