Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dose multimodal machine translation can improve translation performance?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multimodal machine translation (MMT) is a method that uses visual information to guide text translation. However, recent studies have engendered controversy regarding the extent to which MMT can contribute to the improvement of text-enhanced translation. To explore whether the MMT model can improve translation performance, we use the current Neural Machine Translation (NMT) system for evaluation at Multi30K dataset. Specifically, we judge the performance of the MMT model by comparing the difference between the NMT model and the MMT model. At the same time, we conduct text and multimodal degradation experiments to verify whether vision can play a role. We explored the performance of the NMT model and the MMT model for sentences of different lengths to clarify the pros and cons of the MMT model. We found that the performance of the current NMT model surpasses that of the MMT model, suggesting that the impact of visual features might be less significant. Visual features seem to exert influence primarily when a substantial number of words in the source text are masked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data included are freely available through the following repository: https://github.com/multi30k/dataset.

References

  1. Barrault L, Bougares F, Specia L, Lala C, Elliott D, Frank S (2018) Findings of the third shared task on multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the third conference on machine translation: shared task papers, pp 304–323

  2. Caglayan O, Barrault L, Bougares F (2016) Multimodal attention for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03976

  3. Caglayan O, Aransa W, Bardet A, García-Martínez M, Bougares F, Barrault L, Masana M, Herranz L, van de Weijer J (2017) LIUM-CVC submissions for WMT17 multimodal translation task. In: Proceedings of the second conference on machine translation, association for computational linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 432–439 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-4746

  4. Caglayan O, Madhyastha P, Specia L, Barrault L (2019) Probing the need for visual context in multimodal machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.08678

  5. Caglayan O, Ive J, Haralampieva V, Madhyastha P, Barrault L, Specia L (2020) Simultaneous machine translation with visual context. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), association for computational linguistics, Online, pp 2350–236https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.184

  6. Calixto I, Rios M, Aziz W (2019) Latent variable model for multi-modal translation. In: Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, association for computational linguistics, Florence, Italy, pp 6392–640https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1642

  7. Carlsson F, Eisen P, Rekathati F, Sahlgren M (2022) Cross-lingual and multilingual clip. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth language resources and evaluation conference, pp 6848–6854

  8. Chen S, Zeng Y, Cao D, Lu S (2022) Video-guided machine translation via dual-level back-translation. Knowl Based Syst 245:108598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Dehghani M, Minderer M, Heigold G, Gelly S, et al. (2020) An image is worth \(16\times 16\) words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

  10. Elliott D (2018) Adversarial evaluation of multimodal machine translation. In: EMNLP, pp 2974–2978

  11. Elliott D, Frank S, Sima’an K, Specia L (2016) Multi30k: multilingual English–German image descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 5th workshop on vision and language, association for computational linguistics, pp 70–77. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-3210

  12. Elliott D, Frank S, Barrault L, Bougares F, Specia L (2017) Findings of the second shared task on multimodal machine translation and multilingual image description. In: Proceedings of the second conference on machine translation, volume 2: shared task papers, association for computational linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 215–233. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-4718

  13. Gain B, Bandyopadhyay D, Mukherjee S, Adak C, Ekbal A (2023) Impact of visual context on noisy multimodal NMT: an empirical study for English to Indian languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16075

  14. Grönroos SA, Huet B, Kurimo M, Laaksonen J, Merialdo B, Pham P, Sjöberg M, Sulubacak U, Tiedemann J, Troncy R et al (2018) The MeMAD submission to the wmt18 multimodal translation task. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.10802

  15. Gupta D, Kharbanda S, Zhou J, Li W, Pfister H, Wei D (2023) CLIPTrans: transferring visual knowledge with pre-trained models for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp 2875–2886

  16. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

  17. Helcl J, Libovickỳ J, Variš D (2018) CUNI system for the WMT18 multimodal translation task. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04697

  18. Huang PY, Liu F, Shiang SR, Oh J, Dyer C (2016) Attention-based multimodal neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the first conference on machine translation, shared task papers, vol 2, pp 639–645

  19. Imankulova A, Kaneko M, Hirasawa T, Komachi M (2020) Toward multimodal simultaneous neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on machine translation, association for computational linguistics, Online, pp 540–549 https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.wmt-1.70

  20. Li L, Tayir T, Han Y, Tao X, Velásquez JD (2023) Multimodality information fusion for automated machine translation. Inf Fusion 91:352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Libovický J, Helcl J (2017) Attention strategies for multi-source sequence-to-sequence learning. In: Barzilay R, Kan MY (eds) Proceedings of the 55th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (vol 2: short papers), association for computational linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, pp 196–20https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2031

  22. Lin H, Meng F, Su J, Yin Y, Yang Z, Ge Y, Zhou J, Luo J (2020) Dynamic context-guided capsule network for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp 1320–1329

  23. Liu P, Cao H, Zhao T (2021) Gumbel-attention for multi-modal machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.08862

  24. Long Q, Wang M, Li L (2021) Generative imagination elevates machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2021 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, association for computational linguistics, Online, pp 5738–574https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.457

  25. Madhyastha PS, Wang J, Specia L (2017) Sheffield multimt: using object posterior predictions for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the second conference on machine translation, pp 470–476

  26. Peng R, Zeng Y, Zhao J (2022) Distill the image to nowhere: inversion knowledge distillation for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2022 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, association for computational linguistics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp 2379–2390 https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.152

  27. Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, Ramesh A, Goh G, Agarwal S, Sastry G, Askell A, Mishkin P, Clark J et al (2021) Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning, PMLR, pp 8748–8763

  28. Raffel C, Shazeer N, Roberts A, Lee K, Narang S, Matena M, Zhou Y, Li W, Liu PJ (2020) Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J Mach Learn Res 21(1):5485–5551

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shaw P, Uszkoreit J, Vaswani A (2018) Self-attention with relative position representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155

  30. Song Y, Chen S, Jin Q, Luo W, Xie J, Huang F (2021) Enhancing neural machine translation with dual-side multimodal awareness. IEEE Trans Multimedia 24:3013–3024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Specia L, Frank S, Sima’An K, Elliott D (2016) A shared task on multimodal machine translation and crosslingual image description. In: Proceedings of the first conference on machine translation, shared task papers, vol 2, pp 543–553

  32. Tamura H, Hirasawa T, Kaneko M, Komachi M (2020) TMU Japanese-English multimodal machine translation system for wat 2020. In: Proceedings of the 7th workshop on Asian translation, pp 80–91

  33. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. In: Advances in neural information processing system, vol 30

  34. Wang X, Wu J, Chen J, Li L, Wang YF, Wang WY (2019) VaTeX: a large-scale, high-quality multilingual dataset for video-and-language research. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp 4581–4591

  35. Wu Z, Kong L, Bi W, Li X, Kao B (2021a) Good for misconceived reasons: an empirical revisiting on the need for visual context in multimodal machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14462

  36. Wu Z, Kong L, Bi W, Li X, Kao B (2021b) Good for misconceived reasons: an empirical revisiting on the need for visual context in multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 59th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 11th international joint conference on natural language processing (Volume 1: long papers), association for computational linguistics, Online, pp 6153–616 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.480

  37. Yang P, Chen B, Zhang P, Sun X (2020) Visual agreement regularized training for multi-modal machine translation. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 34:9418–9425

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang Z, Hirasawa T, Komachi M, Okazaki N (2022) Why videos do not guide translations in video-guided machine translation? An empirical evaluation of video-guided machine translation dataset. J Inform Process 30:388–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yao S, Wan X (2020) Multimodal transformer for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 58th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 4346–4350

  40. Yin Y, Meng F, Su J, Zhou C, Yang Z, Zhou J, Luo J (2020) A novel graph-based multi-modal fusion encoder for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.08742

  41. Young P, Lai A, Hodosh M, Hockenmaier J (2014) From image descriptions to visual denotations: new similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 2:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhao Y, Komachi M, Kajiwara T, Chu C (2020) Double attention-based multimodal neural machine translation with semantic image regions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the European association for machine translation, pp 105–114

  43. Zhao Y, Komachi M, Kajiwara T, Chu C (2022) Region-attentive multimodal neural machine translation. Neurocomputing 476:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou M, Cheng R, Lee YJ, Yu Z (2018) A visual attention grounding neural model for multimodal machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, association for computational linguistics, Brussels, Belgium, pp 3643–365https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1400

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Ibaraki University, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan

    ShaoDong Cui, Kaibo Duan, Wen Ma & Hiroyuki Shinnou

Authors
  1. ShaoDong Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaibo Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroyuki Shinnou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ShaoDong Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no Conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, S., Duan, K., Ma, W. et al. Dose multimodal machine translation can improve translation performance?. Neural Comput & Applic (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09705-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09705-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation