Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on “Dextral transpression and late-Eocene magmatism in the trans-Himalayan Ladakh Batholith (North India): implications for tectono-magmatic evolution of the Indo-Eurasian collisional arc”

  • Discussion
  • Published:
International Journal of Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aitchison JC, Ali JR, Davis AM (2007) When and where did India and Asia collide? J Geophys Res 112:1–19. doi:10.1029/2006JB004706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell BW, White AJR (1974) Two contrasting granite types. Pac Geol 8:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell B, White A (1992) I-and S-type granites in the Lachlan Fold Belt. Trans R Soc Edinb Earth Sci 83:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell B, White A (2001) Two contrasting granite types: 25 years later. Aust J Earth Sci 48:489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins WJ (2002) Hot orogens, tectonic switching, and creation of continental crust. Geology 30:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins WJ, Richards S (2008) Geodynamic significance of S-type granites in circum-Pacific orogens. Geology 36:559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster MA, White LT, Ahmad T (2011) Thermal history of a pebble in the Indus Molasse at the margin of a Himalayan metamorphic core complex. J Virtual Explor 38:1–21. doi:10.3809/jvirtex.2011.00267

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickert RB, Williams IS (2011) U-Pb zircon geochronology of Silurian–Devonian granites in southeastern Australia: implications for the timing of the Benambran Orogeny and the I–S dichotomy. Aust J Earth Sci 58:501–516. doi:10.1080/08120099.2011.562922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister G, Forster MA (2009) Tectonic mode switches and the nature of orogenesis. Lithos 113:274–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson SR, Fowler TK Jr, Schmidt KL et al (1998) Interpreting magmatic fabric patterns in plutons. Lithos 44:53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz U, Honegger K (1989) Magmatic and tectonic evolution of the Ladakh block from field studies. Tectonophysics 161:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland Y, Picard C, Pecher A, Lapierre H (2002) The cretaceous Ladakh arc of NW Himalaya—slab melting and melt–mantle interaction during fast northward drift of Indian plate. Chem Geol 182:139–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle M, Windley B, Coward M (1987) The closing of Tethys and the tectonics of the Himalaya. Geol Soc Am Bull 98:678–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle MP, Cooper D, Rex AJ et al (1988) Collision Tectonics of the Ladakh–Zanskar Himalaya [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc London A 326:117–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen K, Collins AS (2012) Dextral transpression and late Eocene magmatism in the trans-Himalayan Ladakh Batholith (North India): implications for tectono-magmatic evolution of the Indo-Eurasian collisional arc. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch). doi:10.1007/s00531-012-0826-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen K, Mukherjee BK, Sachan HK (2009) Field and microstructural analysis of the Pangong Granodiorite, Ladakh (NW India): implications for tectonics along the Karakoram Fault Zone. Curr Sci 96:1124–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Onge MR, Rayner N, Searle MP (2010) Zircon age determinations for the Ladakh batholith at Chumathang (Northwest India): implications for the age of the India–Asia collision in the Ladakh Himalaya. Tectonophysics 495:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg RF, Dunlap W (2000) Growth and deformation of the Ladakh Batholith, Northwest Himalayas: implications for timing of continental collision and origin of calc-alkaline batholiths. J Geol 108:303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LT, Ahmad T, Ireland TR et al (2011) Deconvolving episodic age spectra from zircons of the Ladakh Batholith, northwest Indian Himalaya. Chem Geol 289:179–196. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LT, Ahmad T, Lister GS et al (2012) Is the switch from I- to S-type magmatism in the Himalayan Orogen indicative of the collision of India and Eurasia? Aust J Earth Sci 59:321–340. doi:10.1080/08120099.2012.652670

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

L. White is financially supported by the SE Asia Research Group through funding provided by a consortium of oil companies. M. Forster acknowledges the support of an Australian Research Fellowship provided by the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lloyd T. White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, L.T., Lister, G.S., Ahmad, T. et al. Comment on “Dextral transpression and late-Eocene magmatism in the trans-Himalayan Ladakh Batholith (North India): implications for tectono-magmatic evolution of the Indo-Eurasian collisional arc”. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 102, 969–972 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0862-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0862-z

Keywords

Navigation