Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative analysis of rail transit braking digital command control strategies based on neural network

  • S.I.: AI based Techniques and Applications for Intelligent IoT Systems
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An urban subway network system is a complex public transportation system. To compare rail transit braking digital command control strategies based on neural network, this article analyzes and studies the characteristics of subway vehicle driver controllers and their design methods from three aspects: mechanical, electrical and software-assisted design. The learning rule of the BP neural network is called the mentor system learning rule, which is a kind of error-correcting algorithm. In the learning and training process, the expected output value needs to be given. The weights and thresholds of the BP neural network are optimized by selecting the parameters of the SA algorithm. The search method of SA is heuristic, and it has the following advantages: The selection of the initial solution does not affect the optimal solution. The simplified model extracts the core data processing individual analysis. In this paper, the physical data are extracted from the physical entity operation process for analysis, and the twin model is established to extract the twin data for analysis. This paper uses the characteristics of physical data to test the modeling effect and utilizes the twin data to carry out algorithm experiments on physical data. The ultimate goal is to use twin data to predict the state information of physical entities. The network error in the scheme designed by the article is 6%. The smooth implementation of this research constitutes an important reference for the design of subway train network control systems in other cities in China. Therefore, this research has great application value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Schleich B, Anwer N, Mathieu L et al (2017) Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66(1):141–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhuang C, Liu J, Xiong H et al (2017) Connotation architecture and trends of product digital twin. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 23(4):753–768

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li C, Mahadevan S, You L et al (2017) Dynamic Bayesian network for aircraft wing health monitoring digital twin. AIAA J 55(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang H, Liu Q, Chen X et al (2017) A digital twin-based approach for designing and multi-objective optimization of hollow glass production line. IEEE Access 2017(5):26901–26911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seay S (2019) Seeing double: Digital twin for a secure, resilient grid. Oak Ridge National Lab Rev 52(2):34–35

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin B, Du Z (2017) Can urban rail transit curb automobile energy consumption?. Energy Policy 105(JUN.):120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ko CH, Chen JK (2017) Grasping force based manipulation for multifingered hand-arm robot using neural networks. Numer Algebra Control Optim 4(1):59–74

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Aditi, Misra, Aaron (2018) Crowdsourcing and its application to transportation data collection and management. Transportation Res Record 2414(1):1–8.

  9. Justin G (2018) Consistency of stochastic capacity estimations Transp Res Rec 2173(1):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu K , Yamamoto T , Morikawa T (2017) Impact of road gradient on energy consumption of electric vehicles. Transp Res D Transp Environ 54(jul.):74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao F, Sui F, Liu A et al (2019) Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int J Prod Res 57(11–12):3935–3953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Acierno L, Botte M, Placido A et al (2017) Methodology for determining dwell times consistent with passenger flows in the case of metro services. Urban Rail Transit 3(2):73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kai L, Han B, Zhou X (2018) Smart urban transit systems: from integrated framework to interdisciplinary perspective. Urban Rail Transit 4(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen J P, Brown M (2017) Does a new rail rapid transit line announcement affect various commercial property prices differently?. Reg Sci Urban Econ 66(sep.):74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng W, Wang Y (2017) Cognitive communication in rail transit: awareness, adaption, and reasoning. It Professional 19(4):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ning B, Liu C , University BJ, et al (2017) Technology and application of train operation control system for china rail transit system. J China Railway Soc 39(2):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang Z, Phang SY (2017) Urban rail transit PPPs: lessons from East Asian cities. Transp Res A Policy Pract 105(nov.):106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Love P, Ahiaga-Dagbui D, Welde M, et al (2017) Light rail transit cost performance: opportunities for future-proofing. Transp Res A Policy Pract 100(Jun.):27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Chen Y, Wang C (2020) Research on evolutionary model of urban rail transit vulnerability based on computer simulation. Neural Comput Appl 32:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan F, Gao C, Tang T et al (2017) A safety management and signaling system integration method for communication-based train control system. Urban Rail Transit 3(2):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharav N, Bekhor S, Shiftan Y (2018) Network analysis of the tel aviv mass transit plan. Urban Rail Transit 4(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, Chongqing, China

    Zheyuan Fan, Darong Huang & Jin Tan

  2. School of River and Ocean Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, 400074, Chongqing, China

    Keqin Xu

Authors
  1. Zheyuan Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Darong Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keqin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jin Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheyuan Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that this article has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, Z., Huang, D., Xu, K. et al. Comparative analysis of rail transit braking digital command control strategies based on neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 8833–8845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07552-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07552-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation