Skip to main content
Log in

Neural image reconstruction using a heuristic validation mechanism

  • S. I : Hybridization of Neural Computing with Nature Inspired Algorithms
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image reconstruction is a mathematical process, where the image is compressed into a small representation and derived from this form. The general use of the reconstruction technique finds a place in noise removal from images obtained in medicine or other areas of life. In this paper, we propose a heuristic validation mechanism for training different types of neural networks in the problem of image reconstruction. The main idea is based on finding some important areas on image by heuristic algorithm and train network until a certain level of entropy of these areas is achieved. The mathematical model of this technique is described and supported by experimental results on different datasets with complex analysis of different heuristics. Proposed approach shows that it can reduce the average time of training process using convolutional neural networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atlason HE, Love A, Sigurdsson S, Gudnason V, Ellingsen LM (2019) Unsupervised brain lesion segmentation from mri using a convolutional autoencoder. In: Medical Imaging 2019: Image Processing, vol 10949, p 109491H. International Society for Optics and Photonics

  2. Belthangady C, Royer LA (2019) Applications, promises, and pitfalls of deep learning for fluorescence image reconstruction. Nat Methods 16:1215–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen M, Shi X, Zhang Y, Wu D, Guizani M (2017) Deep features learning for medical image analysis with convolutional autoencoder neural network. IEEE Trans Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2717439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietze M, Branderhorst W, Viergever M, De Jong H (2019) Accelerated spect image reconstruction with a convolutional neural network. J Nucl Med 60(supplement 1):1351–1351

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elsayed SM, Sarker RA, Essam DL (2013) A genetic algorithm for solving the cec’2013 competition problems on real-parameter optimization. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation, pp 356–360. IEEE

  6. Gao Y, Liang Z, Moore W, Zhang H, Pomeroy MJ, Ferretti JA, Bilfinger TV, Ma J, Lu H (2019) A feasibility study of extracting tissue textures from a previous full-dose ct database as prior knowledge for bayesian reconstruction of current low-dose ct images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(8):1981–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gondara L (2016) Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoders. In: 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW), pp 241–246. IEEE

  8. Inam O, Qureshi M, Akram H, Omer H, Laraib Z (2019) Accelerating parallel magnetic resonance image reconstruction on graphics processing units using cuda. In: 2019 IEEE 2nd international conference on information and computer technologies (ICICT), pp 109–113. IEEE

  9. Kang C, Yu X, Wang S-H, Guttery D, Pandey H, Tian Y, Zhang Y (2020) A heuristic neural network structure relying on fuzzy logic for images scoring. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2966163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980

  11. Krizhevsky A, Nair V, Hinton G (2009) Cifar-10 and cifar-100 datasets. URl: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/kriz/cifar.html6

  12. Li LL, Zhao X, Tseng ML, Tan RR (2020) Short-term wind power forecasting based on support vector machine with improved dragonfly algorithm. J Clean Prod 242:118,447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu S, Bai W, Liu G, Li W, Srivastava HM (2018) Parallel fractal compression method for big video data. Complexity 2018:2016976. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2016976

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu S, Fu W, He L, Zhou J, Ma M (2017) Distribution of primary additional errors in fractal encoding method. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5787–5802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S, Guo C, Al-Turjman F, Muhammad K, de Albuquerque VHC (2020) Reliability of response region: a novel mechanism in visual tracking by edge computing for iiot environments. Mech Syst Signal Process 138:106,537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu S, Liu G, Zhou H (2019) A robust parallel object tracking method for illumination variations. Mobile Netw Appl 24(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu S, Pan Z, Cheng X (2017) A novel fast fractal image compression method based on distance clustering in high dimensional sphere surface. Fractals 25(04):1740,004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lobos RA, Haldar JP (2019) Improving the performance of accelerated image reconstruction in k-space: the importance of kernel shape. In: Proceedings of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine

  19. Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):1053–1073

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Połap D, Marcin W (2017) Polar bear optimization algorithm: meta-heuristic with fast population movement and dynamic birth and death mechanism. Symmetry 9(10):203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qiao Y (2007) The mnist database of handwritten digits. Dapat diakses di: http://www.gavo.tu-tokyo.ac.jp/~qiao/database.html

  22. Qin C, Schlemper J, Caballero J, Price AN, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D (2018) Convolutional recurrent neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(1):280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabar NR, Turky A, Song A, Sattar A (2019) An evolutionary hyper-heuristic to optimise deep belief networks for image reconstruction. Appl Soft Comput p 105510

  24. Sadiq M, Shi D, Guo M, Cheng X (2019) Facial landmark detection via attention-adaptive deep network. IEEE Access 7:181,041–181,050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sainath TN, Kingsbury B, Ramabhadran B (2012) Auto-encoder bottleneck features using deep belief networks. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 4153–4156. IEEE

  26. Schlemper J, Caballero J, Hajnal JV, Price AN, Rueckert D (2017) A deep cascade of convolutional neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37(2):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sha F, Zandavi SM, Chung YY (2019) Fast deep parallel residual network for accurate super resolution image processing. Expert Syst Appl 128:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Szu H, Hartley R (1987) Fast simulated annealing. Phys Lett A 122(3–4):157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Trotter M, Wood T, Hwang J (2019) Forecasting a storm: Divining optimal configurations using genetic algorithms and supervised learning. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on autonomic computing (ICAC), pp 136–146. IEEE

  30. Wang S, Sun J, Mehmood I, Pan C, Chen Y, Zhang YD (2020) Cerebral micro-bleeding identification based on a nine-layer convolutional neural network with stochastic pooling. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 32(1): e5130

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang S, Tang C, Sun J, Zhang Y (2019) Cerebral micro-bleeding detection based on densely connected neural network. Front Neurosci 13:422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang SH, Zhang YD, Yang M, Liu B, Ramirez J, Gorriz JM (2019) Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss identification based on double-density dual-tree complex wavelet transform and multinomial logistic regression. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 26(4):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao H, Rasul K, Vollgraf R (2017) Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms. corr arxiv: abs/1708.07747

  34. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In: 2009 World congress on nature & biologically inspired computing (NaBIC), pp 210–214. IEEE

  35. Yang XS et al (2008) Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Firefly algorithm 20:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zeng X, Leung MR, Zeev-Ben-Mordehai T, Xu M (2018) A convolutional autoencoder approach for mining features in cellular electron cryo-tomograms and weakly supervised coarse segmentation. J Struct Biol 202(2):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Centre for Research and Development of Poland (0080/DIA/2016/45) held by Dawid Polap. This research was partially funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant held by Gautam Srivastava.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawid Połap.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Authors acknowledge the contribution to this project of the “Diamond Grant 2016” No. 0080/DIA/2016/45 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Połap, D., Srivastava, G. Neural image reconstruction using a heuristic validation mechanism. Neural Comput & Applic 33, 10787–10797 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05046-8

Keywords

Navigation