Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of microvessels in pancreatic cancer: by light microscopy, confocal laser scan microscopy, and electron microscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/Purpose

The microvessel density (MVD) of most malignant tumors is considered to be strongly related to metastasis and prognosis. Weidner’s “hot spot method” for determining MVD is in general use, but it is possible that cells other than endothelial cells will also be stained. In our previous study, no correlations were observed between MVD determined by the “hot spot method” and prognosis/metastasis. But, using the “lumen method,” we found a correlation with the number of vessel structures only. In the present study, we analyzed the staining of microvessels in pancreatic cancer, using light microscopy, confocal laser scan microscopy (CLSM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Methods

Microvessel staining of pancreatic cancer with CD34, factor VIII, and CD45 antibodies was examined in consecutive slices by light microscopy. For CLSM, freshly resected specimens were immunostained with factor VIII and fluorescein isothiocynate. For TEM, specimens were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, treated with 1% osmium tetroxide, and embedded in epoxy resin.

Results

Staining of vessels with CD34 and factor VIII antibodies appeared similar under light microscopy. However, CD34-stained consecutive slices were judged not to reveal vessel structures, and some cells stained with CD45 antibody were similar in appearance to CD34-stained cells. Under CLSM, irregular arrangements of neovascularization, consisting of many branches, were observed, but many positively stained cells not identified as vessels were also seen. Microvessels were distinctly identified under TEM, but the types of individual cells could not be determined.

Conclusions

An integrated, reproducible method for the measurement of MVD is vital. For pancreatic cancer, the “lumen method” is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weidner N, Semple J, Welich W, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Viecent-Salomon A, Carton M, Zafrani B, Freneaux P, Nicolas A, Massemin B, et al. Long term outcome of small size invasive breast carcinomas independent from angiogenesis in a series of 685 cases. Cancer 2001;92:249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee JS, Kim HS, Jung JJ, Kim YB, Park CS, Lee MC. Correlation between angiogenesis, apoptosis and cell proliferation in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and their relation to tumor behavior. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2001;23:161–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunel N, Akcali Z, Coskum U, Akyol G, Yamac D, Yenidunya S. Prognostic importance of tumor angiogenesis in breast carcinoma with adjuvant chemotherapy. Pathol Res Pract 2002;198:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guidi AJ, Berry DA, Broadwater G, Helmchen B, Bleiweiss IJ, Budman DR, et al. Association of angiogenesis and disease outcome in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Correlative Science Study From Protocols 8541/8869. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:732–742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bossi P, Viale G, Lee A, Alfano RM, Coggi G, Bosari S. Angiogenesis in colorectal tumors: microvessel quantitation in adenomas and carcinomas with clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Res 1995;55:5049–5053.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox SH, Whalen GF, Sanders MM, Burleson JA, Jennings K, Kurtzman S, et al. Angiogenesis in normal tissue adjacent to colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 1998;69:230–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weidner N, Folkman J. Tumor vascularity as a prognostic factor in cancer. Adv Oncol 1996, 167–190.

  9. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Toi M, Martin L, McCulloch P, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumors: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:2474–2484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uzzan B, Nicolas P, Cucherat M, Perret GY. Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in women with breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cancer Res 2004;64:2941–2955.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall NR, Fish DE, Hunt N, Goldin RD, Guillou PJ, Monson RT. Is the relationship between angiogenesis and metastasis in breast cancer real? Surg Oncol 1992;1:223–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Takagi K, Takada T, Amano H. A high peripheral microvessel density count correlates with a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol 2005;40:402–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1182–1186.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Folkman J. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1757–1763.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis LM, Takahashi Y, Fenoglio CJ, Cleary KR, Bucana CD, Evans DB. Vessel counts and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:337–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karademir S, Sokmen S, Terzi C, Sagol O, Ozer E, Astarcioglu H, et al. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:489–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujioka S, Yoshida K, Yanagisawa S, Kawakami M, Aoki T, Yamazaki Y. Angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92:1788–1797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Niedergethmann M, Hildenbrand R, Wostbrock B, Hartel M, Sturm JW, Richter A, et al. High expression of vascular endothelial growth factor predicts early recurrence and poor prognosis after curative resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Pancreas 2002;25:122–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujimoto K, Hosotani R, Wada M, Lee JU, Koshiba T, Miyamoto Y, et al. Expression of two angiogenic factors, vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in human pancreatic cancer, and its relationship to angiogenesis. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:1439–1447.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikeda N, Adachi M, Taki T, Huang C, Hashida H, Takabayashi A, et al. Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in human pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1553–1563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagakawa Y, Aoki T, Kasuya K, Tsuchida A, Koyanagi Y. Histologic features of venous invasion, expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9, and the relation with liver metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2002;24:169–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueda T, Oda T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Nakahashi C, Takahashi S, et al. Neovascularization in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: microvessel count analysis, comparison with noncancerous regions and other types of carcinomas. Oncol Rep 2002;9:239–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo L, Burke P, Lo SH, Gandour-Edwards R, Lau D. Quantitative analysis of angiogenesis using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Angiogenesis 2001;4:187–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Isner J, Asahara T. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis as therapeutic strategies for postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest 1999;103:1231–1236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, et al. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res 1999;85:221–228.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan

    Kenji Takagi, Tadahiro Takada, Hodaka Amano, Masahiro Yoshida, Humihiko Miura, Naoyuki Toyota & Keita Wada

  2. Central Laboratory for Electron Microscopy, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Ichirou Takahashi

Authors
  1. Kenji Takagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tadahiro Takada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hodaka Amano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masahiro Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Humihiko Miura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Naoyuki Toyota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Keita Wada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ichirou Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Takagi, K., Takada, T., Amano, H. et al. Analysis of microvessels in pancreatic cancer: by light microscopy, confocal laser scan microscopy, and electron microscopy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15, 384–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1241-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1241-6

Key words

Search

Navigation