A Chilean seismic regionalization through a Kohonen neural network

Abstract

Through this paper we are presenting a study of seismic regionalization for continental Chile based on a neural network. A scenario with six seismic regions is obtained, irrespective of the size of the neighborhood or the range of the correlation between the cells of the grid. Unlike conventional seismic methods, our work manages to generate seismic regions tectonically valid from sparse and non-redundant information, which shows that the self-organizing maps are a valuable tool in seismology. The high correlation between the spatial distribution of the seismic zones and geological data confirms that the fields chosen for structuring the training vectors were the most appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Gorshkov GP (1956) General survey of seismicity of the territory of the USSR. Public Bureau Central Seismologique International A19:25

  2. 2.

    Richter CF (1959) Seismic regionalization. BSSA 49:123

  3. 3.

    Gajardo E, Lomnitz C (1958) Seismic province of Chile. Publication 11:1529

  4. 4.

    Welkner P (1964) Estudio de la Sismicidad en Chile y su aplicacion al calculo antisismico. Thesis, Geophysics Department, University of Chile

  5. 5.

    Labbe JC (1976) Relaciones macrosismicas para la evaluacion del riesgo sismico en Chile y California

  6. 6.

    Barrientos SE (1980) Regionalizacion Sismica de Chile. M.Sc. Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Chile

  7. 7.

    Cornell C (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Seism Soc Am Bull 58:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Algermissen ST, Perkins DM (1976) A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguos United States. Geolog Surv Op.-File Rep 76–416

  9. 9.

    Martin A (1990) Hacia una regionalizacion y calculo del peligro sismico de Chile. Engineering Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Chile

  10. 10.

    Kahraman S, Baran T et al (2008) The effect of regional borders when using the Gutenberg-Richter model, case study: Western Anatolia. Pure Appl Geophys 165:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kohonen T (1990) The self-organizing map. Proc IEEE 78(9):1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rojas R (1996) Neural networks—a systematic introduction. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Delacou B, Sue C et al (2008) Quantification of strain rate in the Western Alps using geodesy: comparisons with seismotectonics. Swiss J Geosci 101:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pedone R, Lombardo P et al (1992) Seismotectonic regionalization of the Red Sea area and its application to seismic risk analysis. Nat Hazards 5:233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dowla FU, Taylor SR, Anderson RW (1990) Seismic discrimination with artificial neural netwoks: preliminary results with regional spectral data. BSSA 80:1346

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang J, Teng T-L (1995) Artificial neural network-based seismic detector. BSSA 85:308

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kim W-Y, Aharonian V, Lerner-Lam AL, Richards PG (1997) Discrimination of earthquakes and explosions in southern Russia using regional high-frequency three-component data from IRIS/JSP caucasus network. BSSA 87:569

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Giacinto G, Paolucci R, Roli F (1997) Application of neural networks and statistical pattern recognition algorithms to earthquake risk evaluation. Pattern Recogn Lett 18:1353

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kerh T, Gunaratnam D, Chan Y (2009) Neural computing with genetic algorithm in evaluating potentially hazardous metropolitan areas result from earthquake. Neural Comput Appl. doi:10.1007/s00521-009-0301-z

  20. 20.

    Kerh T, Lai JS, Chan Y (2007) Application of neural network in evaluating seismic design parameters for metropolitan areas in Taiwan. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced information technologies 052:01–06

  21. 21.

    Pu Y, Mesbahi E (2006) Application of artificial neural networks to evaluation of ultimate strength of steel panels. Eng Struct 28:1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kerh T, Lai JS, Gunaratnam D, Saunders R (2008) Evaluation of seismic design values in the Taiwan building code by using artificial neural network. CMES-Comput Model Eng Sci 26(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    CERESIS Catalog (1985) Catalogo de terremotos para America del Sur

  24. 24.

    USGS. Web site: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/

  25. 25.

    Tutorial. Web page: http://www.ai-junkie.com/ann/som/som1.html

  26. 26.

    Yin H (2007) Learning nonlinear principal manifolds by self-organising maps. In: Gorban AN et al (eds) LNCSE 58. Springer, Berlin

Download references

Acknowledgments

JR wants to thank TGT for the support through grant number 2122 and 2123. VHC wants to thank Rafael Valdivia for useful discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor H. Cárdenas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyes, J., Cárdenas, V.H. A Chilean seismic regionalization through a Kohonen neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 19, 1081–1087 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0373-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Seismic regionalization
  • Earthquake hazard
  • Seismic risk
  • Neural network
  • Kohonen self-organizing map