Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Childhood leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors lack knowledge about their past disease and possible late effects. I-BFM ELTEC study with Chilean and Croatian participation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Late effects in childhood cancer survivors are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The objective was to establish knowledge about the disease, late effects, self-care practices, application of health knowledge/education, sources of information, and biopsychosocial impact of cancer, and compare the results of Chile and Croatia.

Methods

One-hundred-and-seventy-one, 5-year survivors who were treated for leukemia or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma responded to a questionnaire (119 in Chile and 52 in Croatia). The questionnaire was reviewed by BFM-ELTEC.

Results

Health knowledge about past diagnosis and general treatment had 96% Chilean and 85% Croatian survivors. Ninety percent of Chilean and 73% of Croatian survivors were unaware of possible late effects, and half did not know which specialist to visit for follow-up. Forty-six percent of Chilean and 35% of Croatian survivors knew about healthy lifestyles, but most did not practice them. The 74% of Chileans and 87% of Croatian survivors recalled having received health education during treatment. About 50% of survivors in both groups were afraid or anguish, but it was also a growth experience for 60% of Chilean and 42% of Croatian survivors. Eighty-seven percent Chilean and 77% Croatian survivors considered themselves physically independent, while 76% and 75% felt psychologically independent, respectively.

Conclusion

A significant lack of knowledge about the specific treatment, late effects, and future health in both countries was detected. They did not achieve significant learning with the education received. Psychological sequelae were found that are important to prevent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

The research data are available in a database and we also have the surveys of each patient for review.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PINDA:

Chilean collaborative pediatric oncology group

I-BFM:

International German Berlin, Frankfurt, Muenster Group

BFM-ELTEC:

Early and Late Toxicity Education Committee of BFM Study Group

AYAS:

Adolescents and young adults

SEPHO:

Croatian Group

ALL-AML:

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia

NHL:

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

NEETs:

Not in education, employment or training

CT:

Chemotherapy

RT:

Radiotherapy

SX:

Surgery

M:

Male

F:

Female

NR:

Did not respond

NS:

Not significant

References

  1. Bhakta N, Liu Q, Ness KK et al (2017) The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). Lancet 390:2569–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Landier W, Wallace WHB, Hudson MM (2006) Long-term follow-up of pediatric cancer survivors: education, surveillance, and screening. Pediatr Blood Cancer 46:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines (2018) www.survivorshipguidelines.org Version 5.0. Accessed April 2, 2021

  4. International guideline Harmonization Group for Late Effect of Childhood Cancer. https://www.ighg.org. Accessed April 2, 2021.

  5. Reppucci ML, Schleien CL (2017) Fish JD Looking for trouble: adherence to late-effects surveillance among childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Primer informe de registro nacional de cancer infantil de Chile, menores de 15 años, RENCI.http://www.ipsuss.cl/ipsuss/site/artic/20180117/asocfile/20180117150429/informe_renci_2007_2011registro_nacional_c__ncer_infantildepto_epidemiolog__aminsal2018.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2021

  7. Roganović J (2009) Epidemiologij a malignih bolesti u djece. Pedij atrij a danas 5:12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guías de prevención y seguimiento de sobrevivientes de cáncer infantil PINDA 0314. https://www.fnh.cl/publicaciones/GUIASOBREVIVIENTESCANCERINFANTIL.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2021

  9. Likert Scale Definition, Examples and Analysis. https://www.simplypsychology.org. Accessed 2 April 2021

  10. American Academy of Pediatrics (2009) Long-term follow-up care for pediatric cancer survivors. Pediatrics 123:906–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Byrne J, Lewis S, Halamek L, Connelly R, Mulvihill J (1989) Childhood cancer survivors’ knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med 110:400–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadan-Lottick NS, Robison LL, Gurney JG et al (2002) Childhood cancer survivors’ knowledge of their past diagnosis and treatment: childhood cancer survivor study. JAMA 287:1832–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Syed IA, Klassen AF, Barr R et al (2016) Factors associated with childhood cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis, treatment, and risk for late effects. J Cancer Surviv 10:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arroyave WD, Clipp EC, Miller PE et al (2008) Childhood cancer survivors’ perceived barriers to improving exercise and dietary behaviors. Oncol Nurs Forum 35:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen JE, Wakefield CE, Cohn RJ (2016) Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD009678

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson T, Mostoufi-Moab S, Stratton K et al (2018) Temporal patterns in the risk of chronic health conditions in survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed 1970–1999: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol 19(12):1590–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schindera C, Weiss A, Hagenbuch N et al (2020) Physical activity and screen time in children who survived cancer: a report from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 67:e28046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kesting SV, Gotte M, Seidel CC, Rosenbaum D, Boos J (2016) One in four questioned children faces problems regarding reintegration into physical education at school after treatment for pediatric cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:737–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Programa nacional del cáncer. www.pindachile.cl. Accessed 2 May 2021

  20. Golchin M, Sharifi N, Ziaee S, Taheri P (2011) The effect of self-care on the lives of children suffering from acute lymphocytic leukemia. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 16:71–78

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kagramanov D, Sutradhar R, Lau C et al (2021) Impact of the model of long-term follow-up care on adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers. Cancer Med 10:5078–5087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daly A, Lewis RW, Vangile K et al (2019) Survivor clinic attendance among pediatric- and adolescent-aged survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 13:56–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cherven B, Mertens A, Meacham LR, Williamson R, Boring C, Wasilewski-Masker K (2014) Knowledge and risk perception of late effects among childhood cancer survivors and parents before and after visiting a childhood cancer survivor clinic. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 31:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Puigdellivol I. La educación especial en la escuela integrada: una perspectiva desde la diversidad/. Barcelona Editorial Graó 2007; 7ª ed.

  25. Rodríguez M (2011) La teoría del aprendizaje significativo: una revisión aplicable a la escuela actual. Revista Electrònica d’Investigació i Innovació Educativa i Socioeducativa. 3(1):29–50

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yépez M (2011) Aproximación a la comprensión del aprendizaje significativo de David Ausube. Revista Ciencias de la Educación. Primera Etapa 21:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ortega JJ, Sánchez D, Rodríguez ÓA, Ortega JM (2018) Adherencia terapéutica: un problema de atención médica. Acta Med 16:226–232

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reyes E, Trejo R, Arguijo S et al (2016) Therapeutic adherence: concepts, determinants and new strategies. Biblioteca Virtual en Salud Honduras 84(3–4):125–132

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brown M, Sharp L, Sniehotta F, Skinner R, Araújo-Soares V (2020) The development of health behaviour change interventions for childhood cancer survivors: The need for a behavioural science approach. Pediatr Blood Cancer. e28500

  30. Stinson JN, White M, Breakey V et al (2011) Perspectives on quality and content of information on the internet for adolescents with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 57:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Grace J, Schweers L, Anazodo A, Freyer D (2019) Evaluating and providing quality health information for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66:e27931

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. -Bizarro W, Sucari W, Quispe-Coaquira A (2019) Evaluación formativa en el marco del enfoque por competencia. Revista Innova Educación (1); 374–390. https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rie.2019.03.r001

  33. Zeltzer LK, Recklitis C, Buchbinder D et al (2009) Psychological status in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 27:2396–2404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brinkman T, Recklitis C, Michel G, Grootenhuis M, Klosky J (2018) Psychological symptoms, social outcomes, socioeconomic attainment, and health behaviors among survivors of childhood cancer: current state of the literature. J Clin Oncol 36:2190–2197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bitsko M, Cohen D, Dillon R, Harvey J, Krull K, Klosky J (2016) Psychosocial late effects in pediatric cancer survivors: a report from the children’s oncology group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ljungman L, Cernvall M, Grönqvist H, Ljótsson B, Ljungman G, Von Essen L (2014) Long-term positive and negative psychological late effects for parents of childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9:e103340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Morhun JM, Racine NM, Guilcher GMT, Tomfohr-Madsen LM, Schulte FSM (2020) Health-related quality of life and well-being in parents of infants and toddlers with cancer. Curr Oncol 27(2):e206–e215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Friend A, Feltbower R, Hughes E, Dye K, Glaser AW (2018) Mental health of long-term survivors of childhood and young adult cancer: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 143:1279–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nathan PC, Nachman A, Sutradhar R et al (2018) Adverse mental health outcomes in a population-based cohort of survivors of childhood cancer. Cancer 124:2045–2057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all collaborators in the Chilean (PINDA) network: María Soledad Fernández, Magdalena Fernández, Laura Neira, Maite Rosas, Verónica Oyarce, Paulina Fuentes, Tamara Inostroza, Nuri Moliné, Marcela Venega and Rodrigo Donoso; all of them contributed to obtaining informed consent, applying the questionnaire, and collecting data. As well as, thanks to collaborators Lucija Ruzman and Ernest Bilic from the Croatian Group (SEPHO), who also contributed to obtaining informed consent, applying the questionnaire, and collecting data and Julie Byrne to review this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ana Becker: designed the clinical survey, coordinated the collaboration between cohorts of Chile and Croatia, worked on getting the approval by the ethics committee in Chile, s, designed the survey t, distributed the survey, collected and analysis the data from the survey, and wrote and edited the manuscript.

Claudia Paris: She has worked in the clinical design and approval by the ethics committee in Chile, coordination of the collaboration between cohorts of different countries, distribution of the survey, collection of data and analysis all throughout Chile, analysis of the data collected from both countries and writing and editing the manuscript that summarizes the main findings.

Jelena Roganovic: She has worked on the coordination of the collaboration between cohorts of different countries, distribution of the survey, collection of data and analysis all through Croatia, and writing and editing the manuscript and abstract that summarizes the main findings.

Cristina Bustos: She has worked in the clinical design of the project, distribution of the survey, collection of data and analysis in that hospital and editing the manuscript that summarizes the main findings.

Amaia Rosas: She has worked in the clinical design of the project, she was responsible for the psychological aspect of the project, distribution of the survey, collection of psychological data and analysis. Also participated in editing the manuscript that summarizes the main findings.

Paula Contreras: She has worked in the clinical design of the project, distribution of the survey, collection of data and analysis, as well as in the interpretation of data and final review of the manuscript.

Ana Zepeda: She worked in analysis and interpretation of data. She performed all the statistical analysis, tables and graphs and revision of the manuscript.

Edit Bardi: She has worked in design of the project, coordination of the collaboration between cohorts of different countries, stimulated international collaboration, editing the manuscript that summarizes the main findings, as well as interpretation of data and drafting and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Becker.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the different participating centers. Informed consent was requested from each patient before enrolling them in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors, collaborators, and patients agree to the publication of this article in this journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becker, A., Paris, C., Roganovic, J. et al. Childhood leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors lack knowledge about their past disease and possible late effects. I-BFM ELTEC study with Chilean and Croatian participation. Support Care Cancer 30, 3839–3847 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06741-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06741-5

Keywords

Navigation