Abstract
A numerical model of a rock sample provides estimates of conductivity related to mineral content that are very close to estimates provided by previous models. For any given volumetric mineral content conductivity may vary slightly, depending on the crystal arrangement and the crystal size. Order of crystallisation of the minerals causes differences of conductivity of less than 2%. Crystal size from small to up to 75% of the sample size creates differences in conductivity of the sample of about 3%. Disagreement of calculated values based on surface point-count of mineral content with measured values of the samples is up to 35%, which is attributed to the inability of one surface to adequately represent the volumetric mineral content.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brailsford AD, Major KG (1964) The thermal conductivity of aggregates of several phases, including porous material. Br J Appl Phys 15:313–319
Hashin Z, Shtrickman S (1962) A variational approach to the theory of effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J Appl Phys 33:3125–3131
Jessop AM (1983) The essential ingredients of a continental heat flow determination. Zbl Geol Palaontol 1:70–79
Jessop AM (1990) Thermal geophysics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 36
Acknowledgments
I acknowledge the Geological Survey of Canada for space and facilities that have helped in this work, Christopher Jessop for many helpful discussions on the logic of programming, John Utting and Glen Stockmal for helpful internal reviews, and Alan Taylor and Trevor Lewis for helpful external reviews.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jessop, A.M. Models of thermal conductivity of crystalline rocks. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 97, 413–419 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-007-0214-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-007-0214-y