Skip to main content
Log in

A new graph learning-based signal processing approach for non-intrusive load disaggregation with active power measurements

  • ATCI 2019
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, there is a potential technology called graph-based signal processing (GSP) that is being used in many applications. GSP has been used successfully in the domains such as signal and image filtering and processing. In the paper, GSP is used as an applicable method to non-intrusive appliance load monitoring (NILM). In NILM, all of power consumption is disaggregated down to every appliance’s consumption without hardware. Although there is over 30 years after NILM was proposed, there are still some problems faced by applications of NILM in real scenario if there is no training data. By combination of NILM with GSP concept, such a challenge is tackled with better performance over existing methods. As the first step, we propose a new graph learning algorithm to get a graph suitable for appliance load representation and for the disaggregation algorithm. In the following steps, graph-based signal processing method is used three times, from representation of the data sets of power measurements. Public datasets are used to demonstrate the proposed method’s performance and feasibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeifman M, Roth K (2011) Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring: review and outlook. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 57(1):76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. of Energy, C. C. UK (2013) Government response to the consultation on the second version of the smart metering equipment technical specifications: part 2

  3. Armel KC, Gupta A, Shrimali A, Albert G (2013) Is disaggregation the holy grail of energy efficiency? The case of electricity. Energy Policy 52:213–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao B, Stankovic L, Stankovic V (2016) On a training-less solution for non intrusive appliance load monitoring using graph signal processing. IEEE Access 4:1784–1799. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2557460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He K, Stankovic L, Liao J, Stankovic V (2017) Non-intrusive load disaggregation using graph signal processing. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2016.2598872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giri S, Berges M (2015) An energy estimation framework for event-based methods in non-intrusive load monitoring. Energy Convers Manag 90:488–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Srinivasan D, Ng WS, Liew AC (2006) Neural-network-based signature recognition for harmonic source identification. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 21(1):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2005.852370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong W, Dong ZY, Hill DJ, Luo F, Xu Y (2016) Improving nonintrusive load monitoring efficiency via a hybrid programing method. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 12(6):2148–2157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2016.2590359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makonin S, Popowich F, Bajic IV, Gill B, Bartram L (2016) Exploiting hmm sparsity to perform online real-time nonintrusive load monitoring. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(6):2575–2585. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2494592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egarter D, Bhuvana VP, Elmenreich W (2015) Paldi: Online load disaggregation via particle filtering. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64(2):467–477. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014.2344373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shuman DI, Narang SK, Frossard P, Ortega A, Vandergheynst P (2013) The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. IEEE Signal Process Mag 30(3):83–98. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2235192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Romero D, Ma M, Giannakis GB (2017) Kernel-based reconstruction of graph signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process 65(3):764–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.2620116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mei J, Moura JMF (2016) Signal processing on graphs: causal modeling of unstructured data. IEEE Trans Signal Process. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2016.2634543

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Perraudin N, Paratte J, Shuman D, Martin L, Kalofolias V, Vandergheynst P, Hammond DK (2014) GSPBOX: a toolbox for signal processing on graphs. arXiv eprints arXiv:1408.5781

  15. Irion J, Saito N (2016) Efficient approximation and denoising of graph signals using the multiscale basis dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process Over Netw. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsipn.2016.2632039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorenzo PD, Barbarossa S, Banelli P, Sardellitti S (2016) Adaptive least mean squares estimation of graph signals. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process Over Netw 2(4):555–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2613687

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarand HG, Karimi B (2019) Adaptive consensus tracking of non-square MIMO nonlinear systems with input saturation and input gain matrix under directed graph. Neural Comput Appl 31(7):2171–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Behjat H, Richter U, Ville DVD, Sornmo L (2016) Signal-adapted tight frames on graphs. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64(22):6017–6029. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.2591513.25

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang W, Goldsberry L, Wymbs NF, Grafton ST, Bassett DS, Ribeiro A (2016) Graph frequency analysis of brain signals. IEEE J Sel Topics Signal Process 10(7):1189–1203. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2600859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng X, Tang YY, Pan J, Zhou J (2016) Adaptive multiscale decomposition of graph signals. IEEE Signal Process Lett 23(10):1389–1393. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2016.2598750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Segarra S, Marques AG, Leus G, Ribeiro A (2016) Reconstruction of graph signals through percolation from seeding nodes. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64(16):4363–4378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tremblay N, Borgnat P (2016) Subgraph-based filterbanks for graph signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process 64(15):3827–3840. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.2544747

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang D, Liang J (2017) Graph-based transform for 2-d piecewise smooth signals with random discontinuity locations. IEEE Trans Image Process. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2017.2661399

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Fracastoro G, Magli E (2017) Steerable discrete fourier transform. IEEE Signal Process Lett. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2017.2657889

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandryhaila A, Moura JMF (2014) Discrete signal processing on graphs: frequency analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(12):3042–3054. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2014.2321121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu X, He L, Lu H, Shimada A, Taniguchi RI (2016) Non-linear matrix completion for social image tagging. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2624267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bera D, Chakrabarti I, Pathak S, Karagiannidis G (2016) Another look in the analysis of cooperative spectrum sensing over nakagami-m fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2016.2633259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Komodakis N, Pesquet JC (2015) Playing with duality: an overview of recent primal dual approaches for solving large-scale optimization problems. IEEE Signal Process Mag 32(6):31–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stankovic V, Liao J, Stankovic L (2014) A graph-based signal processing approach for low-rate energy disaggregation. In: 2014 IEEE symposium on computational intelligence for engineering solutions (CIES), pp 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/cies.2014.7011835

  30. Sandryhaila A, Moura JMF (2013) Classification via regularization on graphs. In: 2013 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing, pp 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1109/globalsip.2013.6736923

  31. Zhao B, Stankovic L, Stankovic V (2015) Blind non-intrusive appliance load monitoring using graph-based signal processing. In: 2015 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing (GlobalSIP), pp 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/globalsip.2015.7418158

  32. Welikala S, Dinesh C, Godaliyadda V, Ekanayake MPB, Ekanayake J (2016) Robust non-intrusive load monitoring (nilm) with unknown loads. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on information and automation for sustainability (ICIAfS), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciafs

  33. Makonin S, Popowich F, Bartram L, Gill B, Bajic IV (2013) Ampds: a public dataset for load disaggregation and eco-feedback research. In: 2013 IEEE electrical power energy conference, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/epec.2013.6802949

  34. Kolter J, Jaakkola T (2012) Approximate interence in additive factorial hmms with application to energy disaggregation. J Mach Learn Res 22(1):1472–1482

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Yue Zhai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, MY. A new graph learning-based signal processing approach for non-intrusive load disaggregation with active power measurements. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 5495–5504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04623-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04623-w

Keywords

Navigation