Advertisement

Foliations by stable spheres with constant mean curvature for isolated systems without asymptotic symmetry

  • Christopher NerzEmail author
Article

Abstract

In 1996, Huisken–Yau showed that every three-dimensional Riemannian manifold can be uniquely foliated near infinity by stable closed CMC-surfaces if it is asymptotically equal to the (spatial) Schwarzschild solution and has positive mass. Their assumptions were later weakened by Metzger, Huang, Eichmair–Metzger and others. We further generalize these existence results in dimension three by proving that it is sufficient to assume asymptotic flatness and non-vanishing mass to conclude the existence and uniqueness of the CMC-foliation and explain why this seems to be the conceptually optimal result. Furthermore, we generalize the characterization of the corresponding coordinate CMC-center of mass by the ADM-center of mass proven previously by Corvino–Wu, Huang, Eichmair–Metzger and others (under other assumptions).

Mathematics Subject Classification

89-02 53-02 58-02 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to express gratitude to Gerhard Huisken for suggesting this topic, many inspiring discussions and ongoing supervision. Further thanks is owed to Lan-Hsuan Huang for suggesting the use of the Bochner–Lichnerowicz formula in this setting—a central step in the argument (Lemma 4.5). Finally, this paper would not have attained its current form and clarity without the useful suggestions by Carla Cederbaum and the referee.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: Coordinate invariance and energy expressions in general relativity. Phys. Rev. 122(3), 997 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, R.A., Fournier, J.J.F.: Sobolev Spaces, vol. 140. Academic press, New York (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashtekar, A., Hansen, R.O.: A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. i. universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity. J. Math. Phys. 19(7), 1542–1566 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartnik, R.: The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 39(5), 661–693 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbosa, J.L., do Carmo, M.: Stability of hypersurfaces with constant mean curvature. In: Manfredo P. do Carmo-Selected Papers, pp 221–235. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brendle, S., Eichmair, M.: Large outlying stable constant mean curvature spheres in initial data sets. Invent. Math. 197, 663–682 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beig, R., Murchadha, N.Ó.: The Poincaré group as the symmetry group of canonical general relativity. Ann. Phys. 174(2), 463–498 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chrusciel, P.T., Delay, E.: On mapping properties of the general relativistic constraints operator in weighted function spaces, with applications. In: Mémoires de la Société Mathématique de France (Nouvelle Série) (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cederbaum, C.: The Newtonian limit of geometrostatics. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin (2012). arXiv:1201.5433v1
  10. 10.
    Chrusciel, P.T.: A remark on the positive-energy theorem. Class. Quantum Gravity 3(6), L115 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christodoulou, D., Klainerman, S.: The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space, vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cederbaum, C., Nerz, C.: Explicit riemannian manifolds with unexpectedly behaving center of mass. In: Annales Henri Poincaré, pp. 1–23 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s00023-014-0346-0
  13. 13.
    Corvino, J., Wu, H.: On the center of mass of isolated systems. Class. Quantum Gravity 25(8), 085008 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christodoulou, D., Yau, S.T.: Some remarks on the quasi-local mass. In: Mathematics and General Relativity (Santa Cruz. CA, 1986), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 71, pp. 9–14. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Lellis, C., Müller, S.: Optimal rigidity estimates for nearly umbilical surfaces. J. Differ. Geom. 69(1), 075–110 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Lellis, C., Müller, S.: A \(c^0\) estimate for nearly umbilical surfaces. Calc. Var. Partial. Differ. Equations 26(3), 283–296 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denisov, V.I., Solov’ev, V.O.: The energy determined in general relativity on the basis of the traditional hamiltonian approach does not have physical meaning. Theor. Math. Phys. 56(2), 832–841 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eichmair, M., Metzger, J.: Unique isoperimetric foliations of asymptotically flat manifolds in all dimensions. Invent. Math. 194(3), 591–630 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giaquinta, M., Martinazzi, L.: An introduction to the regularity theory for elliptic systems, harmonic maps and minimal graphs. In: Edizioni della normale. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hawking, S.W.: Gravitational radiation in an expanding universe. J. Math. Phys. 9(4), 598–604 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, L.-H.: On the center of mass of isolated systems with general asymptotics. Class. Quantum Gravity 26(1), 015012 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang, L.-H.: Foliations by stable spheres with constant mean curvature for isolated systems with general asymptotics. Commun. Math. Phys. 300(2), 331–373 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huisken, G., Yau, S.-T.: Definition of center of mass for isolated physical systems and unique foliations by stable spheres with constant mean curvature. Invent. Math. 124, 281–311 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lamm, T., Metzger, J., Schulze, F.: Foliations of asymptotically flat manifolds by surfaces of willmore type. Math. Ann. 350(1), 1–78 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Metzger, J.: Foliations of asymptotically flat 3-manifolds by 2-surfaces of prescribed mean curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 77(2), 201–236 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miao, P., Tam, L.-F.: Evaluation of the adm mass and center of mass via ricci tensor (2014). arXiv:1408.3893v2
  27. 27.
    Nerz, C.: Time evolution of ADM and CMC center of mass in general relativity (2013). arXiv:1312.6274v1
  28. 28.
    Nerz, C.: Geometric characterizations of asymptotic flatness and linear momentum in general relativity (2014). arXiv:1409.6039v2
  29. 29.
    Nerz, C.: Foliations by spheres with constant expansion for isolated systems without asymptotic symmetry (2015). arXiv:1501.02197
  30. 30.
    Regge, T., Teitelboim, C.: Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. Ann. Phys. 88(1), 286–318 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schoen, R.M.: The existence of weak solutions with prescribed singular behavior for a conformally invariant scalar equation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41(3), 317–392 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simons, J.: Minimal varieties in riemannian manifolds. Ann. Math. 88(1), 62–105 (1968)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schoen, R., Simon, L., Yau, S.-T.: Curvature estimates for minimal hypersurfaces. Acta Math. 134(1), 275–288 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stampacchia, G.: On some regular multiple integral problems in the calculus of variations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 16, 383–421 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Struwe, M.: Curvature flows on surfaces. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa-Classe di Scienze-Serie V 1(2), 247–274 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematisches InstitutUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations