Skip to main content
Log in

Research on prediction model of geotechnical parameters based on BP neural network

  • Machine Learning - Applications & Techniques in Cyber Intelligence
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the vigorous development of the national economy, the pace and scale of urban construction have been unfolded at an unprecedented speed. A large number of construction projects have made the urban engineering geological exploration activities reach a considerable scale in depth and breadth. The survey results of these projects are very valuable information resources, which not only played an important role in urban planning and construction at that time, but also had high reuse value. Based on BP neural network theory, this paper uses engineering geological database as the research and development platform. Based on the theory of BP neural network and the engineering geological database as the research and development platform, this paper establishes the prediction of geotechnical parameters based on the analysis of the characteristics of geotechnical materials and the distribution of geotechnical sediments and geotechnical parameters. Based on the survey data and specific engineering information, the prediction model of the project was established, and the distribution of the stratum and the relevant geotechnical parameters were predicted. Based on the study of geotechnical properties and BP neural network, a new parameter prediction model is established. Taking the engineering geological database as the platform, using the programming language such as MATLAB, the preliminary research and construction of this prediction system were carried out. The results show that the generalization ability of the prediction model meets the requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xing-Liang HE (2015) Application of various technical methods in geotechnical engineering investigation. Constr Des Eng (S1):59–62

  2. Liu M (2015) Analysis on common problems in foundation design and rock and soil engineering investigation process. Shanxi Archit 41(14):58–60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang XM, Yong LI, Gang LI (2013) Comparison of the grading of geotechnical investigation and the classification of rock and soil between Europe and China. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 30(10):72–76

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Z, Peiliang HU, Neng YU et al (2013) Rockmass quality evaluation and rock-soil mechanical parameters research of open-pit slope in Dachang Gold Mine. Nonferrous Met 65(5):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai F (2017) The existing problems and countermeasures of building engineering in rock and soil investigation. Shanxi Archit 43(19):87–88

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang S, Zeng S, Pan J et al (2018) Slope reliability analysis based on analytical simulation of conditional random fields of rock and soil parameters. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 37(3):642–651

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Summerfield C et al (2017) Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron 95(2):245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imran M, Castillo C, Ji L, et al (2014) AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response. In: International conference on World Wide Web. ACM, pp 159–162

  9. Russell S, Dewey D, Tegmark M (2015) Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. Ai Magazine 36(4):105–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ni SH, Bai YH (2000) Application of BP neural network model in groundwater quality evaluation. Syst Eng-Theory Pract 20(8):124–127

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hosseini MP, Pompili D, Elisevich K et al (2017) Optimized deep learning for EEG big data and seizure prediction BCI via internet of things. IEEE Trans Big Data 3(4):392–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kisi O, Shiri J, Nikoofar B (2012) Forecasting daily lake levels using artificial intelligence approaches. Comput Geosci 41(2):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee WI, Shih BY, Chen CY (2012) A hybrid artificial intelligence sales-forecasting system in the convenience store industry. Human Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 22(3):188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huo L, Jiang B, Ning T et al (2014) A BP Neural Network Predictor Model for Stock. Springer, Cham, pp 362–368

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Gao X, Katayama S (2015) Weld appearance prediction with BP neural network improved by genetic algorithm during disk laser welding. J Manuf Syst 34:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song LI, Xie Y (2012) Application of AdaBoost_BP neural network in prediction of railway freight volumes. Comput Eng Appl 48(6):233–248

    Google Scholar 

  17. Puri N, Prasad HD, Jain A (2018) Prediction of geotechnical parameters using machine learning techniques. Procedia Comput Sci 125:509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Arulkumaran S, Sukumar S (2015) Geotechnical parameters prediction models for infrastructure developments. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(7):17251–17260

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khakestar MS, Hassani H, Moarefvand P et al (2016) Prediction of the collapsing risk of mining slopes based on geostatistical interpretation of geotechnical parameters. J Geol Soc India 87(1):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohanty R, Suman S, Das SK (2018) Prediction of vertical pile capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil using artificial intelligence techniques. Int J Geotech Eng 12(2):209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bing-Bing WU (2016) Study on determination method of geotechnical engineering parameters. World Nonferrous Met (19):45–46

  22. Tizpa P, Chenari RJ, Fard MK et al (2014) ANN prediction of some geotechnical properties of soil from their index parameters. Arab J Geosci 8(5):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Amin BM, Kettab RM, Zedira H et al (2017) Comparing nonlinear regression analysis and artificial neural networks to predict geotechnical parameters from standard penetration test. Urban Archit Constr 9(3):14

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bayat H, Ersahin S, Hepper EN (2013) Improving estimation of specific surface area by artificial neural network ensembles using fractal and particle size distribution curve parameters as predictors. Environ Model Assess 18(5):605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bahmed IT, Harichane K, Ghrici M, et al (2017) Prediction of geotechnical properties of clayey soils stabilised with lime using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Int J Geotech Eng (8):1–13

  26. Elarabi H (2014) Developing of prediction models for soil profile and its parameters using artificial neural networks. Publ Group 2(2):43

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zuo H, Luo Z, Guan J et al (2014) Identification on rock and soil parameters for vibration drilling rock in metal mine based on fuzzy least square support vector. J Central South Univ 21(3):1085–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41572245) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2682018GJPY02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, K., Jing, X. Research on prediction model of geotechnical parameters based on BP neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 31, 8205–8215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3902-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3902-6

Keywords

Navigation