Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic disparities in psychosocial service recommendation and receipt among young Black breast cancer survivors

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Black cancer survivors are less likely to receive desired psychological services than non-Hispanic White survivors. Black cancer survivors with low socioeconomic status may face additional barriers to receipt of psychological services. This study examined socioeconomic disparities in psychological service recommendation, attempts to access, and receipt among Black breast cancer (BC) survivors.

Methods

Black BC survivors (n = 249) completed surveys at baseline (T1) and follow-up (T2; M 1.6 years post-T1). At T1, participants reported socioeconomic characteristics (employment, income, insurance, and education) and psychological symptoms (hospital anxiety and depression scale [HADS]). Self-reported address was used to identify area deprivation index (ADI), a composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage (least disadvantaged = 1; most disadvantaged = 10). At T2, participants reported provider recommendations for, attempts to access, and receipt of psychological services. Logistic regressions examined relationships between socioeconomic characteristics and psychological service variables, controlling for baseline psychological symptoms.

Results

In multivariable analyses, being employed was associated with a lower likelihood of attempts to access (OR = 0.25) and receipt of (OR = 0.37) psychological services, above and beyond the effect of psychological symptoms. Univariate analyses demonstrated that participants from more disadvantaged areas (i.e., higher ADI) were more likely to receive psychological services (OR = 1.20), but this effect became non-significant in multivariable analyses.

Conclusion

Results highlight the importance of an intersectional perspective in considering mental health care disparities; both race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status should be incorporated when considering barriers and facilitators of psychological care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the terms under which participants provided informed consent. Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Carlson LE et al (2019) Prevalence of psychosocial distress in cancer patients across 55 North American cancer centers. J Psychosoc Oncol 37(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Forsythe LP et al (2013) Receipt of psychosocial care among cancer survivors in the United States. J Clin Oncol 31(16):1961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Traeger L et al (2014) Race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use among non-Hispanic Black and White patients with lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(2):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. King CJ et al (2015) Decomposing differences in medical care access among cancer survivors by race and ethnicity. Am J Med Qual 30(5):459–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pal T et al (2015) A high frequency of BRCA mutations in young Black women with breast cancer residing in Florida. Cancer 121(23):4173–4180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonner D et al (2016) Recruitment of a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer through a state cancer registry. Breast J 22(2):166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh GK (2003) Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969–1998. Am J Public Health 93(7):1137–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kind AJ et al (2014) Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30 day rehospitalizations: an analysis of Medicare data. Ann Intern Med 161(11):765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kind AJ, Buckingham WR (2018) Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible—the neighborhood atlas. N Engl J Med 378(26):2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peduzzi P et al (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49(12):1373–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riba MB, et al (2019) Distress management, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 17(10): 1229–1249

  13. Fukuda Y, Hiyoshi A (2012) Influences of income and employment on psychological distress and depression treatment in Japanese adults. Environ Health Prev Med 17(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buffel V, Van de Straat V, Bracke P (2015) Employment status and mental health care use in times of economic contraction: a repeated cross-sectional study in Europe, using a three-level model. Int J Equity Health 14(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Erim DO et al (2019) Patterns and predictors of self-reported clinical diagnosis and treatment for depression in prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Med 8(8):3648–3658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva M, Loureiro A, Cardoso G (2016) Social determinants of mental health: a review of the evidence. Eur J Psychiatry 30(4):259–292

    Google Scholar 

  17. Damaskos P et al (2018) Intersectionality and the LGBT cancer patient. Semin Oncol Nurs 34(1):30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyon ME et al (2021) The intersectionality of gender and poverty on symptom suffering among adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 68(8):e29144

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the American Cancer Society (RSG-11–268-01-CPPB), Florida Biomedical Research Program (IBG10-34199), and National Cancer Institute (P30CA076292; T32CA090314).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Claire C. Conley: formal analysis, interpretation, visualization, writing—original draft; McKenzie McIntyre: data curation, and writing—review and editing; Stephanie Dekkers: data curation and writing—review and editing; Tuya Pal: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, supervision, and writing—review and editing; Susan T. Vadaparampil: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, supervision, and writing–review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan T. Vadaparampil.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Study procedures adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures were approved by the University of South Florida (104559) and the Florida Department of Health (DOH H11168) Institutional Review Boards.

Consent to participate

Verbal or written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conley, C.C., McIntyre, M., Dekkers, S. et al. Socioeconomic disparities in psychosocial service recommendation and receipt among young Black breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 30, 5557–5560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06884-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06884-z

Keywords

Navigation