Advertisement

Raising opportunities in strategic alliance by evaluating efficiency of logistics companies in Vietnam: a case of Cat Lai Port

  • Nhu-Ty Nguyen
  • Thanh-Tuyen Tran
Original Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

The current context of Vietnam is that Vietnam is a developing country whose geographical shape is long and dynamic. Its logistics is also in the way of development and promising to have good potential. However, lack experience and technology, small and fragmented operation, fierce price competition among local enterprises, domination from foreign logistics giants are that factors that may hinder the growth of the local sector. It is then believed that cooperation among local firms could promote integration of the supply chain, making it more productive and so increase competitiveness of the industry. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of Vietnamese transportation and logistics firms using Malmquist Productivity Index, crafting a clearer picture of how these firms performed in terms of technical efficiency and innovation. Cat Lai Port being a key role in the industry was taken as a case to analyse strategic alliance opportunities using data envelopment analysis and Grey forecasting. Research findings indicate that half of the samples experienced efficiency progress, half experienced performance regress; most of efficiency improvement came from innovation. The study also found that strategic alliances between Cat Lai Port and some firms potentially improve these firms’ efficiency.

Keywords

Efficiency Strategic alliance Logistics Malmquist DEA GM(1,1) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Nguyen Hai Ngoc, an undergraduate student from the bachelor program in Business Administration, School of Business, International University – Vietnam National University, HCMC for her editorial assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Arena P, Fazzino S, Fortuna L, Maniscalco P (2003) Game theory and non-linear dynamics: the Parrondo paradox case study. Chaos Solitons Fractals 17(2–3):545–555CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowersox DJ (1989) Leading edge logistics—competitive positioning for the 1990s. Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, Illinois. https://hbr.org/1990/07/the-strategic-benefits-of-logistics-alliances. Accessed June 2017
  3. 3.
    Camelia D (2015) Grey systems theory in economics–bibliometric analysis and applications’ overview. Grey Syst Theory Appl 5(2):244–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econ J Econ Soc 50(6):1393–1414zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):339CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chia-Nan W, Ty NN (2013) Forecasting the manpower requirement in Vietnamese tertiary institutions. Asian J Empir Res 3(5):563–575Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook WD, Seiford LM (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—thirty years on. Eur J Oper Res 192(1):1–17MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delcea C, Popa CDS, Bolos M (2015) Consumers’ decisions in grey online social networks. J Grey Syst 27(4):12–28Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(1):66–83Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 120(3):253–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flexport (2016) What the new ocean carrier alliances mean to your freight. https://www.flexport.com/blog/what-are-ocean-alliances/. Accessed Apr 2017
  12. 12.
    Fraunhofer (2016) Port cooperation between European seaports—fundamentals, challenges and good practices. http://www.guengl.eu/uploads/publications-documents/CMLReportPortCooperationvFINAL.PDF. Accessed Apr 2017
  13. 13.
    Golany B, Roll Y (1989) An application procedure for DEA. Omega 17(3):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gong Z, Forrest JYL (2014) Special issue on meteorological disaster risk analysis and assessment: on basis of grey systems theory. Nat Hazards 71(2):995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu CI, Wen YH (2000) Application of grey theory and multiobjective programming towards airline network design. Eur J Oper Res 127(1):44–68CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Julong D (1982) Grey control system. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol 3:9–18zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Julong D (1989) Introduction to grey system theory. J Grey Syst 1(1):1–24MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee CY, Johnson AL (2012) Operational efficiency. The handbook of industrial and systems engineering. http://polab.imis.ncku.edu.tw/Book%20Chapter/Operational%20Efficiency.pdf. Accessed May 2017
  19. 19.
    Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de estadística 4(2):209–242MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mao M, Chirwa EC (2006) Application of grey model GM(1,1) to vehicle fatality risk estimation. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(5):588–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen N-T, Tran T-T (2015) Mathematical development and evaluation of forecasting models for accuracy of inflation in developing countries: a case of Vietnam. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2015:858157.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/858157 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nguyen NT, Tran TT (2016) Facilitating an advanced product layout to prioritize hot lots in 450 mm wafer foundry in the semiconductor industry. Int J Adv Appl Sci 3(6):14–23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nguyen NT, Tran TT (2017) Optimizing mathematical parameters of Grey system theory: an empirical forecasting case of Vietnamese tourism. Neural Comput Appl 28:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3058-9 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen NT, Tran TT (2017) A novel integration of DEA, GM (1,1) and neural network in strategic alliance for the Indian electricity organizations. J Grey Syst 29(2):80–101MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen NT, Tran TT, Wang CN, Nguyen NT (2015) Optimization of strategic alliances by integrating DEA and grey model. J Grey Syst 27(1):38–56Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oxford Business Group (2016) Vietnam loading up on logistics. http://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/news/vietnam-loading-logistics. Accessed Apr 2017
  27. 27.
    Pai TY, Hanaki K, Ho HH, Hsieh CM (2007) Using grey system theory to evaluate transportation effects on air quality trends in Japan. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 12(3):158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stoxplus (2016) Vietnam logistics market 2016 report. https://biinform.com/Reports/DBB-vietnam-logistic-market-2016-report-.html. Accessed Apr 2017
  29. 29.
    Todeva E, Knoke D (2005) Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Manag Decis 43(1):123–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tone K (2002) A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 143:32–41MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tran TT (2016) Evaluating and forecasting performance using past data of an industry: an analysis of electronic manufacturing services industry. Int J Adv Appl Sci 3(12):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tran TT (2017) Forecasting strategies and analyzing the numbers of incoming students: case in Taiwanese vocational schools. Int J Adv Appl Sci 4(9):86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trinh HXP, Tran TT (2017) An analyzing case: numbers of Taiwanese students and their expenditures by using grey system theory to forecast. Int J Adv Appl Sci 4(9):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    VCCINews (2013) Creating momentum for Vietnam’s logistics to take off. http://vccinews.com/news_detail.asp?news_id=29618. Accessed Apr 2017
  36. 36.
    Vyas NM, Shelburn WL, Rogers DC (1995) An analysis of strategic alliances: forms, functions and framework. J Bus Ind Market 10(3):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang CN, Tsai JH, Teng HC (2008) An approach on alliance for online game industry. In: 3rd International conference on innovative computing information and control, ICICIC’08. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang CN, Nguyen NT, Tran TT (2015) Integrated DEA models and grey system theory to evaluate past-to-future performance: a case of Indian electricity industry. Sci World J 2015:638710.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/638710 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    World Bank (2014) Efficient logistics: a key to Vietnam’s competitiveness. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/01/07/efficient-logistics-a-key-to-vietnams-competitiveness. Accessed May 2017
  40. 40.
    Yoshino MY, Rangan S (1995) Strategic alliances: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessInternational University – Vietnam National University HCMCHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Scientific Research OfficeLac Hong UniversityBien Hoa CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations