Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Routing optimization strategy of IoT awareness layer based on improved cat swarm algorithm

  • Special Issue on Multi-modal Information Learning and Analytics on Big Data
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet of Things technology, wireless sensor networks have been widely used in many places. This study mainly discusses the routing optimization strategy of the IoT perceptive layer based on the improved cat swarm algorithm. This study simulates a perceptive network with 100 nodes deployed randomly. As SDWSN for Internet of Things applications, in order to simulate the data transmission requirements of IoT communication and ensure the fairness of experimental comparison, this study uses the pseudo-random mechanism to generate the source address and destination address of data packets. A special SDN controller node is added to the network. The SDN controller node broadcasts information to each sensing node, and the common sensing node sends node information to the SDN controller. The SDN controller can survive the global time graph of the entire network according to the information of the common node. In order to avoid the problem of high energy consumption of cluster heads caused by long-distance data transmission, the cat algorithm protocol adopts multi-hop communication between cluster heads and BS and uses network overhead index to quantify link overhead as the basis for cluster heads to select the next hop node. When the inter-cluster multi-hop route is successfully established, the wireless sensor node begins to collect data and send it to BS node. Six monitoring nodes, two coordinators and one workstation were selected as the test objects. The data volume sent by each node was 2000, and the accuracy rate of test transmission information at different rates and transmission distances was determined. The group network coverage rate of cat swarm algorithm is always above 95%, and the average energy loss of nodes is the highest and less than 36%. The results show that the aggregate of energy consumption of cluster heads and the variance of energy consumption are the lowest in the improved cat cluster algorithm, which ensures the reliable transmission of node data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shifa A, Asghar M, Fleury M (2016) Multimedia security perspectives in IoT. J Inf Secur Res 7(4):150–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen CH, Lin MY, Liu CC (2018) Edge computing gateway of the industrial internet of things using multiple collaborative microcontrollers. IEEE Netw 32(1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishra AK, Tripathy AK, Puthal D et al (2019) Analytical model for sybil attack phases in internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 6(1):379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou J, Cao Z, Dong X et al (2017) Security and privacy for cloud-based IoT: challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 55(1):26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Centenaro M, Vangelista L, Zanella A et al (2016) Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wirel Commun 23(5):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ronen E, Shamir A, Weingarten AO et al (2018) IoT goes nuclear: creating a ZigBee chain reaction. IEEE Secur Priv 16(1):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gope P, Hwang T (2016) BSN-care: a secure IoT-based modern healthcare system using body sensor network. IEEE Sens J 16(5):1368–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulz P, Matthe M, Klessig H et al (2016) Latency critical IoT applications in 5G: perspective on the design of radio interface and network architecture. IEEE Commun Mag 55(2):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adi E, Anwar A, Baig Z et al (2020) Machine learning and data analytics for the IoT. Neural Comput Appl 32:16205–16233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gozalvez J (2016) New 3GPP standard for IoT [mobile radio]. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 11(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qu T, Lei SP, Wang ZZ et al (2016) IoT-based real-time production logistics synchronization system under smart cloud manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(1–4):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brogi A, Forti S (2017) QoS-aware deployment of IoT applications through the fog. IEEE Internet Things J 4(5):1185–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin K, Chen M, Deng J et al (2016) Enhanced fingerprinting and trajectory prediction for IoT localization in smart buildings. IEEE Trans Autom Eng 13(3):1294–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolias C, Kambourakis G, Stavrou A et al (2017) DDoS in the IoT: Mirai and other botnets. Computer 50(7):80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiang M, Zhang T, Fog and IoT (2017) An overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J 3(6):854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinha RS, Wei Y, Hwang SH (2017) A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT. Ict Express 3(1):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan J, Gao D, Yang D et al (2017) An energy-aware trust derivation scheme with game theoretic approach in wireless sensor networks for IoT Applications. IEEE Internet Things J 1(1):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H, Ota K, Dong M (2018) Learning IoT in edge: deep learning for the internet of things with edge computing. IEEE Netw 32(1):96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Minoli D, Sohraby K, Occhiogrosso B (2017) IoT considerations, requirements, and architectures for smart buildings—energy optimization and next-generation building management systems. IEEE Internet Things J 4(1):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Z, Cheng C, Sugumaran V (2020) Big data analytics of crime prevention and control based on image processing upon cloud computing. J Surveill Secur Saf 1:16–33

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cai H, Xu B, Jiang L et al (2017) IoT-based big data storage systems in cloud computing: perspectives and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J 4(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong L, Khan MK, Wu F et al (2017) Millimeter-wave wireless communications for IoT-cloud supported autonomous vehicles: overview, design, and challenges. IEEE Commun Mag 55(1):62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alletto S, Cucchiara R, Fiore GD et al (2016) An indoor location-aware system for an iot-based smart museum. IEEE Internet Things J 3(2):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song T, Li R, Mei B et al (2017) A privacy preserving communication protocol for IoT applications in smart homes. IEEE Internet Things J 4(6):1844–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tewari A, Gupta BB (2017) Cryptanalysis of a novel ultra-lightweight mutual authentication protocol for IoT devices using RFID tags. J Supercomput 73(3):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Perera C, Talagala DS, Liu CH et al (2016) Energy-efficient location and activity-aware on-demand mobile distributed sensing platform for sensing as a service in IoT clouds. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst 2(4):171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gharbieh M, Elsawy H, Bader A et al (2017) Spatiotemporal stochastic modeling of IoT enabled cellular networks: scalability and stability analysis. IEEE Trans Commun 65(8):3585–3600

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verma S, Kawamoto Y, Fadlullah ZM et al (2017) A survey on network methodologies for real-time analytics of massive IoT data and open research issues. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 19(3):1457–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2020JJ4757)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410000, Hunan, China

    Xiang Xiao & Ming Zhao

Authors
  1. Xiang Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the research article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, X., Zhao, M. Routing optimization strategy of IoT awareness layer based on improved cat swarm algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 34, 3311–3322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05590-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05590-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation