Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training radial basis function networks using biogeography-based optimizer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Training artificial neural networks is considered as one of the most challenging machine learning problems. This is mainly due to the presence of a large number of solutions and changes in the search space for different datasets. Conventional training techniques mostly suffer from local optima stagnation and degraded convergence, which make them impractical for datasets with many features. The literature shows that stochastic population-based optimization techniques suit this problem better and are reliably alternative because of high local optima avoidance and flexibility. For the first time, this work proposes a new learning mechanism for radial basis function networks based on biogeography-based optimizer as one of the most well-regarded optimizers in the literature. To prove the efficacy of the proposed methodology, it is employed to solve 12 well-known datasets and compared to 11 current training algorithms including gradient-based and stochastic approaches. The paper considers changing the number of neurons and investigating the performance of algorithms on radial basis function networks with different number of parameters as well. A statistical test is also conducted to judge about the significance of the results. The results show that the biogeography-based optimizer trainer is able to substantially outperform the current training algorithms on all datasets in terms of classification accuracy, speed of convergence, and entrapment in local optima. In addition, the comparison of trainers on radial basis function networks with different neurons size reveal that the biogeography-based optimizer trainer is able to train radial basis function networks with different number of structural parameters effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.

References

  1. Aljarah I, Ludwig SA (2012) Parallel particle swarm optimization clustering algorithm based on mapreduce methodology. In: Nature and biologically inspired computing (NaBIC), 2012 fourth world congress on, pp 104–111. doi:10.1109/NaBIC.2012.6402247

  2. de Almeida Rego JB, de Medeiros Martins A, de Costa B (2014) Deterministic system identification using RBF networks. Math Probl Eng 2014:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayala H, Vicente H, Coelho LDS (2014) Multiobjective cuckoo search applied toradial basis function neural networks training for system identification. In: World congress, vol 19, pp 2539–2544

  4. Bajer D, Zorić B, Martinović G (2015) Automatic design of radial basis function networks through enhanced differential evolution. In: Hybrid artificial intelligent systems, Springer, pp 244–256

  5. Bansal J, Singh P, Saraswat M, Verma A, Jadon SS, Abraham A (2011) Inertia weight strategies in particle swarm optimization. In: Nature and biologically inspired computing (NaBIC), 2011 third world congress on, IEEE, pp 633–640

  6. Billings SA, Zheng GL (1995) Radial basis function network configuration using genetic algorithms. Neural Netw 8(6):877–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. BoussaïD I, Lepagnot J, Siarry P (2013) A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inform Sci 237:82–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Broomhead D, Lowe D (1988) Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst 2:321–355

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Castao A, Hervas-Martinez C, Gutiérrez PA, Fernandez-Navarro F, Garcia MM (2009) Classification by evolutionary generalized radial basis functions. In: Intelligent systems design and applications, 2009. ISDA’09. Ninth international conference on IEEE, pp 203–208

  10. Chaowanawatee K, Heednacram A (2012) Implementation of cuckoo search in RBF neural network for flood forecasting. In: Proceedings of the 2012 fourth international conference on computational intelligence, communication systems and networks, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, CICSYN ’12, pp 22–26. doi:10.1109/CICSyN.2012.15

  11. Chng E, Chen S, Mulgrew B (1996) Gradient radial basis function networks for nonlinear and nonstationary time series prediction. Neural Netw IEEE Trans 7(1):190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chun-tao M, Xiao-xia L, Li-yong Z (2007) Radial basis function neural network based on ant colony optimization. In: Computational intelligence and security workshops, 2007. International Conference on CISW 2007, pp 59–62. doi:10.1109/CISW.2007.4425446

  13. Cruz DPF, Maia RD, da Silva LA, de Castro LN (2016) BeeRBF: a bee-inspired data clustering approach to design RBF neural network classifiers. Neurocomputing 172:427–437. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dash CSK, Behera AK, Pandia MK, Dehuri S (2013) Neural networks training based on differential evolution in radial basis function networks for classification of web logs. In: Distributed computing and internet technology, Springer, pp 183–194

  15. Ding S, Xu L, Su C, Jin F (2012) An optimizing method of RBF neural network based on genetic algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 21(2):333–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Du KL, Swamy MN (2006) Neural networks in a softcomputing framework. Springer, NewYork

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogel DB (1997) The advantages of evolutionary computation. In: BCEC, Citeseer, pp 1–11

  18. Gan M, Peng H, ping Dong X (2012) A hybrid algorithm to optimize RBF network architecture and parameters for nonlinear time series prediction. Appl Math Model 36(7):2911–2919. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.066, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0307904X11006251

  19. Goldberg DE et al (1989) Genetic algorithms in search optimization and machine learning, vol 412. Addison-wesley Reading, Menlo Park

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harpham C, Dawson CW, Brown MR (2004) A review of genetic algorithms applied to training radial basis function networks. Neural Comput Appl 13(3):193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho YC, Pepyne DL (2002) Simple explanation of the no free lunch theorem of optimization. Cybern Syst Anal 38(2):292–298

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Horng M (2013) Training radial basis function network using the honey bee mating optimization. Comput Model New Technol 17(3):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  24. Horng MH, Lee YX, Lee MC, Liou RJ (2012) Firefly metaheuristic algorithm for training the radial basis function network for data classification and disease diagnosis. In: Parpinnelli R, Lopes HS (eds) Theory and New Applications of Swarm Intelligence, InTech, Rijeka, pp 1–19

  25. Huang CM, Wang FL (2007) An RBF network with OLS and EPSO algorithms for real-time power dispatch. Power Syst IEEE Trans 22(1):96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunter D, Yu H, Pukish MS III, Kolbusz J, Wilamowski BM (2012) Selection of proper neural network sizes and architectures a comparative study. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 8(2):228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (abc) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39(3):459–471

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuncheva LI (1997) Initializing of an RBF network by a genetic algorithm. Neurocomputing 14(3):273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kurban T, Beşdok E (2009) A comparison of rbf neural network training algorithms for inertial sensor based terrain classification. Sensors 9(8):6312–6329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee MJ, Choi YK (2004) An adaptive neurocontroller using RBFN for robot manipulators. Ind Electron IEEE Trans 51(3):711–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leonard J, Kramer MA et al (1991) Radial basis function networks for classifying process faults. Control Syst IEEE 11(3):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lichman M (2013) UCI machine learning repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  33. Mak MW, Cho KW (1998) Genetic evolution of radial basis function centers for pattern classification. In: Neural networks proceedings, 1998. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence. The 1998 IEEE International Joint Conference on IEEE, vol 1, pp 669–673

  34. Mezura-Montes E, Velázquez-Reyes J, Coello Coello CA (2006) A comparative study of differential evolution variants for global optimization. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, ACM, pp 485–492

  35. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Let a biogeography-based optimizer train your multi-layer perceptron. Inf Sci 269:188–209

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohaghegi S, Valle YD, Venayagamoorthy GK, Harley RG (2005) A comparison of PSO and backpropagation for training RBF neural networks for identification of a power system with STATCOM. In: Swarm intelligence symposium, 2005. SIS 2005. Proceedings 2005 IEEE, IEEE, pp 381–384

  37. Noman S, Shamsuddin SM, Hassanien AE (2009) Hybrid learning enhancement of RBF network with particle swarm optimization. In: Foundations of computational, intelligence Vol 1, Springer, pp 381–397

  38. Ovreiu M, Simon D (2010) Biogeography-based optimization of neuro-fuzzy system parameters for diagnosis of cardiac disease. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, ACM, pp 1235–1242

  39. Pedersen MEH, Chipperfield AJ (2008) Tuning differential evolution for artificial neural networks. HL0803 Hvass Laboratories

  40. Qasem SN, Shamsuddin SM (2011) Radial basis function network based on time variant multi-objective particle swarm optimization for medical diseases diagnosis. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):1427–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Qasem SN, Shamsuddin SM, Zain AM (2012) Multi-objective hybrid evolutionary algorithms for radial basis function neural network design. Knowl Based Syst 27:475–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwenker F, Kestler HA, Palm G (2001) Three learning phases for radial-basis-function networks. Neural Netw 14(4):439–458

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheta AF, Jong KD (2001) Time-series forecasting using ga-tuned radial basis functions. Inf Sci 133(34):221 – 228, doi:10.1016/S0020-0255(01)00086-X, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002002550100086X, evolutionary Algorithms

  44. Simon D (2008) Biogeography-based optimization. Evol Comput IEEE Trans 12(6):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sun X, Liu D, Li A (2011) The use of RBF based on ant colony algorithm and fisher ratio for eddy current nondestructive detecting system. In: Progress In electromagnetics research symposium proceedings, pp 633–636

  46. Talal R (2014) Comparative study between the (ba) algorithm and (pso) algorithm to train (rbf) network at data classification. Int J Comput Appl 92(5):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tsekouras GE, Tsimikas J (2013) On training RBF neural networks using inputoutput fuzzy clustering and particle swarm optimization. Fuzzy Sets Syst 221:65–89. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2012.10.004, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011412004460, theme: Clustering

  48. Vakil-Baghmisheh MT, Pavešić N (2004) Training RBF networks with selective backpropagation. Neurocomputing 62:39–64. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2003.11.011, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231203005411

  49. Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. Evol Comput IEEE Trans 1(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wu Y, Wang H, Zhang B, Du (2012) Using radial basis function networks for function approximation and classification. ISRN Appl Math 2012:1–34

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Xin J, Chen G, Hai Y (2009) A particle swarm optimizer with multi-stage linearly-decreasing inertia weight. In: Computational sciences and optimization, 2009. CSO 2009. International joint conference on IEEE, vol 1, pp 505–508

  52. Yang XS (2009) Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: Stochastic algorithms: foundations and applications, Springer, pp 169–178

  53. Yang XS (2010) Firefly algorithm, levy flights and global optimization. In: Research and development in intelligent systems XXVI, Springer, pp 209–218

  54. Yang XS (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010), Springer, pp 65–74

  55. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In: Nature and biologically inspired computing, 2009. NaBIC 2009. World congress on IEEE, pp 210–214

  56. Yang XS, He X (2013) Firefly algorithm: recent advances and applications. Int J Swarm Intell 1(1):36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yang XS, Deb S, Fong S (2011) Accelerated particle swarm optimization and support vector machine for business optimization and applications. In: Networked digital technologies, Springer, pp 53–66

  58. Yu B, He X (2006) Training radial basis function networks with differential evolution. In: Granular computing, 2006 IEEE international conference on IEEE, pp 369–372

  59. Zhang J, Sanderson AC (2009) Jade: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive. Evol Comput IEEE Trans 13(5):945–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao ZQ, Huang DS (2007) A mended hybrid learning algorithm for radial basis function neural networks to improve generalization capability. Appl Math Model 31(7):1271–1281

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Information Technology Department, King Abdullah II School for Information Technology, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

    Ibrahim Aljarah & Hossam Faris

  2. School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia

    Seyedali Mirjalili

  3. The King Hussein Faculty of Computing Sciences, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman, Jordan

    Nailah Al-Madi

Authors
  1. Ibrahim Aljarah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossam Faris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seyedali Mirjalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nailah Al-Madi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Aljarah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aljarah, I., Faris, H., Mirjalili, S. et al. Training radial basis function networks using biogeography-based optimizer. Neural Comput & Applic 29, 529–553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2559-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2559-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation