Skip to main content
Log in

Rainfall data analyzing using moving average (MA) model and wavelet multi-resolution intelligent model for noise evaluation to improve the forecasting accuracy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rainfall forecasting and approximation of its magnitude have a huge and imperative role in water management and runoff forecasting. The main objective of this paper is to obtain the relationship between rainfall time series achieved from wavelet transform (WT) and moving average (MA) in Klang River basin, Malaysia. For this purpose, the Haar and Dmey WTs were applied to decompose the rainfall time series into 7, 10 different resolution levels, respectively. Several preprocessing case studies based on 2-, 3-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-month MAs were carried out to discover a longer-term trend compared to a shorter-term MA. The information and data were gathered from Klang Gates Dam, Malaysia, from 1997 to 2008. Regarding the behavior, the time series of 10-, 15-, 20-, and 30-day rainfall are decomposed into approximation and details coefficient with different kind of WT. Correlation coefficient R 2 and root-mean-square error criteria are applied to examine the performance of the models. The results show that there are some similarities between MA filters and wavelet approximation sub-series filters due to noise elimination. Moreover, the results obtained that the high correlation with MAs can be achieved via Dmey WT compared to Haar wavelet for rainfall data. Moreover, clean signals could be used as model inputs to improve the model performance. Therefore, signal decomposition techniques for the purpose of data preprocessing could be favorable and could be appropriate for elimination of the errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akrami SA, Nourani V, Hakim SJS (2014) Development of nonlinear model based on wavelet-ANFIS for rainfall forecasting at Klang Gates Dam. Water Resour Manag 28(10):2999–3018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cannas B, Fanni A, See L, Sias G (2006) Data preprocessing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: wavelet transforms and data partitioning. Phys Chem Earth 31:1164–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang FJ, Chen L (1998) Real coded genetic algorithm for rule-based flood control reservoir management. Water Resour Manag 12(3):185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen GY, Bui TD, Krzyzak A (2009) Invariant pattern recognition using radon, dual-tree complex wavelet and Fourier transforms. Pattern Recogn 42:2013–2019

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen RJC, Bloomfield P, Fu JS (2003) An evaluation of alternative forecasting methods to recreation visitation. J leis Res 35(4):441–454

    Google Scholar 

  6. Earth Observation Centre, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Malaysia 2013

  7. Fonseca ES, Guido RC, Scalassara PR (2007) Wavelet time–frequency analysis and least squares support vector machines for the identification of voice disorders. Comput Biol Med 37:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu Y, Serrai H (2011) Fast magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) using wavelet encoding and parallel imaging: in vitro results. J Magn Reson 211:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Genovese L, Videaud B, Ospici M, Deutschd T, Goedeckere S, Méhaut JF (2011) Daubechies wavelets for high performance electronic structure calculations. CR Mec 339:149–164

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lisi F, Nicolis O, Sandri M (1995) Combining singular-spectrum analysis and neural networks for time series forecasting. Neural Process Lett 2(4):6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15:101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallat SG (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Masset P (2008) Analysis of financial time-series using Fourier and Wavelet Methods, University of Fribourg (Switzerland)—Faculty of Economics and Social Science

  14. Newbold P, Carlson WL, Thorne BM (2003) Statistics for business and economics (fifth version). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nourani V, Komasi M, Mano A (2009) A multivariate ANN-wavelet approach for rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour Manag 23:2877–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Partal T, Kisi O (2007) Wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model for precipitation forecasting. J Hydrol 342:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rioul O, Vetterli M (1991) Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE SP Magazine. pp 14–38

  18. Serrai H, Senhadji L (2005) Acquisition time reduction in magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging using discrete wavelet encoding. J Magn Reson 177:22–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shafiekhah M, Moghaddam MP, Sheikh El Eslami MK (2011) Price forecasting of day-ahead electricity markets using a hybrid forecast method. Energy Convers Manag 52:2165–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sifuzzaman M, Islamand MR, Ali MZ (2009) Application of wavelet transform and its advantages compared to fourier transform. J Phys Sci 13:121–134

    Google Scholar 

  21. Syed AR, Aqil B, Badar S (2010) Forecasting network traffic load using wavelet filters and seasonal autoregressive moving average model. Int J Comput Electr Eng 2(6):1793–8163

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu CL, Chau KW, Li YS (2009) Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction. J Hydrol 372:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang X, Ren H, Li B (2008) Embedded zero tree wavelets coding based on adaptive fuzzy clustering for image compression. Image Vis Comput 26:812–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao X, Ye B (2010) Convolution wavelet packet transform and its applications to signal processing. Digit Signal Process 20:1352–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am deeply indebted to Dr. Akrami and Dr.Fakheri Fard from University Of Tabriz for their encouragement and guidance throughout this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Ahmad Akrami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akrami, S.A., El-Shafie, A., Naseri, M. et al. Rainfall data analyzing using moving average (MA) model and wavelet multi-resolution intelligent model for noise evaluation to improve the forecasting accuracy. Neural Comput & Applic 25, 1853–1861 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1675-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1675-0

Keywords

Navigation