Neural network applications in fault diagnosis and detection: an overview of implementations in engineering-related systems

Abstract

The use of artificial neural networks (ANN) in fault detection analysis is widespread. This paper aims to provide an overview on its application in the field of fault identification and diagnosis (FID), as well as the guiding elements behind their successful implementations in engineering-related applications. In most of the reviewed studies, the ANN architecture of choice for FID problem-solving is the multilayer perceptron (MLP). This is likely due to its simplicity, flexibility, and established usage. Its use managed to find footing in a variety of fields in engineering very early on, even before the technology was as polished as it is today. Recurrent neural networks, while having overall stronger potential for solving dynamic problems, are only suggested for use after a simpler implementation in MLP was attempted. Across various ANN applications in FID, it is observed that preprocessing of the inputs is extremely important in obtaining the proper features for use in training the network, particularly when signal analysis is involved. Normalization is practically a standard for ANN use, and likely many other decision-based learning methods due to its ease of use and high impact on speed of convergence. A simple demonstration of ANN’s ease of use in solving a unique FID problem was also shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. 1.

    Pandya DH, Upadhyay SH, Harsha SP (2012) ANN based fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing using time-frequency domain feature. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4(6):2878–2886

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhou J et al (2014) Fault detection and identification spanning multiple processes by integrating PCA with neural network. Appl Soft Comput 14:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gastaldello D et al (2012) Fault location in underground systems using artificial neural networks and PSCAD/EMTDC. In: IEEE 16th international conference on intelligent engineering systems (INES) 2012. IEEE, Lisbon, pp 423–427

  4. 4.

    Samanta B, Al-Balushi KR, Al-Araimi SA (2004) Bearing fault detection using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2004(3):785672

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar A (2003) Neural network based detection of local textile defects. Pattern Recognit 36(7):1645–1659

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mekki H, Mellit A, Salhi H (2016) Artificial neural network-based modelling and fault detection of partial shaded photovoltaic modules. Simul Model Pract Theory 67(Supplement C):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hwang BC, Saif M, Jamshidi M (1993) Neural based fault detection and identification for a nuclear reactor. IFAC Proc Vol 26(2, Part 5):547–550

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Patton RJ, Frank PM, Clark RN (2013) Issues of fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rajakarunakaran S et al (2008) Artificial neural network approach for fault detection in rotary system. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):740–748

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Taqvi S et al (2017) Artificial neural network for anomalies detection in distillation column. In: Modeling, design and simulation of systems: 17th Asia simulation conference, AsiaSim 2017, Melaka, Malaysia. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    López-Mata E et al (2016) Development of a direct-solution algorithm for determining the optimal crop planning of farms using deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manag 171:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Choudhury S, Jain M, Shah S (2008) Stiction-definition, modelling, detection and quantification. J Process Control 18(3–4):232–243

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chen J, Patton RJ (1999) Robust model-based fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Kluwer, New York, p 354

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schmitz GPJ, Aldrich C, Gouws FS (1999) ANN-DT: an algorithm for extraction of decision trees from artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(6):1392–1401

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Muhammad T, Halim Z (2016) Employing artificial neural networks for constructing metadata-based model to automatically select an appropriate data visualization technique. Appl Soft Comput 49(Supplement C):365–384

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang G, Eddy Patuwo B, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks: the state of the art. Int J Forecast 14(1):35–62

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dougherty M (1995) A review of neural networks applied to transport. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 3(4):247–260

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jayas DS, Paliwal J, Visen NS (2000) Review paper (AE—automation and emerging technologies): multi-layer neural networks for image analysis of agricultural products. J Agric Eng Res 77(2):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Catelani M, Gori M (1996) On the application of neural networks to fault diagnosis of electronic analog circuit. Measurement 17(2):73–80

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Aminian M, Aminian F (2000) Neural-network based analog-circuit fault diagnosis using wavelet transform as preprocessor. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Analog Digit Signal Process 47(2):151

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Spina R, Upadhyaya S (1997) Linear circuit fault diagnosis using neuromorphic analyzers. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Analog Digit Signal Process 44(3):188–196

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dreiseitl S, Ohno-Machado L (2002) Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform 35(5):352–359

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Patan K (2008) Artificial neural networks for the modelling and fault diagnosis of technical processes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hussain M (1999) Review of the applications of neural networks in chemical process control—simulation and online implementation. Artif Intell Eng 13(1):55–68

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bhat NV et al (1990) Modeling chemical process systems via neural computation. IEEE Control Syst Mag 10(3):24–30

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miller WT, Werbos PJ, Sutton RS (1995) Neural networks for control. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Antsaklis PJ (1990) Neural networks for control systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1(2):242–244

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Koivo HN (1994) Artificial neural networks in fault diagnosis and control. Control Eng Pract 2(1):89–101

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Narendra KS, Parthasarathy K (1990) Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1(1):4–27

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nelles O (2013) Nonlinear system identification: from classical approaches to neural networks and fuzzy models. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rutkowski L, Rutkowski L (2004) New soft computing techniques for system modeling, pattern classification and image processing. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang J, Man K (1998) Time series prediction using RNN in multi-dimension embedding phase space. In: 1998 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. IEEE

  33. 33.

    Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Janczak A (2004) Identification of nonlinear systems using neural networks and polynomial models: a block-oriented approach, vol 310. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Patan K, Parisini T (2005) Identification of neural dynamic models for fault detection and isolation: the case of a real sugar evaporation process. J Process Control 15(1):67–79

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Frank PM, Köppen-Seliger B (1997) New developments using AI in fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 10(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Calado J et al (2001) Soft computing approaches to fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. Eur J Control 7(2–3):248–286

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Korbicz J et al (2012) Fault diagnosis: models, artificial intelligence, applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang J, Roberts PD (1992) On-line process fault diagnosis using neural network techniques. Trans Inst Meas Control 14(4):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Svozil D, Kvasnicka V, Pospichal J (1997) Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 39(1):43–62

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Universal approximation using feedforward networks with non-sigmoid hidden layer activation functions. In: International 1989 joint conference on neural networks, Washington DC, USA, vol 1, pp 613–617

  42. 42.

    Nawi NM, Atomi WH, Rehman MZ (2013) The effect of data pre-processing on optimized training of artificial neural networks. Procedia Technol 11(Supplement C):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Al-Naser M, Elshafei M, Al-sarkhi A (2016) Artificial neural network application for multiphase flow patterns detection: a new approach. J Petrol Sci Eng 145:548–564

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gertler J (1998) Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Isermann R, Ballé P (1997) Trends in the application of model-based fault detection and diagnosis of technical processes. Control Eng Pract 5(5):709–719

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):313–326

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Venkatasubramanian V et al (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: part III: process history based methods. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):327–346

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Venkatasubramanian V (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: part I: quantitative model-based methods. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):293–311

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Methods 43(1):3–31

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Śmieja FJ (1993) Neural network constructive algorithms: trading generalization for learning efficiency? Circuits Syst Signal Process 12(2):331–374

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Westreich D, Lessler J, Funk MJ (2010) Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J Clin Epidemiol 63(8):826–833

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Santín D, Delgado FJ, Valiño A (2004) The measurement of technical efficiency: a neural network approach. Appl Econ 36(6):627–635

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gurney K (1997) An introduction to neural networks. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Demuth HB, Beale MH (2000) Neural network toolbox; for use with MATLAB; computation, visualization, programming; user's guide, version 4. Math Works

  55. 55.

    Reed RD, Marks RJ (1998) Neural smithing: supervised learning in feedforward artificial neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 346

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Setiono R (1997) Extracting rules from neural networks by pruning and hidden-unit splitting. Neural Comput 9(1):205–225

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Garson G (1991) Interpreting neural-network connections. AI Expert 6:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Haykin SS, Haykin SS (2009) Neural networks and learning machines, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P (1994) Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. Trans Neural Netw 5(2):157–166

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hagan M, Demuth H, Beale M, Jesús O (2014) Neural network design. University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chen L (2009) Curse of dimensionality. In: Liu L, ÖZsu MT (eds) Encyclopedia of database systems. Springer, Boston, pp 545–546

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Smith LI (2002) A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis. Computer Science Technical Report No. OUCS-2002-12. http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7534. Accessed 2 Feb 2018

  63. 63.

    Merry RJE (2005) Wavelet theory and applications: a literature study, p 41. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/4376957/612762.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017

  64. 64.

    Dolley Shukla JS (2013) Wavelets: basic concepts. Int J Electr Electron Eng Telecommun 4:33

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(7):674–693

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Sharma R et al (2004) Neural network applications for detecting process faults in packed towers. Chem Eng Process 43(7):841–847

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Paya BA, Esat II, Badi MNM (1997) Artificial neural network based fault diagnostics of rotating machinery using wavelet transforms as a preprocessor. Mech Syst Signal Process 11(5):751–765

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Banjanovic-Mehmedovic L et al (2017) Neural network based data-driven modelling of anomaly detection in thermal power plant. Automatika 58:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Misra M et al (2002) Multivariate process monitoring and fault diagnosis by multi-scale PCA. Comput Chem Eng 26(9):1281–1293

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Feng Z, Xu T (2011) Comparison of SOM and PCA-SOM in fault diagnosis of ground-testing bed. Procedia Eng 15(Supplement C):1271–1276

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ziani R et al (2012) Bearing fault diagnosis using neural network and genetic algorithms with the trace criterion. In: Fakhfakh T et al (eds) Condition monitoring of machinery in non-stationary operations: proceedings of the second international conference “condition monitoring of machinery in non-stationary operations” CMMNO’2012. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Behbahani RM, Jazayeri-Rad H, Hajmirzaee S (2009) Fault detection and diagnosis in a sour gas absorption column using neural networks. Chem Eng Technol 32(5):840–845

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Manssouri I, Chetouani Y, Kihel BE (2008) Using neural networks for fault detection in a distillation column. Int J Comput Appl Technol 32(3):181–186

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Jamil M, Sharma SK, Singh R (2015) Fault detection and classification in electrical power transmission system using artificial neural network. SpringerPlus 4(1):334

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Abbasi Nozari H et al (2012) Model-based robust fault detection and isolation of an industrial gas turbine prototype using soft computing techniques. Neurocomputing 91:29–47

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Taqvi SA, Tufa LD, Zabiri H et al (2018) Fault detection in distillation column using NARX neural network. Neural Comput Applic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3658-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Kiakojoori S, Khorasani K (2016) Dynamic neural networks for gas turbine engine degradation prediction, health monitoring and prognosis. Neural Comput Appl 27(8):2157–2192

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Tidriri K et al (2016) Bridging data-driven and model-based approaches for process fault diagnosis and health monitoring: a review of researches and future challenges. Annu Rev Control 42:63–81

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    LeCun Y et al (1998) Efficient BackProp. In: Orr GB, Müller K-R (eds) Neural networks: tricks of the trade. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–50

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Starr KD, Petersen H, Bauer M (2016) Control loop performance monitoring—ABB’s experience over two decades. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(7):526–532

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kline DM, Berardi VL (2005) Revisiting squared-error and cross-entropy functions for training neural network classifiers. Neural Comput Appl 14(4):310–318

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Shoukat Choudhury MAA, Thornhill NF, Shah SL (2005) Modelling valve stiction. Control Eng Pract 13(5):641–658

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Choudhury MAAS, Kariwala V, Shah SL, Douke H, Takada H, Thornhill NF (2005) A simple test to confirm control valve stiction. IFAC Proc 38(1):81–86. https://doi.org/10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Jelali M, Huang B (2010) Detection and diagnosis of stiction in control loops: state of the art and advanced methods. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Farenzena M, Trierweiler JO (2009) A novel technique to estimate valve stiction based on pattern recognition. In: de Brito Alves RM, do Nascimento CAO, Biscaia EC (eds) Computer aided chemical engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1191–1196

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Venceslau AR, Guedes LA, Silva DR (2012) Artificial neural network approach for detection and diagnosis of valve stiction. In: 2012 IEEE 17th conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). IEEE

  87. 87.

    Bacci di Capaci R, Scali C (2018) Review and comparison of techniques of analysis of valve stiction: from modeling to smart diagnosis. Chem Eng Res Des 130:230–265

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank MOSTI Grant Science Fund 0153AB-B67 for the funding provided for this work. The authors would also like to thank Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) for the support provided for this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haslinda Zabiri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohd Amiruddin, A.A.A., Zabiri, H., Taqvi, S.A.A. et al. Neural network applications in fault diagnosis and detection: an overview of implementations in engineering-related systems. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 447–472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3911-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Artificial neural network
  • Fault detection
  • Fault diagnosis
  • Engineering application
  • Data preprocessing