Skip to main content
Log in

Traffic emission estimation under incomplete information with spatiotemporal convolutional GAN

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precise emission estimation of vehicle exhausts is crucial to urban traffic pollution prevention and control. Existing methods utilize the widely distributed and large number of GPS data to estimate the emission distribution of vehicles in the road network. However, the emission features are insufficient to decrease the estimation accuracy when the data distribution is uneven and sparse in the spatial and temporal domains. To address this problem, we propose a two-step emission estimation model under incomplete information, which exploits the spatiotemporal propagation features of emission information. Specifically, an adaptive smoothing strategy reconstructs a second-by-second emission rate field by modeling the correlation of neighboring traffic states, to address the inconsistency of time intervals between emission models and sampling intervals. Then a spatiotemporal convolutional GAN (ST-CGAN) is proposed, which introduces the spatiotemporal convolution operator to generate the traffic emission by temporal features and structural similarity. We evaluated the proposed method using the GPS trajectory data on Didi Chuxing GAIA Open Dataset. The framework aligns GPS data and emission models and reconstructs effectively the high-emission features in traffic networks. The proposed ST-CGAN generates a more reasonable spatial and temporal distribution of vehicle emissions than state-of-the-art methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Xu Z, Cao Y, Kang Y, Zhao Z (2020) Vehicle emission control on road with temporal traffic information using deep reinforcement learning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53:14960–14965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duan Y, Lv Y, Liu Y-L, Wang F-Y (2016) An efficient realization of deep learning for traffic data imputation. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 72:168–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu JJQ, Gu J (2019) Real-time traffic speed estimation with graph convolutional generative autoencoder. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 20:3940–3951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao Z-Y, Cao Y, Kang Y, Xu Z-Y (2021) Prediction of spatiotemporal evolution of urban traffic emissions based on taxi trajectories. Int J Autom Comput 18:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agency UEP (2003) User’s guide to mobile 6.1 and mobile 6.2 mobile source emission factor model

  6. Ntziachristos L, Gkatzoflias D, Kouridis C, Samaras Z (2009) COPERT: a European road transport emission inventory model. In: Information technologies in environmental engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 491–504

  7. USEPA U, Environmental Protection Agency (2014) User Guide for MOVES2014. EPA report, Technical Report, EPA-420-B-14-055. Office of Transportation and Air Quality 2014

  8. Davis N, Lents J, Osses M, Nikkila N, Barth M (1939) Development and application of an international vehicle emissions model. Transp Res Rec 2005:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scora G, Barth M (2006) Comprehensive modal emissions model (CMEM), version 3.01, User guide. Centre for environmental research and technology. University of California, Riverside 1070:79

  10. Cappiello A, Chabini I, Nam EK, Lue A, Abou Zeid M (2002) A statistical model of vehicle emissions and fuel consumption. In: Proceedings. The IEEE 5th international conference on intelligent transportation systems. IEEE, pp 801–809

  11. Liu J, Han K, Chen XM, Ong GP (2019) Spatial-temporal inference of urban traffic emissions based on taxi trajectories and multi-source urban data. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 106:145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shang J, Zheng Y, Tong W, Chang E, Yu Y (2014) Inferring gas consumption and pollution emission of vehicles throughout a city. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 1027–1036

  13. Wang S, Li Z, Tan J, Guo W, Li L (2017) A method for estimating carbon dioxide emissions based on low frequency GPS trajectories. In: 2017 Chinese automation congress (CAC). IEEE, pp 1960–1964

  14. Chen S, Bekhor S, Broday DM et al (2016) Aggregated GPS tracking of vehicles and its use as a proxy of traffic-related air pollution emissions. Atmos Environ 142:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li T, Wu J, Dang A, Liao L, Xu M (2019) Emission pattern mining based on taxi trajectory data in Beijing. J Clean Prod 206:688–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nocera S, Ruiz-Alarcón-Quintero C, Cavallaro F (2018) Assessing carbon emissions from road transport through traffic flow estimators. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 95:125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu Z, Hu W, Tan T (2005) Similarity based vehicle trajectory clustering and anomaly detection. In: IEEE international conference on image processing 2005, vol 2. IEEE, pp II–602

  18. Song H, Wang X, Hua C, Wang W, Guan Q, Zhang Z (2018) Vehicle trajectory clustering based on 3D information via a coarse-to-fine strategy. Soft Comput 22:1433–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu H, Lee G, Kim JH, Shin H (2020) Estimating micro-level on-road vehicle emissions using the k-means clustering method with GPS big data. Electronics 9:2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lv Y, Duan Y, Kang W, Li Z, Wang F-Y (2014) Traffic flow prediction with big data: a deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16:865–873

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X, Xu Y, Shao Y (2022) Forecasting traffic flow with spatial–temporal convolutional graph attention networks. Neural Comput Appl 1–23

  22. Valput D, Navares R, Aznarte JL (2020) Forecasting hourly NO2 concentrations by ensembling neural networks and mesoscale models. Neural Comput Appl 32:9331–9342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu Y, Li Z, Zhu H, Li M, Zhang Q (2012) A compressive sensing approach to urban traffic estimation with probe vehicles. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12:2289–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang H, Lee Y, Yoon B, Baek S (2012) Dynamic near-term traffic flow prediction: system-oriented approach based on past experiences. IET Intel Transport Syst 6:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karri V, Ho TN (2009) Predictive models for emission of hydrogen powered car using various artificial intelligent tools. Neural Comput Appl 18:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Huang Q, Kerber M, Zhang L, Guibas L (2013) Large-scale joint map matching of GPS traces. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, pp 214–223

  27. Treiber M, Helbing D (2002) Reconstructing the spatio-temporal traffic dynamics from stationary detector data. Cooper@tive Tr@nsport@tion Dyn@mics 1:3–1

  28. Edie LC (1961) Car-following and steady-state theory for noncongested traffic. Oper Res 9:66–76

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 27:2672–2680

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kipf TN, Welling M (2016) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907

  31. Gehring J, Auli M, Grangier D, Yarats D, Dauphin YN (2017) Convolutional sequence to sequence learning. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp 1243–1252

  32. Clevert D-A, Unterthiner T, Hochreiter S (2015) Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs). arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289

  33. Klambauer G, Unterthiner T, Mayr A, Hochreiter S (2017) lf-normalizing neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems, pp 972–981

  34. Mescheder L, Geiger A, Nowozin A (2018) Which training methods for GANs do actually converge? In: International conference on machine learning, pp 3481–3490

  35. Chuxing D (2019) Gaia open dataset. Internet Link: https://outreach.didichuxing.com/research/opendata/en/. Accessed 18 Aug 2019

  36. Haklay M, Weber P (2008) Openstreetmap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput 7:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang S, Zhu Q (2020) Independent gaussian distributions minimize the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence from independent gaussian distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.02560

  38. Müller M (2007) Dynamic time warping. Information retrieval for music and motion, pp 69–84

  39. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, Chen Z, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Irving G, Isard M, et al (2016) Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning. In: 12th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI 16), pp 265–283

  40. Kobs K, Schäfer C, Steininger M, Krause A, Baumhauer R, Paeth H, Hotho A (2021) Semi-supervised learning for grain size distribution interpolation. In: International conference on pattern recognition. Springer, Berlin, pp 34–44

  41. Daoud H, Bayoumi M (2019) Semi-supervised learning for epileptic focus localization using deep convolutional autoencoder. In: 2019 IEEE biomedical circuits and systems conference (BioCAS). IEEE, pp 1–4

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62033012, 61725304, 62103124), Major Special Science and Technology Project of Anhui, China (201903a07020012, 202003a07020009), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M703119).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Z., Cao, Y., Xu, Z. et al. Traffic emission estimation under incomplete information with spatiotemporal convolutional GAN. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 15821–15835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08420-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08420-4

Keywords

Navigation