Neural Computing & Applications

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 282–289 | Cite as

Information Retrieval and Categorisation using a Cell Assembly Network

Original Article


Simulated networks of spiking leaky integrators are used to categorise and for Information Retrieval (IR). Neurons in the network are sparsely connected, learn using Hebbian learning rules, and are simulated in discrete time steps. Our earlier work has used these models to simulate human concept formation and usage, but we were interested in the model’s applicability to real world problems, so we have done experiments on categorisation and IR. The results of the system show that congresspeople are correctly categorised 89% of the time. The IR systems have 40% average precision on the Time collection, and 28% on the Cranfield 1,400. All scores are comparable to the state of the art results on these tasks.


Information retrieval Categorisation Neural network Cell assembly Hebbian learning 


  1. 1.
    Blake C, Merz C (1998) UCI Repository of machine learning databases Irvine, CA. University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science
  2. 2.
    Bratenberg V (1989) Some arguments for a theory of cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In: Nadel, Cooper, Culicover, Harnish (eds) Neural Connections, Mental computation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crouch C (1988) A cluster-based approach to thesaurus construction. In: ACM SIGIR, Grenoble, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deerwester S, Dumais S, Furnas G, Landauer T, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inform Sci 41(6):1–13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dumais S (1991) Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behav Res Meth, Instrum Comput 23(2):229–236Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hetherington P, Shapiro M (1993) Simulating Hebb cell assemblies: the necessity for partitioned dendritic trees and a post-net-pre LTD rule. Network: Comput Neur Syst 4:135–153Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huyck C (2002) Overlapping cell assemblies from correlators. Neurocomputing LettersGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huyck C (2002) Cell assemblies and neural network theory: from correlators to cell assemblies. Middlesex University technical report ISSN 1462-0871 CS-02-02Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ivancich JE, Huyck C, Kaplan S (1999) Cell assemblies as building blocks of larger cognitive structures. In: Behaviour and brain science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lesk ME (1969) Word-word associations in document retrieval. Am Document 20(2):119–148Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Porter M (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3):130–137Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sakurai Y (1998) The search for cell assemblies in the working brain. Behav Brain Res 91:1–13Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schlimmer J (1987) Concept acquisition through representational adjustment. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA. As reported by [15].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    SMART English stoplist (2003)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science, Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations