Skip to main content
Log in

NECM: Neutrosophic evidential c-means clustering algorithm

  • Advances in Intelligent Data Processing and Analysis
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new clustering algorithm, neutrosophic evidential c-means (NECM) is introduced based on the neutrosophic set (NS) and the evidence theory. The clustering analysis is formulated as a constrained minimization problem, whose solution depends on an objective function. In the objective function of NECM, two new types of rejection have been introduced using NS theory: the ambiguity rejection which concerns the patterns lying near the class boundaries, and the distance rejection dealing with patterns that are far away from all the classes. A belief function evidence theory is employed to make the final decision, and it is defined using the concept of Dezert–Smarandache theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, which is a natural extension of the classical Dempster–Shafer theory. A variety of experiments were conducted using synthetic and real data sets. The results are promising and compared favorably with the results from the evidential c-means algorithm on the same data sets. We also applied the proposed method into the image segmentation. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can be considered as a promising tool for data clustering and image processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Research/Projects/CS/vision/grouping/segbench/.

  2. http://vismod.media.mit.edu/vismod/imagery/VisionTexture/vistex.html.

References

  1. Andenberg MR (1973) Cluster analysis for applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pal SK (1991) Fuzzy tools in the management of uncertainty in pattern recognition, image analysis, vision and expert systems. Int J Syst Sci 22:511–549

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek JC (1987) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruspini E (1969) A new approach to clustering. Inf Control 15:22–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Godara S, Verma A (2013) Analysis of various clustering algorithms. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 3(1):186–189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verma M, Srivastava M, Chack N, Diswar AK, Gupta N (2012) A comparative study of various clustering algorithms in data mining. Int J Eng Res Appl 2(3):1379–1384

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baraldi A, Blonda P (1999) A survey of fuzzy clustering algorithms for pattern recognition—part I. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 29(6):778–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang H, Liu Y, Ye F, Xi H, Zhu M (2013) Study of clustering algorithm based on fuzzy C-means and immunological partheno genetic. J Softw 8(1):134–141

  9. Omar W, Badr A, El-Fattah A (2013) Hegazy, clustering algorithm with cluster analysis techniques. J Comput Sci 9(6):780–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen N, Xu Z, Xia M (2013) Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Appl Math Model 37:2197–2211

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gana H, Sanga N, Huanga R, Tongb X, Dana Z (2013) Using clustering analysis to improve semi-supervised classification. Neurocomputing 101(4):290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karaboga D, Ozturk C (2011) A novel clustering approach: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11:652–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Napoleon D, Pavalakodi S (2011) A new method for dimensionality reduction using K-means clustering algorithm for high dimensional data set. Int J Comput Appl 13(7):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smets P (1998) The transferable Belief Model for quantified belief representation. In: Gabbay DM, Smets P (eds) Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 267–301

    Google Scholar 

  15. DenWux T, Masson MH (2004) EVCLUS: evidential clustering of proximity data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 34(1):95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masson MH, Denoeux T (2008) ECM: an evidential version of the fuzzy c-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn 41:1384–1397

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Masson MH, Denoeux T (2009) RECM: relational evidential c-means algorithm. Pattern Recogn Lett 30:1015–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Antoine V, Quost B, Masson MH, Denœux T (2012) CECM: constrained evidential c-means algorithm. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:894–914

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Smarandache F, Dezert J (2009) Advances and applications of DSmT for information fusion, vol 3. American Research Press

  20. Dezert J, Smarandache F (2005) An introduction to DSm theory of plausible, paradoxist, uncertain, and imprecise reasoning for information fusion. In: 13th international congress of cybernetics and systems. Maribor, Slovenia, July 6–10, 2005

  21. Smarandache F (2003) A unifying field in logics neutrosophic logic. Neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic probability, 3rd edn. American Research Press, Rehoboth, NM

  22. Kandasamy WB, Smarandache F (2006) Neutrosophic algebraic structures. Hexis, Phoenix

    Google Scholar 

  23. Salim BC, Mounir S, Farhat F, Eric B (2010) Colour image segmentation using homogeneity method and data fusion techniques. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. doi:10.1155/2010/367297

  24. Zhu YM, Bentabet L, Dupuis O, Kaftandjian V, Babot D, Rombaut M (2002) Automatic determination of mass functions in Dempster–Shafer theory using fuzzy c-means and spatial neighborhood information for image segmentation. Opt Eng 41(4):760–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yager RR (1999) Class of fuzzy measures generated from a Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Int J Intell Syst 14(12):1239–1247

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Windham MP (1985) Numerical classification of proximity data with assignment measure. J Classif 2:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Setiono R (2000) Generating concise and accurate classification rules for breast cancer diagnosis. Artif Intell Med 18:205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanhui Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Sengur, A. NECM: Neutrosophic evidential c-means clustering algorithm. Neural Comput & Applic 26, 561–571 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1648-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1648-3

Keywords

Navigation