Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective optimization of electric vehicle routing problem with battery swap and mixed time windows

  • Review
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing interest in green logistics, the electric vehicles have been widely used as an important distribution means. In this paper, the electric vehicle routing problem with battery swap consideration and mixed time windows constraints (EVRP-BS-MTW) is proposed. The problem aims to minimize the total distribution costs and maximize the average utilization of batteries simultaneously, meeting both the environmental and economic interests. To solve this problem, a multi-objective whale optimization algorithm enhanced by particle filter and Levy flights (MWOA-PFLF) is developed. The introduction of particle filter makes it possible to predict the near optimal solutions at each iteration, meanwhile, the combination of Levy flights contributes to escape from local optimum and accelerate convergence. Experimental results have verified the efficiency of the neighborhood search strategies. The results also indicate that the proposed MWOA-PFLF outperforms the comparison algorithms both in solution quality and convergence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dekker R, Bloemhof J, Mallidis I (2012) Operations research for green logistics—an overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. Eur J Oper Res 219:671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis BA, Figliozzi MA (2013) A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks. Transp Res Part E 49:8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keskin M, Çatay B, Laporte G (2021) A simulation-based heuristic for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and stochastic waiting times at recharging stations. Comput Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105060

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider F, Thonemann UW, Klabjan D (2017) Optimization of battery charging and purchasing at electric vehicle battery swap stations. Transp Sci 52:1211–1234. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2011.6043182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mak HY, Ying R, Shen ZJM (2013) Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping. Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Avci B, Girotra K, Netessine S (2015) Electric vehicles with a battery switching station: adoption and environmental impact. Soc Sci Electron Publ. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei F, Figliozzi M (2013) An economic and technological analysis of the key factors affecting the competitiveness of electric commercial vehicles: a case study from the USA market. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 26:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tredeau FP, Salameh ZM (2009) Evaluation of Lithium iron phosphate batteries for electric vehicles application. In: IEEE vehicle power & propulsion conference, 2009

  9. Schneider M, Stenger A, Goeke D (2014) The electric vehicle-routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Transp Sci 48:500–520. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2013.0490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Briand C, He Y, Ngueveu SU (2018) Energy-efficient planning for supplying assembly lines with vehicles. Euro J Transp Log 7:387–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13676-018-0129-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy SS, Bijwe PR (2017) Differential evolution-based efficient multi-objective optimal power flow. Neural Comput Appl 31:509–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3009-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong G, Deng Q, Chiong R et al (2019) An effective memetic algorithm for multi-objective job-shop scheduling. Knowl-Based Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou B, Li X, Zhang Y (2020) Improved multi-objective cuckoo search algorithm with novel search strategies for point-to-point part feeding scheduling problems of automotive assembly lines. Assem Autom 41:24–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-06-2020-0081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nazari-Heris M, Mehdinejad M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B et al (2017) Combined heat and power economic dispatch problem solution by implementation of whale optimization method. Neural Comput Appl 31:421–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3074-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tahani M, Yousefi H, Noorollahi Y et al (2018) Application of nature inspired optimization algorithms in optimum positioning of pump-as-turbines in water distribution networks. Neural Comput Appl 31:7489–7499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3566-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalilpourazari S, Pasandideh SHR, Ghodratnama A (2018) Robust possibilistic programming for multi-item EOQ model with defective supply batches: whale optimization and water cycle algorithms. Neural Comput Appl 31:6587–6614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3492-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Erdogan S, Miller-Hooks E (2012) A green vehicle routing problem. Transp Res Part E Log Transp Rev 48:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Artmeier A, Haselmayr J, Leucker M et al (2010) The shortest path problem revisited: optimal routing for electric vehicles. In: 33rd annual German conference on AI, 2010, pp 309–316

  19. Zhang S, Gajpal Y, Appadoo SS et al (2018) Electric vehicle routing problem with recharging stations for minimizing energy consumption. Int J Prod Econ 203:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goeke D, Schneider M (2015) Routing a mixed fleet of electric and conventional vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 245:81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.01.049

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pelletier S, Jabali O, Laporte G (2016) 50th anniversary invited article—goods distribution with electric vehicles: review and research perspectives. Transp Sci 50:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barre A, Deguilhem B, Grolleau S et al (2013) A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications. J Power Sources 241:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang J, Sun H (2015) Battery swap station location-routing problem with capacitated electric vehicles. Comput Oper Res 55:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.07.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou BH, Tan F (2018) Electric vehicle handling routing and battery swap station location optimisation for automotive assembly lines. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 31:978–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2018.1493229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hof J, Schneider M, Goeke D (2017) Solving the battery swap station location-routing problem with capacitated electric vehicles using an AVNS algorithm for vehicle-routing problems with intermediate stops. Transp Res Part B Methodol 97:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakraborty N, Mondal A, Mondal S (2018) Multi-objective heuristic charge scheduling and eco-routing mechanism for electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on future energy systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3208903.3212065

  27. Rezgui D, Bouziri H, Aggoune-Mtalaa W et al (2018) A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for smart freight delivery with electric modular vehicles. In: 15th IEEE/ACS international conference on computer systems and applications, 2018.

  28. Desaulniers G, Errico F, Irnich S et al (2016) Exact algorithms for electric vehicle-routing problems with time windows. Oper Res 64:1388–1405. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1535

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Andelmin J, Bartolini E (2017) An exact algorithm for the green vehicle routing problem. Transp Sci 51:1288–1303. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo Z, Yang L, Jiang X, et al (2017) The electric vehicle routing problem with time windows using genetic algorithm. In: 2017 IEEE 2nd advanced information technology, electronic and automation control conference (IAEAC), 2017

  31. Wang Q, Peng S, Liu S (2020) Optimization of electric vehicle routing problem using Tabu search. In: 2020 Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), 2020

  32. Koc C, Karaoglan I (2016) The green vehicle routing problem: a heuristic based exact solution approach. Appl Soft Comput 39:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hiermann G, Puchinger J, Ropke S et al (2016) The electric fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Eur J Oper Res 252:995–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.038

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Florio AM, Hartl RF, Minner S (2020) New exact algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Transp Sci 54:1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2020.0976

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang L, Lu J (2019) A memetic algorithm with competition for the capacitated green vehicle routing problem. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin 6:516–526. https://doi.org/10.1109/jas.2019.1911405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abousleiman R, Rawashdeh O (2014) Tabu search based solution to the electric vehicle energy efficient routing problem. In: Transportation electrification conference & expo, 2014.

  37. Mavrovouniotis M, Li C, Ellinas G et al (2018) Ant colony optimization for the electric vehicle routing problem. In: 2019 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI)

  38. Abousleiman R, Rawashdeh O (2016) Electric vehicle modelling and energy-efficient routing using particle swarm optimisation. IET Intell Transp Syst 10:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Abousleiman R, Rawashdeh O (2014) Energy-efficient routing for electric vehicles using metaheuristic optimization frameworks. In: Mediterranean electrotechnical conference

  40. Barco J, Guerra A, Muñoz L et al (2017) Optimal routing and scheduling of charge for electric vehicles: a case study. Math Probl Eng 2017:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8509783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ewbank H, Wanke P, Hadi-Vencheh A (2015) An unsupervised fuzzy clustering approach to the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Neural Comput Appl 27:857–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1901-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hosseinabadi AAR, Vahidi J, Balas VE et al (2016) OVRP_GELS: solving open vehicle routing problem using the gravitational emulation local search algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 29:955–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2608-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Montoya A, Guéret C, Mendoza JE et al (2017) The electric vehicle routing problem with nonlinear charging function. Transp Res Part B Methodol 103:87–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tong W (2020) A new whale optimisation algorithm based on self-adapting parameter adjustment and mix mutation strategy. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 33:949–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2020.1736717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abed-alguni B, Klaib A (2020) Hybrid whale optimisation and β-hill climbing algorithm for continuous optimisation problems. Int J Comput Sci Math 12:350. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSM.2020.112650

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Alguni BHA, Klaib AF, Nahar KMO (2019) Island-based whale optimisation algorithm for continuous optimisation problems. Int J Reason Based Intell Syst 11:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijris.2019.103525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N et al (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50:174–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.978374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou BH, Shen CY (2018) Multi-objective optimization of material delivery for mixed model assembly lines with energy consideration. J Clean Prod 192:293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L (2000) Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol Comput 8:173–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365600568202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Piotr C et al (1998) Pareto simulated annealing—a metaheuristic technique for multiple-objective combinatorial optimization. J Multi Criteria Decis Anal 7:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199801)7:1%3c34::AID-MCDA161%3e3.0.CO;2-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Emde S, Boysen N (2012) Optimally routing and scheduling tow trains for JIT-supply of mixed-model assembly lines. Eur J Oper Res 217:287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.013

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Hafiz F, Swain A, Patel N et al (2018) A two-dimensional (2-D) learning framework for Particle Swarm based feature selection. Pattern Recognit J Pattern Recognit Soc 76:416–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2017.11.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lin Y, Jiang YS, Gong YJ et al (2019) A discrete multiobjective particle swarm optimizer for automated assembly of parallel cognitive diagnosis tests. IEEE Trans Cybern 49:2792–2805. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2836388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li J, Chen W, Zhang J et al. (2015) A parallel implementation of multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on decomposition. In: 2015 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2015.187

  56. Wei P, Zhang Q (2008) A decomposition-based multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for continuous optimization problems. In: The 2008 IEEE international conference on granular computing

  57. Zhou BH, Liao X (2020) Particle filter and Levy flight-based decomposed multi-objective evolution hybridized particle swarm for flexible job shop greening scheduling with crane transportation. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71471135).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Industrial Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, People’s Republic of China

    Binghai Zhou & Zhe Zhao

Authors
  1. Binghai Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhe Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binghai Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, B., Zhao, Z. Multi-objective optimization of electric vehicle routing problem with battery swap and mixed time windows. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 7325–7348 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-06967-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-06967-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation