Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU for Cyclophosphamide-associated cardiac toxicity: a retrospective cohort

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the management and outcome of critically-ill patients with Cyclophosphamide (CY)-associated cardiac toxicity.

Methods

All patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) of the Nantes and Rennes University Hospitals for a CY-associated cardiac toxicity between January 2015 and December 2020 were included.

Results

Of the thirty-four patients included in the study, twenty-four (70%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), four (12%) autologous HSCT, and six (18%) chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. Acute pulmonary edema (65%), cardiac arrest (9%), and cardiac arrhythmia (6%) were the most common reasons for ICU admission. Patients were admitted to the ICU 6.5 (4-12) days after the intravenous administration of a median dose of CY of 100 [60-101] mg/Kg. Echocardiographic findings showed moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (69%) and pericardial effusion (52%). Eighteen (53%) patients ultimately developed cardiogenic shock and required vasopressors (47%) and/or inotropes (18%). Invasive mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy were required in twenty (59%) and five (14%) patients, respectively. Sixteen (47%) patients died of whom 12 (35.3%) died from refractory cardiogenic shock. The left ventricular ejection fraction improved over time in most survivors with a median time until full recovery of 33 (12-62) days. Two (11%) patients had a persistent left ventricular dysfunction at 6 months.

Conclusion

Refractory cardiogenic shock is the primary cause of death of patients with severe CY-related cardiotoxicity. Nonetheless, the cardiac function of most survivors recovered within a month.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones DS, Podolsky SH, Greene JA (2012) The Burden of Disease and the Changing Task of Medicine. N Engl J Med 366:2333–2338. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1113569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F et al (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer 127:2893–2917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dizon DS, Krilov L, Cohen E et al (2016) Clinical Cancer Advances 2016: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 34:987–1011. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.8427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Récher C, Coiffier B, Haioun C et al (2011) Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 378:1858–1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61040-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baili P, Di Salvo F, Marcos-Gragera R et al (2015) Age and case mix-standardised survival for all cancer patients in Europe 1999–2007: Results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 51:2120–2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zampieri FG, Romano TG, Salluh JIF et al (2021) Trends in clinical profiles, organ support use and outcomes of patients with cancer requiring unplanned ICU admission: a multicenter cohort study. Intensive Care Med 47:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06184-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreyro BL, Scales DC, Wunsch H et al (2021) Critical illness in patients with hematologic malignancy: a population-based cohort study. Intensive Care Med 47:1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06502-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D et al (2016) 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:2768–2801. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos GW, Sensenbrenner LL, Burke PJ et al (1972) The use of cyclophosphamide for clinical marrow transplantation. Transplant Proc 4:559–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurauchi K, Nishikawa T, Miyahara E et al (2017) Role of metabolites of cyclophosphamide in cardiotoxicity. BMC Res Notes 10:406. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2726-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Moghe A, Ghare S, Lamoreau B et al (2015) Molecular Mechanisms of Acrolein Toxicity: Relevance to Human Disease. Toxicol Sci 143:242–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfu233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishikawa T, Miyahara E, Kurauchi K et al (2015) Mechanisms of Fatal Cardiotoxicity following High-Dose Cyclophosphamide Therapy and a Method for Its Prevention. PLoS One 10:e0131394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottdiener JS, Appelbaum FR, Ferrans VJ et al (1981) Cardiotoxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy. Arch Intern Med 141:758–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg MA, Antin JH, Guinan EC, Rappeport JM (1986) Cyclophosphamide cardiotoxicity: an analysis of dosing as a risk factor. Blood 68:1114–1118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katayama M, Imai Y, Hashimoto H et al (2009) Fulminant fatal cardiotoxicity following cyclophosphamide therapy. J Cardiol 54:330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cazin B, Gorin NC, Laporte JP et al (1986) Cardiac complications after bone marrow transplantation. A report on a series of 63 consecutive transplantations. Cancer 57:2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860515)57:10<2061::AID-CNCR2820571031>3.0.CO;2-H

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duléry R, Mohty R, Labopin M et al (2021) Early Cardiac Toxicity Associated With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. JACC: CardioOncology 3:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.02.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishida S, Doki N, Shingai N et al (2016) The clinical features of fatal cyclophosphamide-induced cardiotoxicity in a conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Ann Hematol 95:1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2654-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Appelbaum F, Strauchen JA, Graw RG et al (1976) Acute lethal carditis caused by high-dose combination chemotherapy. A unique clinical and pathological entity. Lancet 1:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90151-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pai VB, Nahata MC (2000) Cardiotoxicity of Chemotherapeutic Agents: Incidence, Treatment and Prevention. Drug Safety 22:263–302. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200022040-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeh ETH, Bickford CL (2009) Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:2231–2247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mills BA, Roberts RW (1979) Cyclophosphamide-induced cardiomyopathy. A report of two cases and review of the english literature. Cancer 43:2223–2226. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197906)43:6<2223::AID-CNCR2820430610>3.0.CO;2-Y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ et al (2008) HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14:641–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kamphuis JAM, Linschoten M, Cramer MJ et al (2019) Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction of Nonanthracycline Chemotherapeutics. JACC: CardioOncology 1:280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.09.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Morandi P, Ruffini PA, Benvenuto GM et al (2005) Cardiac toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 35:323–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blazoski C, Kirupaharan P, Hilton R et al (2023) Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in immunosuppressed vs Immunocompetent patients. Heart Lung 58:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt M, Schellongowski P, Patroniti N et al (2018) Six-Month Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rescued by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197:1297–1307. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201708-1761OC

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wohlfarth P, Ullrich R, Staudinger T et al (2014) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and severe acute respiratory failure. Crit Care 18:R20. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13701

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Julien Cadiet for helping in data collection.

Financial support

None.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AV was the principal investigator and takes primary responsibility for the paper. JMT, TLT, JNT, CT, FR, RH, AS, JR, JBL, recruited the patients. AV, VG and JL did the statistical analysis. AV, JL and EC co-ordinated the research and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Canet.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the French Intensive Care Society (CE SRLF 22-058) on December 18, 2022.

Consent to participate

In accordance with French law on retrospective studies of anonymized healthcare data, informed consent was not required.

Competing interests

EC has received lecturer and conference-speaker fees, as well as reimbursements of travel and accommodation expenses related to attending scientific meetings, from Gilead, Shionogi, and Sanofi-Genzyme. JBL has received lecturer and conference-speaker fees from BD and Zoll. RH reports honoraria from Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Takeda and Roche; and consultancy at Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte, Miltenyi. None of the other authors have relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vennier, A., Canet, E., Guardiolle, V. et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU for Cyclophosphamide-associated cardiac toxicity: a retrospective cohort. Support Care Cancer 31, 474 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07951-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07951-9

Keywords

Navigation