Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating construction duration of diaphragm wall using firefly-tuned least squares support vector machine

Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diaphragm wall is a widely used method for excavating the foundation of buildings. Foundation construction plays a prominent role since it is a predecessor of many other activities. Therefore, estimating the diaphragm wall duration at the planning phase is a practical need of the project manager. This research proposes an artificial intelligence method, named as FLSVM, for predicting duration of diaphragm wall construction. The proposed method is developed by a fusion of the least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) and the firefly algorithm (FA). LS-SVM is used to generalize the mapping function between the diaphragm wall duration and its influencing factors. Meanwhile, the FA method is employed for finding an appropriate set of the LS-SVM tuning parameters. Historical cases collected from construction projects in Taiwan are utilized to establish and verify the new approach. Based on the experimental results, the FLSVM model can deliver accurate forecasts since it has achieved a comparatively low prediction deviation which is <10%. This fact proves that the proposed approach is very helpful for construction managers when planning the schedule of diaphragm wall-related projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Tamaro M, Pamukcu S, Lopez P (1993) Prediction of structural slurry wall behavior. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, June 1–4, 1993

  2. Ou C-Y (2006) Deep excavation—theory and practice. Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang M, Chen S, Chen S (2006) Innovative central opening strut system for foundation excavation. J Constr Eng Manag 132:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzeng R-J, Pan N-F (2006) Learning heuristics for determining slurry wall panel lengths. Autom Constr 15:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xanthakos PP (1993) Slurry walls as structural systems. Mcgraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. El-Razek M (1999) New method for construction of diaphragm walls. J Constr Eng Manag 125:233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sears K, Sears G, Clough R (2008) Construction project management: a practical guide to field construction management, 5th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mubarak S (2010) Construction project scheduling and control. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng M-Y, Hoang N-D (2013) Interval estimation of construction cost at completion using least squares support vector machine. J Civ Eng Manag 20:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suykens J, Gestel JV, Brabanter JD, Moor BD, Vandewalle J (2002) Least square support vector machines. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Tien Bui D, Tuan TA, Hoang N-D, Thanh NQ, Nguyen DB, Van Liem N, Pradhan B (2016) Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced landslides for the Lao Cai area (Vietnam) using a hybrid intelligent approach of least squares support vector machines inference model and artificial bee colony optimization. Landslides, pp 1–12

  12. Zhang N (2016) Extended least squares support vector machines for ordinal regression. Neural Comput Appl 27:1497–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng M-Y, Hoang N-D, Limanto L, Wu Y-W (2014) A novel hybrid intelligent approach for contractor default status prediction. Knowl Based Syst 71:314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng M, Hoang N (2014) Risk score inference for bridge maintenance project using evolutionary fuzzy least squares support vector machine. J Comput Civ Eng ASCE 28:04014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karaboga D, Kaya E (2016) An adaptive and hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm (aABC) for ANFIS training. Appl Soft Comput 49:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shabani MO, Rahimipour MR, Tofigh AA, Davami P (2015) Refined microstructure of compo cast nanocomposites: the performance of combined neuro-computing, fuzzy logic and particle swarm techniques. Neural Comput Appl 26:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nazari A, Sanjayan JG (2015) Modelling of compressive strength of geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete by optimized support vector machine. Ceram Int 41:12164–12177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang F, Li J (2016) Artificial bee colony algorithm optimized support vector regression for system reliability analysis of slopes. J Comput Civ Eng 30:04015040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. Int J Bio-inspired Comput 2:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang XS (2008) Firefly algorithm. Luniver Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fister I, Fister I Jr, Yang X-S, Brest J (2013) A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 13:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang X-S (2014) Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Baykasoğlu A, Ozsoydan FB (2014) An improved firefly algorithm for solving dynamic multidimensional knapsack problems. Expert Syst Appl 41:3712–3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amiri B, Hossain L, Crawford JW, Wigand RT (2013) Community detection in complex networks: multi-objective enhanced firefly algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 46:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang JB (1997) An integrated knowledge acquisition and problem solving model for experience-oriented problems in construction management. Ph.D. dissertation, National Central University, Taiwan

  26. Bishop C (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoang N-D, Tien Bui D, Liao K-W (2016) Groutability estimation of grouting processes with cement grouts using Differential Flower Pollination Optimized Support Vector Machine. Appl Soft Comput 45:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheng M-Y, Tsai H-C, Ko C-H, Chang W-T (2008) Evolutionary fuzzy neural inference system for decision making in geotechnical engineering. J Comput Civ Eng 22:272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang L, Zeng Y, Chen T (2015) Back propagation neural network with adaptive differential evolution algorithm for time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 42:855–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ekonomou L, Christodoulou CA, Mladenov V (2016) An artificial neural network software tool for the assessment of the electric field around metal oxide surge arresters. Neural Comput Appl 27:1143–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cao MS, Pan LX, Gao YF, Novák D, Ding ZC, Lehký D, Li XL (2015) Neural network ensemble-based parameter sensitivity analysis in civil engineering systems. Neural Comput Appl 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-2132-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Erzin Y, Ecemis N (2015) The use of neural networks for CPT-based liquefaction screening. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chou J-S, Chiu C-K, Farfoura M, Al-Taharwa I (2011) Optimizing the prediction accuracy of concrete compressive strength based on a comparison of data-mining techniques. J Comput Civ Eng 25:242–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moller MF (1993) A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw 6:525–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Riedmiller M, Braun H (1993) A direct adaptive method for faster back-propagation learning: The RPROP algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, San Francisco, CA, 28 Mar 1993–01 Apr 1993, pp 586–591

  37. Arlot S (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4(2010):40–79

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nhat-Duc Hoang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, MY., Hoang, ND. Estimating construction duration of diaphragm wall using firefly-tuned least squares support vector machine. Neural Comput & Applic 30, 2489–2497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2840-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2840-z

Keywords

Navigation