Skip to main content
Log in

Use of GMDH-type neural network to model the mechanical behavior of a cement-treated sand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 29 October 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Sand–cement stabilization is considered as one of the most common in situ methods in the soil improvement practices. Despite the importance of studying some fundamental characteristics such as the stress (q)–strain (\(\varepsilon\)) and the pore pressure (u)–strain (\(\varepsilon\)) behavior of the stabilized soils, very few studies have examined this so far. Hence, this paper aims at adopting an initiative approach which is group method of data handling (GMDH)-type neural network to specifically predict such behavior for cement-treated sands using the consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial test results. To do so, the q\(\varepsilon\) and u\(\varepsilon\) results from the CU tests are considered on the basis of different variables such as cement content (C), confining pressure (CP), porosity (\(\eta\)) and curing time (D). The obtained data, regarding similar statistical characteristics, are randomly sorted into three groups namely training, validation and testing. Current modeling is based on the first group (80% of the data), whereas the comparisons are made among other approaches in terms of the last one. Moreover, to achieve more accurate predictions, parameters related to the stress (\(q_{n - 1}\)) and pore pressure (\(u_{n - 1}\)) in the previous strain level are assumed in the modeling. It can be concluded that the two-hidden layer model is capable of accurately predicting the q\(\varepsilon\) and u\(\varepsilon\) behavior for the testing data, compared to other machine learning methods. By and large, GMDH modeling is strongly suggested as a potent method to estimate the soil mechanical properties like brittle index (IB), maximum strength (qmax), failure strain \((\varepsilon_{{\text{f}}} )\) and stiffness (E50).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Onishi K, Tsukamoto Y, Saito R, Chiyoda T (2010) Strength and small-strain modulus of lightweight geomaterials: cement-stabilised sand mixed with compressible expanded polystyrene beads. Geosynth Int 17:380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MolaAbasi H, Kordtabar B, Kordnaeij A (2017) Parameters controlling strength of zeolite–cement–sand mixture. Int J Geotech Eng 11:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yilmaz E, Belem T, Benzaazoua M (2015) Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions. Eng Geol 185:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ismael NF, Mollah MA (1998) Leaching effects on properties of cemented sands in Kuwait. J Geotech geoenvironmental Eng 124:997–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MolaAbasi H, Semsani SN, Saberian M et al (2020) Evaluation of the long-term performance of stabilized sandy soil using binary mixtures: a micro-and macro-level approach. J Clean Prod 267:122209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Consoli NC, Foppa D (2014) Porosity/cement ratio controlling initial bulk modulus and incremental yield stress of an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotech Lett 4:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamshidi Chenari R, Fatahi B, Ghorbani A, Alamoti MN (2018) Evaluation of strength properties of cement stabilized sand mixed with EPS beads and fly ash. Geomech Eng 14:533–544

    Google Scholar 

  8. MolaAbasi H, Khajeh A, Naderi Semsani S (2018) Effect of the ratio between porosity and SiO2 and Al2O3 on tensile strength of zeolite-cemented sands. J Mater Civ Eng 30:4018–4028

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sabat AK (2013) Prediction of California bearing ratio of a soil stabilized with lime and quarry dust using artificial neural network. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:3261–3272

    Google Scholar 

  10. Consoli NC, Festugato L, da Rocha CG, Cruz RC (2013) Key parameters for strength control of rammed sand–cement mixtures: Influence of types of portland cement. Constr Build Mater 49:591–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech geoenvironmental Eng 133:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Consoli N et al (2009) Key parameters dictating strength of lime/cement-treated soils. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng 162:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MolaAbasi H, Khajeh A, Naderi Semsani S (2017) Effect of the ratio between porosity and SiO2 and Al2O3 on tensile strength of zeolite-cemented sands. J Mater Civ Eng 30:04018028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. MolaAbasi H, Khajeh A, Naderi Semsani S (2017) Variables controlling tensile strength of stabilized sand with cement and zeolite. J Adhes Sci Technol 32:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  15. MolaAbasi H, Shooshpasha I (2016) Influence of zeolite and cement additions on mechanical behavior of sandy soil. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MolaAbasi H, Saberian M, Kordnaeij A et al (2019) Predicting the stress-strain behaviour of zeolite-cemented sand based on the unconfined compression test using GMDH type neural network. J Adhes Sci Technol 33:945–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Javdanian H, Lee S (2019) Evaluating unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soils stabilized with geopolymer: a computational intelligence approach. Eng Comput 35:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dutta RK, Singh A, Gnananandarao T (2019) Prediction of free swell index for the expansive soil using artificial neural networks. J Soft Comput Civ Eng 3:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  19. Onur MI, Umu SU, Okur V, Tuncan M (2017) An approach to determine the initial shear modulus of clean sandy soils. Glob J Res Eng 17:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  20. Amar MN, Ghahfarokhi AJ (2020) Prediction of CO2 diffusivity in brine using white-box machine learning. J Pet Sci Eng 190:107037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo J, Wang H, Guo F et al (2019) The back propagation based on the modified group method of data-handling network for oilfield production forecasting. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 9:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steiner M, Schneider S (1998) Time varying risk premia. In: Decision technologies for computational finance. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–48

  23. Moayed RZ, Kordnaeij A, MolaAbasi H (2017) Compressibility indices of saturated clays by group method of data handling and genetic algorithms. Neural Comput Appl 28:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eslami A, MolaAbasi H, Shourijeh PT (2014) A polynomial model for predicting liquefaction potential from cone penetration test data. Sci Iran Trans A Civ Eng 21:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  25. Naeini SA, Moayed RZ, Kordnaeij A, MolaAbasi H (2018) Elasticity modulus of clayey deposits estimation using group method of data handling type neural network. Measurement 121:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MolaAbasi H, Shooshpasha I (2016) Prediction of zeolite-cement-sand unconfined compressive strength using polynomial neural network. Eur Phys J Plus 131:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. MolaAbasi H, Khajeh A, Naderi Semsani S, Kordnaeij A (2019) Prediction of zeolite-cemented sand tensile strength by GMDH type neural network. J Adhes Sci Technol 15:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  28. MolaAbasi H, Eslami A (2018) Prediction of drained soil shear strength parameters of marine deposit from CPTu data using GMDH-type neural network. Mar Georesources Geotechnol 37:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  29. Materials AS for T and (1993) Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM D 2487 West Conshohocken

  30. MolaAbasi H (2016) Laboratory investigation on mechanical behavior of babolsar sand stabilized with cement and zeolite. Babol Noshivani University, Babol

    Google Scholar 

  31. ASTM D-4746 D (2004) D 4767-04: Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM Int, West Conshohocken, Pa

  32. MolaAbasi H, Saberian M, Semsani SN et al (2018) Triaxial behaviour of zeolite-cemented sand. Proc Inst Civ Eng Improv 173:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao H, Huang Z, Zou Z (2014) Simulating the stress-strain relationship of geomaterials by support vector machine. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dash R, Dash PK (2017) MDHS-LPNN: a hybrid FOREX predictor model using a legendre polynomial neural network with a modified differential harmony search technique. In: Handbook of neural computation. Elsevier, pp 459–486

  35. "MATLAB User’s Guide: R2017a Documentation,” MathWorks Inc, Natick, MA, USA, 2017

  36. Xiao J, Jia Y, Jiang X, Wang S (2020) Circular complex-valued gMDH-type neural network for real-valued classification problems. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst 31:5285–5299

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Lamrani I, Banerjee A, Gupta SKS (2020) Toward operational safety verification via hybrid automata mining using I/O traces of AI-enabled CPS. In: CEUR workshop proceedings. CEUR-WS, pp 186–194

  38. Consoli NC, de Moraes RR, Festugato L (2012) Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of fiber-reinforced cemented soil. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1568–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aghileh Khajeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MolaAbasi, H., Khajeh, A. & Jamshidi Chenari, R. Use of GMDH-type neural network to model the mechanical behavior of a cement-treated sand. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 15305–15318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06157-6

Keywords

Navigation