Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Federal Funds rates: a comparison of four methodologies

  • IJCNN 2007
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monthly Federal Fund interest rate values, set by the Federal Open Market Committee, have been the subject of much speculation prior to the announcement of their new values each period. In this study we use four competing methodologies to model and forecast the behavior of these short term Federal Fund interest rates. These methodologies are: time series, Taylor, econometric and neural network. The time series forecasts use only past values of Federal Funds rates. The celebrated Taylor rule methodology theorizes that the Federal Fund rate values are influenced solely by deviations from a desired level of inflation and from potential output. The econometric and neural network models have inputs used by both the time series and Taylor rule. Using monthly data from 1958 to the end of 2005 we distinguish between sample and out-of-sample sets to train, evaluate, and compare the models’ effectiveness. Our results indicate that the econometric modeling performs better than the other approaches when the data are divided into two sets of pre-Greenspan and Greenspan periods. However, when the data sample is divided into three groups of low, medium and high Federal Funds, the neural network approach does best.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernanke B (2007) Opening remarks to the conference on John Taylor’s contributions to monetary theory and policy. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Dallas, October 12, 2007

  2. Brenner RJ, Harjes RH, Kroner KF (1996) Another look at models of the short-term interest rate. J Financ Quant Anal 31:85–107. doi:10.2307/2331388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarida R, Galí J, Gertler M (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. Q J Econ 115:147–180. doi:10.1162/003355300554692

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez A, Nikotsko-Rzhevskyy A (2007) Measuring the Taylor rule’s performance. Fed Reserve Bank Dallas Econ Lett 2:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guidolin M, Timmermann A (2005) Forecasts of US short-term interest rates: a flexible forecast combination approach. Working paper 2005-059A, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

  6. Judd JP, Rudebusch GD (1998) Taylor’s rule and the fed: 1970–1997. Fed Reserve Bank San Franscisco Econ Rev 3:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. KDNuggets (2007), http://www.kdnuggets.com/polls/2007/data_mining_software_tools.htm

  8. Kozicki S (1999) How useful are Taylor rules for monetary policy? Fed Reserve Bank Kans City Econ Rev 84:5–33

    Google Scholar 

  9. McNelis P (2003) Neural networks in finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  10. Mehra Y, Minton B (2007) A Taylor rule and the Greenspan era. Fed Reserve Bank Richmond Econ Q 93:229–250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orphanides A (2001) Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. Am Econ Rev 91:964–985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orphanides A (2001b) Monetary policy rules, macroeconomic stability and inflation: a view from the trenches. Working paper no. 115, European Central Bank, December, pp 1–43

  13. Russell S, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence, a modern approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  14. Svensson L (2003) What is wrong with Taylor rules? Using judgment in monetary policy through targeting rules. J Econ Lit 41:426–477. doi:10.1257/002205103765762734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor JB (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39:195–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor JB (1998) An historical analysis of monetary policy rules. Working paper no. 6768, National Bureau of Economic Research, October, pp 1–53

  17. Tetlow R, Ironside B (2006) Real-time model uncertainty in the united states: the Fed model from 1996–2003, European Central Bank Working paper Series, No. 610

  18. Trippi R, Turban E (1996) Neural networks in finance and investing, Irwin Professional Publishing

  19. Woodford M (2000) The Taylor rule and optimal monetary policy. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 91:232–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Malliaris.

Additional information

An earlier version was presented at the 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks in Orlando. We are thankful to the Larry Medsker, regional editor of Neural Computing and Applications, and to two anonymous referees for very insightful comments that helped us improve the final version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malliaris, A.G., Malliaris, M. Modeling Federal Funds rates: a comparison of four methodologies. Neural Comput & Applic 18, 37–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-008-0198-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-008-0198-y

Keywords

Navigation