Abstract
We study the effective geometric motions of an anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau equation with a small parameter \(\varepsilon >0\) which characterizes the width of the transition layer. For well-prepared initial datum, we show that as \(\varepsilon \) tends to zero the solutions will develop a sharp interface limit which evolves under mean curvature flow. The bulk limits of the solutions correspond to a vector field \({\textbf{u}}(x,t)\) which is of unit length on one side of the interface, and is zero on the other side. The proof combines the modulated energy method and weak convergence methods. In particular, by a (boundary) blow-up argument we show that \({\textbf{u}}\) must be tangent to the sharp interface. Moreover, it solves a geometric evolution equation for the Oseen–Frank model in liquid crystals.

Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a square matrix A, the decomposition \(A=\frac{A+A^{{\textsf{T}}}}{2}+\frac{A-A^{{\textsf{T}}}}{2}\) is orthogonal under the Frobenius inner product \(A:B\triangleq {\text {tr}}(A^{{\textsf{T}}} B)\).
References
Alikakos, N.D., Bates, P.W., Chen, X.: Convergence of the Cahn–Hilliard equation to the Hele–Shaw model. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 128(2), 165–205 (1994)
Ambrosio, L.: A new proof of the SBV compactness theorem. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 3(1), 127–137 (1995)
Ambrosio, L., Fusco, N., Pallara, D.: Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems. Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, New York (2000)
Ambrosio, L., Gigli, N., Savaré, G.: Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Lectures in Mathematics, 2nd edn. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2008)
Ball, J.M.: Mathematics and liquid crystals. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 647(1), 1–27 (2017)
Barles, G., Soner, H.M., Souganidis, P.E.: Front propagation and phase field theory. SIAM J. Control Optim. 31(2), 439–469 (1993)
Brezis, H., Marcus, M.: Hardy’s Inequalities Revisited, vol. 25, pp. 217–237 (1998). 1997. Dedicated to Ennio De Giorgi
Bronsard, L., Stoth, B.: The singular limit of a vector-valued reaction–diffusion process. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350(12), 4931–4953 (1998)
Caffarelli, L.A., Yang, Y.S.: Vortex condensation in the Chern–Simons Higgs model: an existence theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 168(2), 321–336 (1995)
Chapman, S.J., Du, Q., Gunzburger, M.D.: On the Lawrence–Doniach and anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau models for layered superconductors. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55(1), 156–174 (1995)
Chen, X.: Global asymptotic limit of solutions of the Cahn–Hilliard equation. J. Differ. Geom. 44(2), 262–311 (1996)
Chen, X., Hilhorst, D., Logak, E.: Mass conserving Allen–Cahn equation and volume preserving mean curvature flow. Interfaces Free Bound. 12(4), 527–549 (2010)
Chen, Y.G., Giga, Y., Goto, S.: Uniqueness and existence of viscosity solutions of generalized mean curvature flow equations. J. Differ. Geom. 33(3), 749–786 (1991)
Chen, Y.M., Struwe, M.: Existence and partial regularity results for the heat flow for harmonic maps. Math. Z. 201(1), 83–103 (1989)
De Mottoni, P., Schatzman, M.: Geometrical evolution of developed interfaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347(5), 1533–1589 (1995)
DiPerna, R.J., Lions, P.-L.: On the Cauchy problem for Boltzmann equations: global existence and weak stability. Ann. Math. (2) 130(2), 321–366 (1989)
Du, H., Huang, T., Wang, C.: Weak compactness of simplified nematic liquid flows in 2d (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04210
Evans, L.C., Gariepy, R.F.: Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions. Textbooks in Mathematics, revised CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Evans, L.C., Soner, H.M., Souganidis, P.E.: Phase transitions and generalized motion by mean curvature. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 45(9), 1097–1123 (1992)
Evans, L.C., Spruck, J.: Motion of level sets by mean curvature I. J. Differ. Geom. 33(3), 635–681 (1991)
Fei, M., Lin, F., Wang, W., Zhang, Z.: Matrix-valued Allen–Cahn equation and the Keller–Rubinstein–Sternberg problem. Invent. Math. 233(1), 1–80 (2023)
Fei, M., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: On the Isotropic–Nematic phase transition for the liquid crystal. Peking Math. J. 1(2), 141–219 (2018)
Fischer, J., Hensel, S.: Weak-strong uniqueness for the Navier–Stokes equation for two fluids with surface tension. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 236(2), 967–1087 (2020)
Fischer, J., Laux, T., Simon, T.M.: Convergence rates of the Allen–Cahn equation to mean curvature flow: a short proof based on relative entropies. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52(6), 6222–6233 (2020)
Fonseca, I., Müller, S.: Relaxation of quasiconvex functionals in \({\rm BV}(\Omega,{ R}^p)\) for integrands \(f(x, u,\nabla u)\). Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 123(1), 1–49 (1993)
Giaquinta, M., Martinazzi, L.: An introduction to the regularity theory for elliptic systems, harmonic maps and minimal graphs, volume 11 of Appunti. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (Nuova Serie) [Lecture Notes. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa (New Series)], 2nd edn. Edizioni della Normale, Pisa (2012)
Golovaty, D., Novack, M., Sternberg, P., Venkatraman, R.: A model problem for Nematic–Isotropic transitions with highly disparate elastic constants. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 236(3), 1739–1805 (2020)
Golovaty, D., Sternberg, P., Venkatraman, R.: A Ginzburg–Landau-type problem for highly anisotropic nematic liquid crystals. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51(1), 276–320 (2019)
Han, J., Luo, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: From microscopic theory to macroscopic theory: a systematic study on modeling for liquid crystals. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 215(3), 741–809 (2015)
Hardt, R., Kinderlehrer, D., Lin, F.-H.: Existence and partial regularity of static liquid crystal configurations. Commun. Math. Phys. 105(4), 547–570 (1986)
Hong, J., Kim, Y., Pac, P.Y.: Multivortex solutions of the abelian Chern–Simons–Higgs theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(19), 2230–2233 (1990)
Huisken, G.: Asymptotic behavior for singularities of the mean curvature flow. J. Differ. Geom. 31(1), 285–299 (1990)
Hutchinson, J.E., Tonegawa, Y.: Convergence of phase interfaces in the van der Waals–Cahn–Hilliard theory. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 10(1), 49–84 (2000)
Ilmanen, T.: Convergence of the Allen–Cahn equation to Brakke’s motion by mean curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 38(2), 417–461 (1993)
Iyer, G., Xu, X., Zarnescu, A.D.: Dynamic cubic instability in a 2D \(Q\)-tensor model for liquid crystals. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25(8), 1477–1517 (2015)
Jackiw, R., Weinberg, E.J.: Self-dual Chern–Simons vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(19), 2234–2237 (1990)
Jerrard, R.L., Smets, D.: On the motion of a curve by its binormal curvature. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 17(6), 1487–1515 (2015)
Kortum, J.: Concentration-cancellation in the Ericksen–Leslie model. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 59(6), 16 (2020)
Krylov, N.V.: Lectures on Elliptic and Parabolic Equations in Sobolev Spaces. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 96. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)
Laux, T., Liu, Y.: Nematic–isotropic phase transition in liquid crystals: a variational derivation of effective geometric motions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241(3), 1785–1814 (2021)
Leoni, G.: A First Course in Sobolev Spaces. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 18, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2017)
Lin, F., Wang, C.: The Analysis of Harmonic Maps and Their Heat Flows. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack (2008)
Lin, F., Wang, C.: Isotropic–Nematic phase transition and liquid crystal droplets. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 76(9), 1728–1792 (2023)
Lin, F.-H., Poon, C.: On Ericksen’s model for liquid crystals. J. Geom. Anal. 4(3), 379–392 (1994)
Liu, Y., Lu, X.Y., Xu, X.: Regularity of a gradient flow generated by the anisotropic Landau–de Gennes energy with a singular potential. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53(3), 3338–3365 (2021)
Modica, L.: A gradient bound and a Liouville theorem for nonlinear Poisson equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 38(5), 679–684 (1985)
Pisante, A., Punzo, F.: Allen–Cahn approximation of mean curvature flow in Riemannian manifolds I, uniform estimates. Ann. Sci. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 15, 309–341 (2016)
Röger, M., Schätzle, R.: On a modified conjecture of De Giorgi. Math. Z. 254(4), 675–714 (2006)
Saint-Raymond, L.: Hydrodynamic Limits of the Boltzmann Equation. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1971. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Sato, N.: A simple proof of convergence of the Allen–Cahn equation to Brakke’s motion by mean curvature. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57(4), 1743–1751 (2008)
Schlag, W.: Schauder and \(L^p\) estimates for parabolic systems via Campanato spaces. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 21(7–8), 1141–1175 (1996)
Simon, J.: Compact sets in the space \(L^p(0, T;B)\). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 4(146), 65–96 (1987)
Soner, H.M.: Ginzburg–Landau equation and motion by mean curvature I. Convergence. J. Geom. Anal. 7(3), 437–475 (1997)
Tonegawa, Y.: Integrality of varifolds in the singular limit of reaction–diffusion equations. Hiroshima Math. J. 33(3), 323–341 (2003)
Acknowledgements
Y. Liu is partially supported by NSF of China under Grant 11971314. We thank an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Yoshihiro Tonegawa.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Proof of Proposition 1.1
Proof of Proposition 1.1
We first recall that \(\sigma =1\) (cf. (2.5)), \(I_0\subset \Omega \) is the initial interface and \(\eta _0\) is the cut-off function in (2.12). Then we define
where \(\theta (z)\) is the solution of the ODE
We note that \(d_{I_0}\) is Lipschitz continuous in \(\Omega \), and thus by Rademacher’s theorem we have \(|\nabla d_{I_0}|\leqslant 1\) a.e. in \(\Omega \). Recalling (1.19), we define
One can verify that \({\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon ^{in}\in W^{1,2}_0(\Omega )\cap L^\infty (\Omega )\), \(\Vert {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon ^{in}\Vert _{L^\infty (\Omega )}\leqslant 1\), and
So the condition (1.14a) is verified. To verify the others, we first compute the modulated energy in (1.7) for the initial datum \({\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon ^{in} \). We write (A.1) as
where \( {\hat{s}}_\varepsilon (x):=\left( 1-\eta _0\left( x \right) \right) \left( {\textbf{1}}_{\Omega ^+_0} -\theta \left( \frac{d_{I_0}(x)}{\varepsilon }\right) \right) \). Invoking (2.12) and the exponential convergence of \(\theta (z)\) as \(z\rightarrow \pm \infty \) (cf. (A.2)), we deduce that
for some constant \(C>0\) that only depends on \(I_0\). By a Taylor’s expansion, we find
Combining (A.3), (A.5) with (A.6), we obtain
Note that we have also employed the identities \(\partial _{x_i} {\textbf{u}}^{in}\cdot {\textbf{u}}^{in}=0\) a.e. in \(\Omega \). Recalling (1.8), we have
So we can compute
It follows from (2.10) that \(1-\varvec{\xi }\cdot {\textbf{n}}_{I_0}=O(d_I^2)\). So we have
Note that the last term can be written as
Substituting the above two equations into (A.8), we find
Note that the integrand of the first integral on the right-hand side of (A.9) vanishes due to the identity \(\theta '^2(z)=2f(\theta (z))\), which follows from (A.2). Now we turn to the first term in (1.7). Using (A.6) we can estimate
By the exponential decay of \(\theta '(z)\) as \(z\rightarrow \pm \infty \), we deduce that
Using this, (1.19) and Hardy’s inequality (cf. [7]), we find
Combining this with (A.10) and (A.9) we derive \(E_\varepsilon [{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon ^{in} | I_0]\leqslant C\varepsilon \). Recalling (1.21), we have also obtained (1.14b). To verify (1.14c), we shall compute (1.12) at \(t=0\). By (A.7), we see that
We shall only give the estimate in \(B_{\delta _0}(I_0)\cap \Omega _0^+\) because the one in \(B_{\delta _0}(I_0)\cap \Omega _0^-\) follows in the same way, and the one in \(\Omega \backslash B_{\delta _0}(I_0)\) is due to (A.6) and the exponential convergence of \(\theta (z)\) at \(\pm \infty \).
where the last step is due to the exponential decay of \(Q(z):=z\int _{\theta (z)}^1\sqrt{2f(s)}\, ds\) as \(z\uparrow \infty \). \(\square \)
Appendix B: Proof of Proposition 2.1
Lemma B.1
The following identity holds:
Proof
We introduce the stress tensor \( (T_\varepsilon )_{ij}:= \left( \frac{\varepsilon }{2} |\nabla {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |^2 +\frac{1}{\varepsilon } F ({\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon ) \right) \delta _{ij} - \varepsilon \partial _i {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon \cdot \partial _j {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon .\) By (2.20b), we have the identity \(\nabla \cdot T_\varepsilon ={\textbf{H}}_\varepsilon |\nabla {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |.\) Testing this identity with \({\textbf{H}}\), integrating by parts and using (2.14c), we obtain
So adding zero leads to
which yields (B.1). \(\square \)
Lemma B.2
Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.1, the following identity holds:
where
Proof
We shall employ the Einstein summation convention by summing over repeated indices. Using the energy dissipation law in (2.6) and adding zero, we find
By the symmetry of \(\nabla ^2\psi _\varepsilon \) and the boundary conditions in (2.14c), we have
Hence, the first integral on the right-hand side of (B.5) can be rewritten as
Therefore,
Now using (B.1) to replace the third and the fourth integrals on the right-hand side of the above equation, we find
We shall show that \(J_\varepsilon ^1\) arises from the second and the third to last integrals by proving the following identity:
where \((n_\varepsilon ^\ell )_{1\leqslant \ell \leqslant 3}={\textbf{n}}_\varepsilon \). Such an identity holds obviously on the set \(\{ x\mid {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon =0\}\) by (2.22). It also holds on \(\{ x \mid g(|{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |)>0\}\) due to the following identity which follows from (2.22) and (2.23a):
On the open set \(\{ x\mid |{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |>0\}\) which includes \(\{ x\mid |{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |=1\}\), we deduce from (2.22) and (2.19a) that \(\Pi _{{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon } \partial _j {\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon =(\partial _j |{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |) ~{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon \). By [18, Theorem 4.4] we have \(\partial _j |{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |=0\) a.e. on \(\{ x\mid |{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon |=1\}\). We thus complete the proof of (B.7).
Now by (B.7) and adding zero, we find
Using the identities \(\nabla \psi _\varepsilon ={\textbf{n}}_\varepsilon |\nabla \psi _\varepsilon |\) and \( \nabla {\textbf{H}}:(\varvec{\xi }\otimes \varvec{\xi })=0\) (due to (2.14b)), we merge the second and the third integrals on the right-hand side of (B.6):
Now we complete squares for the first four terms on the right-hand side of (B.8). Reordering terms, we have
Substituting this identity into (B.8), we arrive at (B.2). \(\square \)
Proof of Proposition 2.1
The proof here is the same as the case \(\mu =0\), done in [40, Lemma 4.4]. This is because the form of the energy dissipation law (2.6) remains unchanged in the presence of the divergence term in (1.2a).
We first estimate the right-hand side of (B.2) by \(E_\varepsilon [{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon | I]\) up to a constant that only depends on \(I_t\). Concerning (B.2a), it follows from the triangle inequality that
The first integral on the right-hand side of the above inequality is controlled using (2.26c). Due to the elementary inequality \(|\varvec{\xi }- {\textbf{n}}_\varepsilon |^2 \leqslant 2 (1-{\textbf{n}}_\varepsilon \cdot \varvec{\xi })\), the second integral is controlled by (2.26d). The third integral can be treated using the relation \({\textbf{H}}=({\textbf{H}}\cdot \varvec{\xi }) \varvec{\xi }+O(d_I(x,t))\) and (2.15a). So it can be controlled by (2.26e).
The integrals in (B.2b) can be controlled using (2.26c) and (2.26d). The one in (B.2c) is controlled by (2.26a). The first term in (B.2d) can be controlled using (2.26d). It remains to estimate (B.3) and (B.4). The integrals of the last two terms defining \(J_\varepsilon ^1\) can be controlled by (2.26b). Therefore,
The first and the third integrals in the last display can be estimated using (2.26b) and (2.26e) respectively. Then we employ (2.23a) to find
Finally applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and then (2.26c) and (2.26d), we obtain \(\int J_\varepsilon ^1 \,dx\leqslant C E_\varepsilon [{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon | I].\) As for \(J_\varepsilon ^2\) (B.4), we employ (2.15c) and (2.26e) to obtain \(\int J_\varepsilon ^2\,dx \leqslant C E_\varepsilon [{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon | I].\) All in all, we have proved that the right-hand side of (B.2) is bounded by \(E_\varepsilon [{\textbf{u}}_\varepsilon | I]\) up to a multiplicative constant which only depends on \(I_t\). \(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y. Phase transition of an anisotropic Ginzburg–Landau equation. Calc. Var. 63, 171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-024-02779-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-024-02779-5

