Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Graft size and donor age are independent factors for graft loss in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation using the left liver

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/purpose

Graft survival is affected by various factors, such as preoperative state and the ages of the recipient and donor, as well as graft size. The objective of this study was to analyze the risk factors for graft survival.

Methods

From September 1997 to July 2005, 24 patients who had undergone living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were retrospectively analyzed. Sixteen patients survived and the eight graft-loss cases were classified into two groups according to the cause of graft loss: graft dysfunction without major post-transplantation complications (graft dysfunction group; = 3), and graft dysfunction with such complications (secondary graft dysfunction group; = 5). Various factors were compared between these groups and the survival group.

Results

Mean donor age was 31.9 years in the survival group and 49.2 years in the secondary graft dysfunction group (= 0.024). Graft weight/recipient standard liver volume ratios (G/SLVs) were 36.7% in the survival group, and 26.2% in the graft dysfunction group (= 0.037). The postoperative mean PT% for 1 week was 48.6% in the survival group and 38.1% in the secondary graft dysfunction group (= 0.05).

Conclusions

Our surgical results demonstrated that G/SLV and donor age were independent factors that affected graft survival rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H, Ikegami T, Nakazawa Y, et al. Successful living related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. Lancet. 1994;343:1233–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, et al. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999;67:321–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2605–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taniguchi M, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Yamashita K, Oura T, Watanabe M, et al. Transient portacaval shunt for small-for-size graft in living donor transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:932–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakamoto S, Umemoto K, Uryuhara K, Kim IL, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, et al. Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor transplantation using right lobe. Transplantation. 2001;71:1407–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami Y, Nakazawa Y, et al. Living related liver transplantation in adults. Ann Surg. 1998;227:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi H, et al. Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2001;233:577–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasia S, Nery JR, Mies S. Liver transplantation from live donors. Lancet. 1989;21:497.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TN. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1505–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Chan JK, Lam BK, Lau GK, et al. Minimum graft size for successful living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1999;68:1112–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Kaneko J, Kokudo N. MELD score for selection of patients to receive a left liver graft. Transplantation. 2003;75:573–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soejima Y, Takehito A, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Harada N, Ijichi H, et al. Feasibility of left lobe living donor liver transplantation between adults: an 8-year, single-center experience of 107 cases. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1004–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikegami T, Nishizaki T, Yanaga K, Shimada M, Kishikawa K, Nomoto K, et al. The impact of donor age on living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;70:1703–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshizumi T, Takehito A, Soejima Y, Uchiyama H, Ikegami T, Harada N, et al. Impact of donor age and recipient status on left-lobe graft for living donor adult liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2008;21:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soejima Y, Shimada M, Suehiro T, Hiroshige S, Ninomiya M, Shiotani S, et al. Outcome analysis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:581–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salleh I, Chao-Long C, Chih-Chi W, Shih-Ho W, Chih-Che L, Yeuh-Wei L, et al. Small remnant liver volume after right lobe living donor hepatecomy. Surgery. 2006;140:749–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takada Y, Ueda M, Ishikawa Y, Fujimoto Y, Miyauchi H, Ogura Y, et al. End-to-side portocaval shunting for small-for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:807–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yagi S, Iida T, Hori T, Taniguchi K, Yamamoto C, Yamagiwa K, et al. Optimal portal venous circulation for liver graft function after living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:373–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ignazio RM, Howard RD, Luca A, Cataldo D, John M, Timothy G, et al. Effect of donor age and sex on the outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1995;22:1754–62.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marsman W, Wiesner R, Rodriguez L, Batts K, Porayko M, Hay J, et al. Use of fatty donor liver is associated with diminished early patient and graft survival. Transplantation. 1996;62:1246–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Adam R, Reynes M, Johann M, Morino M, Astarcioglu I, Kafetzis I, et al. The outcome of steatotic grafts in liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:1538–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander J, Vaughn W, Carev M. The use of marginal donors for organ transplantation: the older and younger donors. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:905–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Katsuragawa.

About this article

Cite this article

Katsuragawa, H., Yamamoto, M., Katagiri, S. et al. Graft size and donor age are independent factors for graft loss in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation using the left liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16, 178–183 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0026-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-008-0026-x

Keywords

Navigation