Skip to main content
Log in

Development of accurate automated language identification model using polymer pattern and tent maximum absolute pooling techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various language identification tools and methods have been used in the real world. These applications can detect language using text or images. However, there is no speech-based language automated identification tool available. Therefore, many studies have been presented to overcome this problem. This work presents an automated high accurate language identification model and developed a new corpus for language identification. The developed language identification model uses two novel methods: (i) polymer pattern (PP) and (ii) tent maximum absolute pooling (TMAP). These methods help to extract both low- and high-frequency features. In order to choose the most informative features, a threshold-based iterative feature selector is presented. The proposed PP- and TMAP-based model has attained an accuracy of 97.87% and 99.70% using our newly developed and VoxForge datasets, respectively, with kNN classifier with tenfold cross-validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenthal S, Atanasova P, Karadzhov G, Zampieri M, Nakov P (2020) A large-scale semi-supervised dataset for offensive language identification. arXiv preprint

  2. Takçi H, Ekinci E (2012) Minimal feature set in language identification and finding suitable classification method with it. Procedia Technol 1:444–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Habic V, Semenov A, Pasiliao EL (2020) Multitask deep learning for native language identification. Knowl Based Syst 209:106440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guha S, Das A, Singh PK, Ahmadian A, Senu N, Sarkar R (2020) Hybrid feature selection method based on harmony search and naked mole-rat algorithms for spoken language identification from audio signals. IEEE Access 8:182868–182887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee H, Obaidullah SM, Santosh K, Phadikar S, Roy K (2020) A lazy learning-based language identification from speech using MFCC-2 features. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 11(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdullah B, Avgustinova T, Möbius B, Klakow D (2020) Cross-domain adaptation of spoken language identification for related languages: the curious case of slavic languages. arXiv preprint

  7. Shen P, Lu X, Li S, Kawai H (2020) Knowledge distillation-based representation learning for short-utterance spoken language identification. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 28:2674–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes B, Baldwin T, Bird S, Nicholson J, MacKinlay A (2006) Reconsidering language identification for written language resources

  9. Li H, Ma B, Lee C-H (2006) A vector space modeling approach to spoken language identification. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 15(1):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong R, Ma B, Zhu D, Li H, Chng ES (2006) Integrating acoustic, prosodic and phonotactic features for spoken language identification. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on acoustics speech and signal processing proceedings. IEEE, pp I-I

  11. Teixeira C, Trancoso I, Serralheiro A (1996) Accent identification. In: proceeding of fourth international conference on spoken language processing. ICSLP'96. IEEE, pp 1784–1787

  12. Irtza S, Sethu V, Ambikairajah E, Li H (2018) Using language cluster models in hierarchical language identification. Speech Commun 100:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Monteiro J, Alam J, Falk TH (2019) Residual convolutional neural network with attentive feature pooling for end-to-end language identification from short-duration speech. Comput Speech Lang 58:364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xue J, Li B, Yan R, Gruen JR, Feng T, Joanisse MF, Malins JG (2020) The temporal dynamics of first and second language processing: ERPs to spoken words in Mandarin-English bilinguals. Neuropsychologia 146:107562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Poncelet J, Renkens V (2020) Low resource end-to-end spoken language understanding with capsule networks. Comput Speech Lang 66:101142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deshwal D, Sangwan P, Kumar D (2020) A language identification system using hybrid features and back-propagation neural network. Appl Acoust 164:107289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2017) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM 60(6):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raghu S, Sriraam N (2018) Classification of focal and non-focal EEG signals using neighborhood component analysis and machine learning algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 113:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Montavon G (2009) Deep learning for spoken language identification. In: NIPS workshop on deep learning for speech recognition and related applications. Citeseer, pp 1–4

  20. VoxForge (2020) VoxForge, free speech recognition, www.voxforge.org

  21. . Lounnas K, Abbas M, Teffahi H, Lichouri M (2019) A language identification system based on voxforge speech corpus. In: international conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications. Springer, pp 529-534

  22. Kumar P, Biswas A, Mishra AN, Chandra M (2010) Spoken language identification using hybrid feature extraction methods. arXiv preprint

  23. Cui H, Liu A, Zhang X, Chen X, Wang K, Chen X (2020) EEG-based emotion recognition using an end-to-end regional-asymmetric convolutional neural network. Knowl Based Syst 205:106243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vuddagiri RK, Vydana HK, Vuppala AK (2018) Curriculum learning based approach for noise robust language identification using DNN with attention. Expert Syst Appl 110:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mounika K, Achanta S, Lakshmi H, Gangashetty SV, Vuppala AK (2016) An investigation of deep neural network architectures for language recognition in indian languages. In: INTERSPEECH. pp 2930–2933

  26. Tang Z, Wang D, Chen Y, Chen Q (2017) AP17-OLR challenge: data, plan, and baseline. In: 2017 Asia-Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE, pp 749–753

  27. Wang D, Li L, Tang D, Chen Q (2016) Ap16-ol7: A multilingual database for oriental languages and a language recognition baseline. In: 2016 Asia-Pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA). IEEE, pp 1–5

  28. Dutta AK, Rao KS (2018) Language identification using phase information. Int J Speech Technol 21(3):509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maity S, Vuppala AK, Rao KS, Nandi D (2012) IITKGP-MLILSC speech database for language identification. In: 2012 national conference on communications (NCC). IEEE, pp 1–5

  30. Muthusamy YK, Cole RA, Oshika BT (1992) The OGI multi-language telephone speech corpus. In: second international conference on spoken language processing

  31. Tang Z, Wang D, Song L (2019) AP19-OLR Challenge: three tasks and their baselines. In: 2019 Asia-pacific signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA ASC), IEEE, pp 1917–1921

  32. Revay S, Teschke M (2019) Multiclass language identification using deep learning on spectral images of audio signals. arXiv preprint

  33. Bhanja CC, Laskar MA, Laskar RH (2019) A pre-classification-based language identification for Northeast Indian languages using prosody and spectral features. Circuits Syst Signal Process 38(5):2266–2296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baba M, Imamura T, Hoshikawa N, Nakayama H, Ito T, Shiraki A (2020) Development of a multilingual digital signage system using a directional volumetric display and language identification. OSA Continuum 3(11):3187–3196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Blanchard D, Tetreault J, Higgins D, Cahill A, Chodorow M (2013) TOEFL11: A corpus of non‐native English. ETS Research Report Series 2013 (2):i-15

  36. Granger S, Dagneaux E, Meunier F, Paquot M (2002) International corpus of learner english, (ICLE). Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yasmin G, Das AK, Nayak J, Pelusi D, Ding W (2020) Graph based feature selection investigating boundary region of rough set for language identification. Expert Syst Appl 158:113575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reddy VR, Maity S, Rao KS (2013) Identification of Indian languages using multi-level spectral and prosodic features. Int J Speech Technol 16(4):489–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sisodia DS, Nikhil S, Kiran GS, Sathvik P (2020) Ensemble learners for identification of spoken languages using mel frequency cepstral coefficients. In: 2nd international conference on data, engineering and applications (IDEA). IEEE, pp 1–5

  40. Verma M, Buduru AB (2020) Fine-grained language identification with multilingual capsNet Model. In: 2020 IEEE sixth international conference on multimedia big data (BigMM), IEEE, pp 94–102

  41. Hou W, Dong Y, Zhuang B, Yang L, Shi J, Shinozaki T (2020) Large-scale end-to-end multilingual speech recognition and language identification with multi-task learning. Babel 37(4k):10k

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fan W, Ma Y, Li Q, He Y, Zhao E, Tang J, Yin D (2019) Graph neural networks for social recommendation. In: The World Wide Web Conference, pp 417–426

  43. Bianchi FM, Grattarola D, Livi L, Alippi C (2021) Graph neural networks with convolutional arma filters. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3054830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Levie R, Monti F, Bresson X, Bronstein MM (2018) Cayleynets: graph convolutional neural networks with complex rational spectral filters. IEEE Trans Signal Process 67(1):97–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Such FP, Sah S, Dominguez MA, Pillai S, Zhang C, Michael A, Cahill ND, Ptucha R (2017) Robust spatial filtering with graph convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 11(6):884–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vries RD (2021) Perspective on AlphaFold 2 and advances in computational protein folding predictions.

  47. Tuncer T (2021) A new stable nonlinear textural feature extraction method based EEG signal classification method using substitution Box of the Hamsi hash function: Hamsi pattern. Appl Acoust 172:107607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tuncer T, Dogan S, Özyurt F, Belhaouari SB, Bensmail H (2020) Novel multi center and threshold ternary pattern based method for disease detection method using voice. IEEE Access 8:84532–84540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Maillo J, Ramírez S, Triguero I, Herrera F (2017) kNN-IS: an Iterative Spark-based design of the k-Nearest Neighbors classifier for big data. Knowl-Based Syst 117:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao W, Chellappa R, Nandhakumar N (1998) Empirical performance analysis of linear discriminant classifiers. In: Proceedings. 1998 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (Cat. No. 98CB36231), IEEE, pp 164–169

  51. Vapnik V (1998) The support vector method of function estimation. In: Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (eds) Nonlinear modeling. Springer, pp 55–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Vapnik V (2013) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Tuncer T, Dogan S, Pławiak P, Acharya UR (2019) Automated arrhythmia detection using novel hexadecimal local pattern and multilevel wavelet transform with ECG signals. Knowl Based Syst 186:104923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chicco D, Jurman G (2020) The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics 21(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Warrens MJ (2008) On the equivalence of Cohen’s kappa and the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index. J Classif 25(2):177–183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Turker Tuncer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuncer, T., Dogan, S., Akbal, E. et al. Development of accurate automated language identification model using polymer pattern and tent maximum absolute pooling techniques. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 4875–4888 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06678-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06678-0

Keywords

Navigation