Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated intelligent computing paradigm for nonlinear multi-singular third-order Emden–Fowler equation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an advance computational intelligence scheme is designed and implemented to solve third-order nonlinear multiple singular systems represented with Emden–Fowler differential equation (EFDE) by exploiting the efficacy of artificial neural networks (ANNs), genetic algorithms (GAs) and active-set algorithm (ASA), i.e., ANN–GA–ASA. In the scheme, ANNs are used to discretize the EFDE for formulation of mean squared error-based fitness function. The optimization task for ANN models of nonlinear multi-singular system is performed by integrated competency GA and ASA. The efficiency of the designed ANN–GA–ASA is examined by solving five different variants of the singular model to check the effectiveness, reliability and significance. The statistical investigations are also performed to authenticate the precision, accuracy and convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lane HJ (1870) On the theoretical temperature of the sun, under the hypothesis of a gaseous mass maintaining its volume by its internal heat and depending on the laws of gases as known to terrestrial experiment. Am J Sci 148:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emden R (1907) Gaskugeln Teubner. Leipzig und Berlin

  3. Ahmad I et al (2017) Neural network methods to solve the Lane–Emden type equations arising in thermodynamic studies of the spherical gas cloud model. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):929–944

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baleanu D, Sajjadi SS, Jajarmi A, Asad JH (2019) New features of the fractional Euler–Lagrange equations for a physical system within non-singular derivative operator. Eur Phys J Plus 134(4):181

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luo T, Xin Z, Zeng H (2016) Nonlinear asymptotic stability of the Lane–Emden solutions for the viscous gaseous star problem with degenerate density dependent viscosities. Commun Math Phys 347(3):657–702

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Rach R, Duan JS, Wazwaz AM (2014) Solving coupled Lane–Emden boundary value problems in catalytic diffusion reactions by the Adomian decomposition method. J Math Chem 52(1):255–267

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Boubaker K, Van Gorder RA (2012) Application of the BPES to Lane–Emden equations governing polytropic and isothermal gas spheres. New Astron 17(6):565–569

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taghavi A, Pearce S (2013) A solution to the Lane–Emden equation in the theory of stellar structure utilizing the Tau method. Math Methods Appl Sci 36(10):1240–1247

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan JA et al (2015) Nature-inspired computing approach for solving non-linear singular Emden-Fowler problem arising in electromagnetic theory. Connect Sci 27(4):377–396

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhrawy AH, Alofi AS, Van Gorder RA (2014) An efficient collocation method for a class of boundary value problems arising in mathematical physics and geometry. In: Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol 2014. Hindawi Publishing Corporation

  11. Ramos JI (2003) Linearization methods in classical and quantum mechanics. Comput Phys Commun 153(2):199–208

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dehghan M, Shakeri F (2008) Solution of an integro-differential equation arising in oscillating magnetic fields using He’s homotopy perturbation method. Prog Electromagn Res 78:361–376

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radulescu V, Repovs D (2012) Combined effects in nonlinear problems arising in the study of anisotropic continuous media. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 75(3):1524–1530

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Flockerzi D, Sundmacher K (2011) On coupled Lane–Emden equations arising in dusty fluid models. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol 268, no 1. IOP Publishing, p 012006

  15. Ghergu M, Radulescu V (2007) On a class of singular Gierer-Meinhardt systems arising in morphogenesis. Comptes Rendus Mathématique 344(3):163–168

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wazwaz AM (2015) Solving two Emden–Fowler type equations of third order by the variational iteration method. Appl Math Inf Sci 9(5):2429

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shawagfeh NT (1993) Non perturbative approximate solution for Lane–Emden equation. J Math Phys 34(9):4364–4369

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wazwaz AM (2001) A new algorithm for solving differential equations of Lane–Emden type. Appl Math Comput 118(2):287–310

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao S (2003) A new analytic algorithm of Lane–Emden type equations. Appl Math Comput 142(1):1–16

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. He JH, Ji FY (2019) Taylor series solution for Lane–Emden equation. J Math Chem 57(8):1932–1934

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nouh MI (2004) Accelerated power series solution of polytropic and isothermal gas spheres. New Astron 9(6):467–473

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mandelzweig VB, Tabakin F (2001) Quasilinearization approach to nonlinear problems in physics with application to nonlinear ODEs. Comput Phys Commun 141(2):268–281

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmad I et al (2019) Novel applications of intelligent computing paradigms for the analysis of nonlinear reactive transport model of the fluid in soft tissues and microvessels. Neural Comput Appl 31(12):9041–9059

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fateh MF et al (2019) Differential evolution based computation intelligence solver for elliptic partial differential equations. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng 20(10):1445–1456

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmad I et al (2019) Design of computational intelligent procedure for thermal analysis of porous fin model. Chin J Phys 59:641–655

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Raja MAZ et al (2016) A new numerical approach to solve Thomas-Fermi model of an atom using bio-inspired heuristics integrated with sequential quadratic programming. Springer Plus 5(1):1400

    Google Scholar 

  27. Umar M et al (2019) Intelligent computing for numerical treatment of nonlinear prey–predator models. Appl Soft Comput 80:506–524

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Tariq M, Ahmad I (2018) Design of artificial neural network models optimized with sequential quadratic programming to study the dynamics of nonlinear Troesch’s problem arising in plasma physics. Neural Comput Appl 29(6):83–109

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jafarian A, Mokhtarpour M, Baleanu D (2017) Artificial neural network approach for a class of fractional ordinary differential equation. Neural Comput Appl 28(4):765–773

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Alaidarous ES, Syam MI (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic technique integrated with interior-point algorithm to analyze the dynamics of heartbeat model. Appl Soft Comput 52:605–629

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ghehsareh HR, Zaghian A, Zabetzadeh SM (2018) The use of local radial point interpolation method for solving two-dimensional linear fractional cable equation. Neural Comput Appl 29(10):745–754

    Google Scholar 

  32. Raja MAZ, Niazi SA, Butt SA (2017) An intelligent computing technique to analyze the vibrational dynamics of rotating electrical machine. Neurocomputing 219:280–299

    Google Scholar 

  33. He W, Chen Y, Yin Z (2016) Adaptive neural network control of an uncertain robot with full-state constraints. IEEE Trans Cybern 46(3):620–629

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schaff JC, Gao F, Li Y, Novak IL, Slepchenko BM (2016) Numerical approach to spatial deterministic-stochastic models arising in cell biology. PLoS Comput Biol 12(12):e1005236

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pelletier F, Masson C, Tahan A (2016) Wind turbine power curve modelling using artificial neural network. Renew Energy 89:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zameer A et al (2017) Intelligent and robust prediction of short term wind power using genetic programming based ensemble of neural networks. Energy Convers Manag 134:361–372

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zúñiga-Aguilar CJ, Coronel-Escamilla A, Gómez-Aguilar JF, Alvarado-Martínez VM, Romero-Ugalde HM (2018) New numerical approximation for solving fractional delay differential equations of variable order using artificial neural networks. Eur Phys J Plus 133(2):75

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rizaner FB, Rizaner A (2018) Approximate solutions of initial value problems for ordinary differential equations using radial basis function networks. Neural Process Lett 48(2):1063–1071

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ghasemi S, Nazemi A (2019) A fractional power series neural network for solving a class of fractional optimal control problems with equality and inequality constraints. Netw Comput Neural Syst 30(1–4):148–175

    Google Scholar 

  40. Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am 267(1):66–73

    Google Scholar 

  41. Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Muilti-objective optimization using no dominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2(3):221–248

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mehmood A et al (2019) Integrated computational intelligent paradigm for nonlinear electric circuit models using neural networks, genetic algorithms and sequential quadratic programming. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04573-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chang FS, Wu JS, Lee CN, Shen HC (2014) Greedy-search-based multi-objective genetic algorithm for emergency logistics scheduling. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):2947–2956

    Google Scholar 

  44. Majeed K et al (2017) A genetic algorithm optimized Morlet wavelet artificial neural network to study the dynamics of nonlinear Troesch’s system. Appl Soft Comput 56:420–435

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vaishnav P, Choudhary N, Jain K (2017) Traveling salesman problem using genetic algorithm: a survey. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng Inf Technol 2(3):105–108

    Google Scholar 

  46. Raja MAZ, Shah AA, Mehmood A, Chaudhary NI, Aslam MS (2018) Bio-inspired computational heuristics for parameter estimation of nonlinear Hammerstein controlled autoregressive system. Neural Comput Appl 29(12):1455–1474

    Google Scholar 

  47. Duvvuri SP, Anmala J (2019) Fecal coliform predictive model using genetic algorithm-based radial basis function neural networks (GA-RBFNNs). Neural Comput Appl 31(12):8393–8409

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mehmood A et al (2018) Design of neuro-computing paradigms for nonlinear nanofluidic systems of MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 91:57–85

    Google Scholar 

  49. Baroudi U, Bin-Yahya M, Alshammari M, Yaqoub U (2019) Ticket-based QoS routing optimization using genetic algorithm for WSN applications in smart grid. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(4):1325–1338

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mehmood A et al (2019) Integrated intelligent computing paradigm for the dynamics of micropolar fluid flow with heat transfer in a permeable walled channel. Appl Soft Comput 79:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  51. Neysiani BS, Soltani N, Mofidi R, Nadimi-Shahraki MH (2019) Improve performance of association rule-based collaborative filtering recommendation systems using genetic algorithm. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci 2:48–55

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi MA, Nazari MA, Mahian O, Ghasempour R (2019) A proposed model to predict thermal conductivity ratio of Al2O3/EG nanofluid by applying least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) and genetic algorithm as a connectionist approach. J Therm Anal Calorim 135(1):271–281

    Google Scholar 

  53. Deuerlein JW, Piller O, Elhay S, Simpson AR (2019) Content-based active-set method for the pressure-dependent model of water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 145(1):04018082

    Google Scholar 

  54. Azizi M, Amirfakhrian M, Araghi MAF (2019) A fuzzy system based active set algorithm for the numerical solution of the optimal control problem governed by partial differential equation. Eur J Control 54:99–110

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Koehler S, Danielson C, Borrelli F (2017) A primal-dual active-set method for distributed model predictive control. Optimal Control Appl Methods 38(3):399–419

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang X, Pardalos PM (2017) A modified active set algorithm for transportation discrete network design bi-level problem. J Glob Optim 67(1–2):325–342

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Shen C, Zhang LH, Yang WH (2016) A filter active-set algorithm for ball/sphere constrained optimization problem. SIAM J Optim 26(3):1429–1464

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Stam CJ, Reijneveld JC (2007) Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 1(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(3):186–198

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cao J, Xiao M (2007) Stability and Hopf bifurcation in a simplified BAM neural network with two time delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 18(2):416–430

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Zameer A, Khan NA, Manzar MA (2019) Numerical treatment of nonlinear singular Flierl-Petviashivili systems using neural networks models. Neural Comput Appl 31:2371–2394

    Google Scholar 

  62. Munir A, Manzar MA, Khan NA, Raja MAZ (2019) Intelligent computing approach to analyze the dynamics of wire coating with Oldroyd 8-constant fluid. Neural Comput Appl 31(3):751–775

    Google Scholar 

  63. Raja MAZ, Mehmood J, Sabir Z, Nasab AK, Manzar MA (2019) Numerical solution of doubly singular nonlinear systems using neural networks-based integrated intelligent computing. Neural Comput Appl 31(3):793–812

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan

    Zulqurnain Sabir & Muhammad Umar

  2. Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Technical University of Cartagena, Hospital de Marina, 30203, Cartagena, Spain

    Juan L. G. Guirao

  3. Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Attock, 43600, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shoaib

  4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Attock, 43600, Pakistan

    Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja

Authors
  1. Zulqurnain Sabir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Umar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan L. G. Guirao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Muhammad Shoaib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan L. G. Guirao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, Z., Umar, M., Guirao, J.L.G. et al. Integrated intelligent computing paradigm for nonlinear multi-singular third-order Emden–Fowler equation. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 3417–3436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05187-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05187-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation