Skip to main content
Log in

A comprehensive investigation into sclera biometrics: a novel dataset and performance study

  • S.I. : Developing nature-inspired intelligence by neural systems
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The area of ocular biometrics is among the most popular branches of biometric recognition technology. This area has long been dominated by iris recognition research, while other ocular modalities such as the periocular region or the vasculature of the sclera have received significantly less attention in the literature. Consequently, ocular modalities beyond the iris are not well studied and their characteristics are today still not as well understood. While recent needs for more secure authentication schemes have considerably increased the interest in competing ocular modalities, progress in these areas is still held back by the lack of publicly available datasets that would allow for more targeted research into specific ocular characteristics next to the iris. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap for the case of sclera biometrics and introduce a novel dataset designed for research into ocular biometrics and most importantly for research into the vasculature of the sclera. Our dataset, called Sclera Blood Vessels, Periocular and Iris (SBVPI), is, to the best of our knowledge, the first publicly available dataset designed specifically with research in sclera biometrics in mind. The dataset contains high-quality RGB ocular images, captured in the visible spectrum, belonging to 55 subjects. Unlike competing datasets, it comes with manual markups of various eye regions, such as the iris, pupil, canthus or eyelashes and a detailed pixel-wise annotation of the complete sclera vasculature for a subset of the images. Additionally, the datasets ship with gender and age labels. The unique characteristics of the dataset allow us to study aspects of sclera biometrics technology that have not been studied before in the literature (e.g. vasculature segmentation techniques) as well as issues that are of key importance for practical recognition systems. Thus, next to the SBVPI dataset we also present in this paper a comprehensive investigation into sclera biometrics and the main covariates that affect the performance of sclera segmentation and recognition techniques, such as gender, age, gaze direction or image resolution. Our experiments not only demonstrate the usefulness of the newly introduced dataset, but also contribute to a better understanding of sclera biometrics in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To ensure reproducibility of our results we make all training code, model definitions, and learned weights publicly available from http://sclera.fri.uni-lj.si/.

References

  1. Alkassar S, Woo WL, Dlay S, Chambers J (2016) Sclera recognition: on the quality measure and segmentation of degraded images captured under relaxed imaging conditions. IET Biometr 6(4):266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alkassar S, Woo WL, Dlay SS, Chambers JA (2017) Robust sclera recognition system with novel sclera segmentation and validation techniques. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst (TSMC) 47(3):474–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L (2006) SURF: speeded up robust features. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, pp 404–417

  4. Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ The ND-IRIS-0405 iris image dataset. Technical report, Notre Dame University

  5. Calonder M, Lepetit V, Strecha C, Fua P (2010) Brief: binary robust independent elementary features. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, pp 778–792

  6. Crihalmeanu S, Ross A (2011) On the use of multispectral conjunctival vasculature as a soft biometric. In: 2011 IEEE workshop on applications of computer vision (WACV), pp 204–211

  7. Das A, Pal U, Ballester MAF, Blumenstein M (2014) A new efficient and adaptive sclera recognition system. In: 2014 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence in biometrics and identity management (CIBIM). IEEE, pp 1–8

  8. Das A, Pal U, Ferrer Ballester MA, Blumenstein M (2013) Sclera recognition using dense-sift. In: 2013 13th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications (ISDA). IEEE, pp 74–79

  9. Das A, Pal U, Ferrer Ballester MA, Blumenstein M (2014) Fuzzy logic based selera recognition. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 561–568

  10. Das A, Pal U, Ferrer MA, Blumenstein M, Štepec D, Rot P, Emeršič Ž, Peer P, Štruc V, Kumar SA et al (2017) SSERBC 2017: sclera segmentation and eye recognition benchmarking competition. In: international joint conference on biometrics (IJCB), pp 742–747

  11. Das A, Pal U, Ferrer MA, Blumenstein M, Štepec D, Rot P, Peer P, Štruc V (2018) SSBC 2018: sclera segmentation benchmarking competition. In: International conference on biometrics (ICB), pp 303–308

  12. Daugman J (1993) High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1148–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Marsico M, Nappi M, Riccio D, Wechsler H (2015) Mobile iris challenge evaluation (MICHE)-I, biometric iris dataset and protocols. Pattern Recognit Lett 57:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Derakhshani R, Ross A (2007) A texture-based neural network classifier for biometric identification using ocular surface vasculature. In: International joint conference on neural networks 2007 (IJCNN 2007). IEEE, pp 2982–2987

  15. Derakhshani R, Ross A, Crihalmeanu S (2006) A new biometric modality based on conjunctival vasculature. In: Artificial neural networks in engineering (ANNIE), pp 1–8

  16. Dobeš M, Machala L, Tichavskỳ P, Pospíšil J (2004) Human eye iris recognition using the mutual information. Optik 115(9):399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gangwar A, Joshi A (2016) DeepIrisNet: deep iris representation with applications in iris recognition and cross-sensor iris recognition. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pp 2301–2305

  18. Gottemukkula V, Saripalle S, Tankasala SP, Derakhshani R (2016) Method for using visible ocular vasculature for mobile biometrics. IET Biometr 5(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gottemukkula V, Saripalle SK, Tankasala SP, Derakhshani R, Pasula R, Ross A (2012) Fusing iris and conjunctival vasculature: ocular biometrics in the visible spectrum. In: 2012 IEEE conference on technologies for homeland security (HST), pp 150–155

  20. Hosseini MS, Araabi BN, Soltanian-Zadeh H (2010) Pigment melanin: pattern for iris recognition. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas (TIM) 59(4):792–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hosseini MS, Araabi BN, Soltanian-Zadeh H (2010) Pigment melanin: pattern for iris recognition. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 59(4):792–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar A, Passi A (2010) Comparison and combination of iris matchers for reliable personal authentication. Pattern Recognit 43(3):1016–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin G, Milan A, Shen C, Reid I (2017) RefineNet: multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)

  24. Lin Y, Du EY, Zhou Z, Thomas NL (2014) An efficient parallel approach for sclera vein recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 9(2):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu N, Zhang M, Li H, Sun Z, Tan T (2016) DeepIris: learning pairwise filter bank for heterogeneous iris verification. Pattern Recognit Lett 82:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu X, Bowyer KW, Flynn PJ (2005) Experiments with an improved iris segmentation algorithm. Fourth IEEE workshop on automatic identification advanced technologies (AIAT) (AutoID’05), pp 118–123

  27. Lowe DG (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Int J Comput Vis 2:1150–1157

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lucio DR, Laroca R, Severo E, Britto Jr AS, Menotti D (2018) Fully convolutional networks and generative adversarial networks applied to sclera segmentation. In: IEEE international conference on biometrics: theory, applications, and systems

  29. Ma L, Tan T, Wang Y, Zhang D (2004) Efficient iris recognition by characterizing key local variations. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(6):739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahlouji M, Noruzi A (2012) Human iris segmentation for iris recognition in unconstrained environments. Int J Comput Sci Issues 9:01

    Google Scholar 

  31. Menotti D, Chiachia G, Pinto A, Schwartz WR, Pedrini H, Falcão AX, Rocha A (2015) Deep representations for iris, face, and fingerprint spoofing detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Security (TIFS) 10(4):864–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miyazawa K, Ito K, Aoki T, Kobayashi K, Nakajima H (2008) An effective approach for iris recognition using phase-based image matching. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(10):1741–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Monro DM, Rakshit S, Zhang D (2007) DCT-based iris recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(4):586–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nguyen K, Fookes C, Ross A, Sridharan S (2018) Iris recognition with off-the-shelf CNN features: a deep learning perspective. IEEE Access 6:18848–18855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nigam I, Vatsa M, Singh R (2015) Ocular biometrics: a survey of modalities and fusion approaches. Inf Fusion 26:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oh K, Toh KA (2012) Extracting sclera features for cancelable identity verification. In: 2012 5th IAPR international conference on biometrics (ICB). IEEE, pp 245–250

  37. Padole CN, Proença H (2013) Compensating for pose and illumination in unconstrained periocular biometrics. Int J Biometr 5(3–4):336–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Padole CN, Proença H (2012) Periocular recognition: analysis of performance degradation factors. In: 2012 5th IAPR international conference on biometrics (ICB). IEEE, pp 439–445

  39. Park U, Jillela RR, Ross A, Jain AK (2011) Periocular biometrics in the visible spectrum. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 6(1):96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Patil V, Patil AM (2017) Human identification method: sclera recognition. Int J Comput Sci Netw 6(1):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  41. Phillips PJ, Boyer KW, Flynn PJ, O’Toole AJ, Phillips PJ, Schott CL, Scruggs WT, Sharpe M (2007) FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results

  42. Proença H, Alexandre L (2005) UBIRIS: a noisy iris image database. In: international conference on image analysis and processing (ICIAP). Springer, pp 970–977

  43. Proença H, Filipe S, Santos R, Oliveira J, Alexandre LA (2010) The UBIRIS.v2: a database of visible wavelength iris images captured on-the-move and at-a-distance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(8):1529–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Radu P, Ferryman J, Wild P (2015) A robust sclera segmentation algorithm. In: International conference on biometrics: theory, applications, and systems (BTAS), pp 1–6

  45. Riccio D, Brancati N, Frucci M, Gragnaniello D (2017) An unsupervised approach for eye sclera segmentation. In: Iberoamerican congress on pattern recognition (CIARP). Springer, pp 550–557

  46. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI): 18th international conference, proceedings, part III. Springer, Cham, pp 234–241

  47. Rosten E, Drummond T (2006) Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, pp 430–443

  48. Rot P, Vitek M, Grm K, Emeršič Ž, Peer P, Štruc V (2020) Deep sclera segmentation and recognition. In: Uhl A, Busch C, Marcel S, Veldhuis R (eds) Handbook of vascular biometrics. Springer, Berlin, pp 395–432

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Rot P, Štruc V, Peer P (2018) Deep multi-class eye segmentation for ocular biometrics. In: IEEE international work conference on bioinspired intelligence (IWOBI)

  50. Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, Bradski G (2011) ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF

  51. Shah S, Ross A (2009) Iris segmentation using geodesic active contours. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 4(4):824–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharma A, Verma S, Vatsa M, Singh R (2014) On cross spectral periocular recognition. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE, pp 5007–5011

  53. Sun Z, Tan T (2009) Ordinal measures for iris recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(12):2211–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun Z, Zhang H, Tan T, Wang J (2014) Iris image classification based on hierarchical visual codebook. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 36(6):1120–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tankasala SP, Doynov P, Derakhshani RR, Ross A, Crihalmeanu S (2011) Biometric recognition of conjunctival vasculature using GLCM features. In: 2011 international conference on image information processing (ICIIP), pp 1–6

  56. Thomas NL, Du Y, Zhou Z (2010) A new approach for sclera vein recognition. In: Mobile multimedia/image processing, security, and applications 2010, vol 7708. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 770805

  57. Whitelam C, Jafri Z, Bourlai T (2010) Multispectral eye detection: a preliminary study. In: 2010 20th international conference on pattern recognition. IEEE, pp 209–212

  58. Yuan X, Shi P (2004) An iris segmentation procedure for iris recognition. In: Advances in biometric person authentication. Springer, pp 546–553

  59. Zhou Z, Du EY, Thomas NL, Delp EJ (2011) Multi-angle sclera recognition system. In: 2011 IEEE workshop on computational intelligence in biometrics and identity management (CIBIM). IEEE, pp 103–108

  60. Zhou Z, Du EY, Thomas NL, Delp EJ (2012) A new human identification method: sclera recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 42(3):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou Z, Du EY, Thomas NL, Delp EJ (2013) A comprehensive multimodal eye recognition. SIViP 7(4):619–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou Z, Du Y, Thomas N, Delp EJ III (2010) Multimodal eye recognition. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 7708:04

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in parts by the ARRS (Slovenian Research Agency) Research Programme P2-0250 (B) Metrology and Biometric Systems and the ARRS Research Programme P2-0214 (A) Computer Vision. The authors would also like to thank the Nvidia corporation for donating the Titan V GPU, which allowed us to evaluate CNN-based approaches more efficiently.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej Vitek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitek, M., Rot, P., Štruc, V. et al. A comprehensive investigation into sclera biometrics: a novel dataset and performance study. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 17941–17955 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04782-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04782-1

Keywords

Navigation