Multi-focus image fusion is a process of combining a set of images that have been captured from the same scene but with different focuses in order to construct an additional sharper image. This process plays an important role in the image processing and machine vision fields. Various algorithms have been developed for this task. The key challenge in the design of multi-focus image fusion algorithms is how to evaluate the local content information of each image from the source images. Simple, but effective, block-based techniques at pixel level are widely used for multi-focus image fusion. However, a fixed block size may not be applicable to every application. A block size that is too small or too large is also not desirable. Hence, optimization of the block size is necessary in order to obtain a fused image that comprises the sharper parts of the source images. Recently, a number of techniques based on evolutionary computation have been applied to block-based multi-focus image fusion. The artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is one of the more popular evolutionary computational approaches used to find an optimal solution. In this paper, an efficient and robust block-based multi-focus image fusion method based on the optimal selection of sharper image blocks from source images using best-so-far ABC strategies is proposed. Experiment results show that the proposed method is able to provide good results and outperforms other conventional methods, both visually and quantitatively.
Block-based multi-focus image fusion Energy of Laplacian (EOL) Sum-modified-Laplacian (SML) Contrast visibility Spatial frequency (SF) Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm Best-so-far ABC
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work is partially supported by the Faculty of Engineering at Si Racha, Kasetsart University Sriracha Campus (2557/2).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This chapter does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Goshtasby AA, Nikolov S (2007) Guest editorial: image fusion: advances in the state of the art. Information Fusion 8:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg R, Gupta P, Kaur H (2014) Survey on multi-focus image fusion algorithms. In: Proceedings of recent advances in engineering and computational sciences, pp 1–5Google Scholar
Irshad H, Kamran M, Siddiqui AB, Hussain A (2009) Image fusion using computational intelligence: a survey. In: Second international conference on environmental and computer science, pp 128–132Google Scholar
Yang J, Ma Y, Yao W, Lu WT (2008) A spatial domain and frequency domain integrated approach to fusion multifocus images. Int Arch Photogram Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 37(part B7):1147–1150Google Scholar
Shah P, Merchant SN, Desai UB (2011) An efficient spatial domain fusion scheme for multifocus images using statistical properties of neighborhood. In: IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo (ICME), pp 1–6Google Scholar
Roosta I, Karimi N, Mirmahboub B, Samavi S (2014) Multi focus image fusion using categorization of energy levels. In: 22nd Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE), pp 1739–1744Google Scholar
Niu Y, Shen L, Wu L, Bu Y (2010) Optimizing the number of decomposition levels for wavelet-based multifocus image fusion. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress on intelligent control and automation, pp 6351–6356Google Scholar
Tian J, Chen L (2012) Adaptive multi-focus image fusion using a wavelet-based statistical sharpness measure. Signal Process 92:2137–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li H, Wei S, Chai Y (2012) Multifocus image fusion scheme based on feature contrast in the lifting stationary wavelet domain. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 39:1–16Google Scholar
Chai Y, Li H, Li Z (2011) Multi-focus image fusion scheme using focused region detection and multi-resolution. Int J Opt Commun 284:4376–4389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaige W, Lihong G, Hong D, Heqi W, Luo L, Mingzhen S (2013) Hybridizing harmony search with biogeography based optimization for global numerical optimization. J Comput Theor Nanosci 10:2312–2322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang JW, Shi YQ, Dai XH (1999) A segmentation-based image coding algorithm using the features of human vision system. J Image Graph 4:400–404Google Scholar
Hongmei W, Cong N, Yanjun L, Ke Z, Lihua C (2011) A novel fusion algorithm for multi-focus image. In: Proceedings of the international conference on applied informatics and communication, pp 641–647Google Scholar
Nayar SK, Nakagawa Y (1994) Shape from focus. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:824–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report-TR06, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department, Erciyes University, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
Biesmeijer JC, Seeley TD (2005) The use of waggle dance information by honey bees throughout their foraging careers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39:459–471zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banharnsakun A, Achalakul T, Sirinaovakul B (2011) The best-so-far selection in artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11:2888–2901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banharnsakun A, Sirinaovakul B, Achalakul T (2012) Job shop scheduling with the best-so-far ABC. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banharnsakun A, Sirinaovakul B, Achalakul T (2013) The best-so-far ABC with multiple patrilines for clustering problems. Neurocomputing 116:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banharnsakun A, Sirinaovakul B, Achalakul T (2012) The performance and sensitivity of the parameters setting on the best-so-far ABC. In: Bui LT et al (eds) SEAL 2012. LNCS, vol 7673, pp 248–257Google Scholar
Banharnsakun A, Tanathong S (2014) Object detection based on template matching through use of best-so-far ABC. Comput Intell Neurosci 2014:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS (1995) Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43:2959–2965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li S, Kwok JT, Wang Y (2001) Combination of images with diverse focuses using the spatial frequency. Inf Fusion 2:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu Z, Blasch E, Xue Z, Zhao J, Laganiere R, Wu W (2012) Objective assessment of multiresolution image fusion algorithms for context enhancement in night vision: a comparative study. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34:94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng Y, Essock EA, Hansen BC, Haun AM (2007) A new metric based on extended spatial frequency and its application to DWT based fusion algorithms. Inf Fusion 8:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar