Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analyzing genetic diseases using multimedia processing techniques associative decision tree-based learning and Hopfield dynamic neural networks from medical images

  • Intelligent Biomedical Data Analysis and Processing
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 28 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Genetic diseases are the most common next-generation diseases because of the improper mutation of the genes and DNA. These genetic diseases are failed to predict with an accurate manner in the beginning stage by using the particular genes and related information. So, the genetic diseases are identified in the medical systems by utilizing the hybridization of multimedia techniques such as big data and related soft computing techniques.Initially, the genetic disease-related medical images are collected from healthcare sectors, and from the genetic image, various genetic data are collected from the large amount of datasets in which the major challenge is too high dimensionality that increases the complexity of the genetic disease prediction system. So, in this paper the complexity of the system is reduced by using the associative decision tree-based learning and Hopfield dynamic neural networks (HDNN). After collecting the data from the various resources, the immune clonal selection algorithm approach is used to remove inconsistent data and minimize the dimensionality of data. The selected features are trained by the proposed associative decision tree approach which helps to compare with the testing features using the HDNN that successfully recognize the genetic disease-based features effectively. The excellence of the system is measured with the aid of the experimental outcomes that are corresponding to the forecasting methods such as greedy algorithm, rough set method and artificial bee colony, and the comparison is made with the avail of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Aguas R, Ferguson NM (2013) Feature selection methods for identifying genetic determinants of host species in RNA viruses. http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003254

  2. Al-Sheshtawi KA, Abdul-Kader HM, Ismail NA (2010) Artificial immune clonal selection classification algorithms for classifying malware and benign processes using API call sequences. IJCSNS 10(4):31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anitha DPV (2013) Feature selection by rough–quick reduct algorithm. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2(8):2319

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arunkumar N, Mohammed MA, Mostafa SA, Ibrahim DA, Rodrigues JJPC, de Albuquerque VHC (2018) Fully automatic model-based segmentation and classification approach for MRI brain tumor using artificial neural networks. Concurr Comput Pract Exp. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barati M, Ebrahimi M (2016) Identification of genes involved in the early stages of alzheimer disease using a neural network algorithm. Gene Cell Tissue 3(3):e38415. https://doi.org/10.17795/gct-38415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Cao L, Li Z, Hemanth DJ, Wu L, de Albuquerque VHC, Shi F (2018) Evaluation on diabetic plantar pressure data-set employing auto-segmentation technologies. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3838-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chernyshov KR (2009) An information theoretic approach to neural network based system identification. In: International conference on control and communications

  8. Cho J-H, Lin A, Wang K (2013) Kernel-based method for feature selection and disease diagnosis using transcriptomics data. J Syst Biomed 1:254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn D, Zuk O, Kaplan T (2018) Enhancer identification using transfer and adversarial deep learning of DNA sequences. bioRxiv preprint first posted online 13 Feb 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/26420

  10. De Albuquerque VHC, Nunes TM, Pereira DR et al (2018) Robust automated cardiac arrhythmia detection in ECG beat signals. Neural Comput Appl 29:679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2472-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das A, Kempe D (2011) Submodular meets spectral: greedy algorithms for subset selection, sparse approximation and dictionary selection. International conference on machine learning

  12. Floares AG, Floares AG (2008) Artificial intelligence support for interferon treatment decision in chronic hepatitis B. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 44:110–115

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gheyas IA, Smith LS (2010) Feature subset selection in large dimensionality domains. Pattern Recogn 43:5–13

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginn SL, Alexander IE, Edelstein ML, Abedi MR, Wixon J (2013) Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2012: an update. J Gene Med 15(2):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.2698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths AJF, Wessler SR, Carroll SB, Doebley J (2012) Introduction to genetic analysis, vol 10. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gurovich Y, Hanani Y, Bar O, Fleischer N, Gelbman D, Basel-Salmon L, Krawitz P, Kamphausen SB, Zenker M, Bird LM, Gripp KW (2018) DeepGestalt: identifying rare genetic syndromes using deep learning. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.07637.pdf

  17. Hassan M, Abdalla MI, Ahmed SR, Akil W, Esmat G, Khamis S, ElHefnaw M (2011) The decision tree mode for prediction the response to the treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. N Y Sci J 4(7):69–79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Inbarani HH, Kumar SS (2015) Hybrid tolerance rough set based intelligent approaches for social tagging systems. Big data in complex systems: challenges and opportunities. Stud Big Data 9(1):231–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keane MG, Pyeritz RE (2008) Medical management of Marfan syndrome. Circulation. 117(21):2802–2813. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.693523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. King R, Karwath A, Clare A, Dehaspe L (2001) The utility of different representations of protein sequence for predicting functional class. Bioinformatics 17(5):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y (2005) Preimplantation diagnosis: a realistic option for assisted reproduction and genetic practice. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17(2):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000162189.76349.c5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar SS, Inbarani HH (2013) Analysis of mixed c-means clustering approach for brain tumour gene expression data. Int J Data Anal Tech Strateg 5(2):214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindquist KJ et al (2013) The impact of improved microarray coverage and larger sample sizes on future genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 37(4):383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lopes CRS, Ludermir TB, de Souto MCP, Ludermir AB (2002) Neural networks for the analysis of common mental disorders factors. J Neural Netw. ISBN-0-7695-1709-9

  25. Motsinger-Reif AA, Ritchie MD (2008) Neural networks for genetic epidemiology: past, present, and future. J Bio Data Min 1(3):1

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nunes TM, Coelho AL, Lima CA, Papa JP, de Albuquerque VHC (2014) EEG signal classification for epilepsy diagnosis via optimum path forest: a systematic assessment. Neurocomputing 136:103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pandey B, Ranjan S, Shukla A, Tiwari R (2010) Sentence recognition using Hopfield neural network. Int J Comput Sci 7(4):6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Panthonga R, Srivihok A (2015) Wrapper feature subset selection for dimension reduction based on ensemble learning algorithm. Proc Comput Sc 72:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patro SGK, Sahu KK (2015) Normalization: a preprocessing stage. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1503/1503.06462.pdf

  30. Peixoto SA, Rebouças Filho PP, Kumar NA, de Albuquerque VHC (2018) Automatic classification of pulmonary diseases using a structural co-occurrence matrix. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3736-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peng Y, Wu Z, Jiang J (2010) A novel feature selection approach for biomedical data classification. J Biomed Inf 43:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rattanakronkul N, Waiyamai K (2002) Combining association rule discovery and data classification for protein structure prediction. In: The international conference on bio-informatics

  33. Rebouças Filho PP, Cortez PC, da Silva Barros AC, De Albuquerque VHC (2014) Novel adaptive balloon active contour method based on internal force for image segmentation: a systematic evaluation on synthetic and real images. Expert Syst Appl 41(17):7707–7721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shakeel PM, Baskar S, Dhulipala VRS, Mishra S, Jaber MM (2018) Maintaining security and privacy in health care system using learning based deep-Q-networks. J Med Syst 42:186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shalabi LA, Shaaban Z, Kasasbeh B (2006) Data mining: a preprocessing engine. J Comput Sci 2:735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sridhar KP, Baskar S, Shakeel PM et al (2018) Developing brain abnormality recognize system using multi-objective pattern producing neural network. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-1058-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang ZY, Guo ZY, Huang LH, Liu XZ (2017) Dynamical behavior of complex-valued hopfield neural networks with discontinuous activation functions. Neural Process Lett 45(3):1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu C, Li P (2017) Pseudo almost periodic solutions for high-order Hopfield neural networks with time-varying leakage delays. Neural Process Lett 46(1):41–58

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Yaacoub C, Mhanna G, Rihana S (2017) A genetic-based feature selection approach in the identification of left/right hand motor imagery for a brain–computer interface. J Brain Sci 7:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ziarko W (2008) Probabilistic approach to rough sets. Int J Approx Reason Sci Direct 49(2):272

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, Community College Research Unit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Al-Maitah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-08192-3

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Maitah, M. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analyzing genetic diseases using multimedia processing techniques associative decision tree-based learning and Hopfield dynamic neural networks from medical images. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 791–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-04004-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-04004-9

Keywords

Navigation