Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of artificial neural networks learning algorithms in predicting tendency for suicide

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New approaches adopted by behavioral science researchers to use modern modeling and predicting tools such as artificial neural networks have necessitated the study and comparison of the efficiency of different learning algorithms of these networks for various applications. By using well-known and different learning algorithms, this study examines and compares the Perceptron artificial neural network as predicting tendency for suicide based on risk factors within 33 input parameters framework used in neural network. To find the “best” learning algorithm, the algorithms were compared in terms of train and capability. The experimental data were collected through questionnaires distributed among 800 university students. All questionnaires used in this research were standardized with appropriate validity and reliability. The study findings indicated that LM and BFG algorithms had close evaluation in terms of performance index and true acceptance rate (TAR), and they showed higher predictive accuracy than the other algorithms. Furthermore, CFG algorithm had the minimum training time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anisi J, FathiAshtiani A, Salimi H, Ahmmadi Kh (2005) In evaluation of validity and reliability of Beck suicide scale ideation (BSSI) in soldiers. Mil Med 7(1):33–37 [In Persian]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck AT, Steer RA (1991) Manual for the Beck scale for suicide ideation. Psychological Corporation, San Antonia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatt A (2002) Reservoir properties from well logs using neural networks. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics

  4. Camus T, Wildes R (2002) Reliable and fast eye finding in close-up images. 16th international conference on pattern recognition 1:389–394

  5. Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A (2006) An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. Appearing in proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning. New York

  6. Cramer D (2003) Advanced quantitative data analysis. Open University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daliakopoulos NI, Couliblay P, Tsanis HK (2005) Ground water level forcasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dee GL, Bakhary N, Abdul Rahman A, Hisham Ahmad B (2011) A comparison of artificial neural network learning algorithms for vibration-based damage detection. J Adv Mater Res 163–167:2756–2760

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farahani HA, Kazemi Z, Aghamohamadi S, Ansari M, Aghamohamadi M (2011) Predicting tendency for suicide based on risk factors and ontological identity using artificial neural network. Psychol Res (in press)

  10. Farahani HA, Oreizi HR, Rahiminejad A (2007) Introduction of a statistical model of artificial neural networks in neuropsychopharmacological researches. National Congress of Neuropsychopharmacological. Esfahan Medical University, Ordibehesht month [In Persian]

  11. Farahani HA, Rahiminezhad A, Aghamohamadi S, Kazemi Z (2011) Development and validation of a scale on ontological identity (OIS). J Procedia Soc Behav Sci 15:3268–3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelder M, Mayou R, Geddes J (1999) Oxfordcore text psychiatry, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beal MH (2003) Neutral network design. PWS, Beston

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jack VTu (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. J Clin Epidemoil 49(11):1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawrence J (1994) Introduction to neural networks: design, theory and applications. California Scientific Software Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  16. LeCun Y, Jackel L, Bottou L, Brunot A, Cortes C, Denker J et al (1995) Comparison of learning algorithms for handwritten digit recognition. http://www.research.microsoft.com/~patrice/PDF/lec

  17. Modai I, Saban NI, Stoler M, Valevski A, Saban N (1995) Sensitivity profile of 41 psychiatric parameters determined by neural network in relation to 8-week outcome. J Comput Hum Behav 11(2):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohebbi A, Taheri M, Soltani A (2008) A neural network for predicting saturated liquid density using genetic algorithm for pure and mixed refrigerants. Int J Refrig 31:1317–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nouir Z, Sayrac B, Fouresti′e B, Tabbara W, Brouaye F (2007) Comparison of neural network learning algorithms for prediction enhancement of a planning tool. http://www.ew2007.org/papers/1569014736.pdf

  20. Nair J, Nair S, Kashani J, Reid J, Mistry S, Vargas V (1999) Analysis of the symptoms of depression- a neural network approach. J Psychiatry Res 87:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patrick AS (2008) Fingerprint concerns: performance, usability, and acceptance of fingerprint biometric systems. National Research Council of Canada. http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/essays/fingerprint-concerns-performance-usability-and-acceptance-of-fingerprint-biometric-systems

  22. Pedersen PE (1997) Validating a neural network application: the case of financial diagnosis. J Comput Hum Behav 13(4):505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prechelt L (1994) A set of neural network benchmark problems and benchmarking rules. Technical Report 21, Fakultätfür InformatikUniversität Karlsruhe, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

  24. Ripley BD, Reipley RM (2006) Neural networks as statistical methods in survival analysis. J Stat 56:409–456

    Google Scholar 

  25. Samani S, Jokar B (2007) Examining validity and reliability of brief form depression, anxiety and stress scale. J Soc Sci Hum Shiraz Univ 26(3):65–77 [In Persian]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stevens R, Ikeda J, Casillas A, Palacio-Cayetano J, Clyman S (1999) Artificial neural network-based performance assessments. J Comput Hum Behav 15(3–4):295–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Payame Noor University Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Somayeh Aghamohamadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayat, S., Farahani, H.A., Aghamohamadi, M. et al. A comparison of artificial neural networks learning algorithms in predicting tendency for suicide. Neural Comput & Applic 23, 1381–1386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1086-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1086-z

Keywords

Navigation