Skip to main content

Relationships between health literacy, having a cancer care coordinator, and long-term health-related quality of life among cancer survivors

Supportive Care in Cancer volume 29, pages 7913–7924 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Care coordination is a strategy to reduce healthcare navigation challenges for cancer patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the association between having a cancer care coordinator (CCC) and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and to evaluate whether this association differed by level of health literacy.

Methods

A population-based sample of survivors diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer in 2015 from the Iowa Cancer Registry participated in an online survey conducted in 2017–2018 (N = 368). Chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used to model the association between patient characteristics and having a cancer care coordinator. Linear regression was used to model the association between patient perception of having a cancer care coordinator and post-treatment physical or mental HRQoL by differing levels of health literacy while controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Results

Most survivors (81%) reported having one healthcare professional who coordinated their cancer care. Overall, patient perception of having a coordinator was not significantly associated with physical HRQoL (p = 0.118). However, participants with low health literacy (21%) who had a coordinator had significantly higher physical HRQoL scores compared to those who did not (adjusted mean difference 5.2, p = 0.010), while not so for medium (29%) or high (51%) health literacy (p = 0.227, and p = 0.850, respectively; test for interaction p = 0.001). Mental HRQoL was not associated with having a coordinator in our analyses.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that care coordinators improved post-treatment physical HRQoL, particularly for participants with low health literacy. Care coordinators may be beneficial to the most vulnerable patients struggling to navigate the complex healthcare system during cancer treatment. Future research should focus on the mechanisms by which care coordination may affect post-treatment HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Data availability

Our data are not deposited in publicly available repositories. However, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

The code used for analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in, A, in Crossing the Quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. 2001, National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.: Washington (DC).

  2. McDonald, KM, Sundaram, V, Bravata, DM, Lewis, R, Lin, N, Kraft, SA, McKinnon, M, Paguntalan, H, and Owens, DK (2007). In Closing the quality gap: a critical analysis of quality improvement strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination). Rockville (MD).

  3. Mora-Pinzon MC, Chrischilles EA, Greenlee RT, Hoeth L, Hampton JM, Smith MA, McDowell BD, Wilke LG, Trentham-Dietz A (2019) Variation in coordination of care reported by breast cancer patients according to health literacy. Support Care Cancer 273:857–865

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M (2010) Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 332:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baik SH, Gallo LC, Wells KJ (2016) Patient navigation in breast cancer treatment and survivorship: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 3430:3686–3696

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorin SS, Haggstrom D, Han PKJ, Fairfield KM, Krebs P, Clauser SB (2017) Cancer care coordination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30 years of empirical studies. Ann Behav Med 514:532–546

    Google Scholar 

  7. McDowell BD, Klemp J, Blaes A, Cohee AA, Trentham-Dietz A, Kamaraju S, Otte JL, Mott SL, Chrischilles EA (2020) The association between cancer care coordination and quality of life is stronger for breast cancer patients with lower health literacy: a Greater Plains Collaborative study. Support Care Cancer 282:887–895

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bederman SS, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, McIsaac WJ, Coyte PC, Wright JG (2010) In the eye of the beholder: preferences of patients, family physicians, and surgeons for lumbar spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(1):108–115

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collins LK, Goodwin JA, Spencer HJ, Guevara C, Ferrell B, McSweeney J, Badgwell BD (2013) Patient reasoning in palliative surgical oncology. J Surg Oncol 1074:372–375

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gu NY, Wolf C, Leopold S, Manner PA, Doctor JN (2009) A comparison of physician and patient time trade-offs for postoperative hip outcomes. Value Health 124:618–620

    Google Scholar 

  11. Modi CS, Veillette CJH, Gandhi R, Perruccio AV, Rampersaud YR (2014) Factors that influence the choice to undergo surgery for shoulder and elbow conditions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 4723:883–891

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thrumurthy SG, Morris JJ, Mughal MM, Ward JB (2011) Discrete-choice preference comparison between patients and doctors for the surgical management of oesophagogastric cancer. Br J Surg 98(8):1124–1131 (discussion 1132)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yahanda AT, Lafaro KJ, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM (2016) A systematic review of the factors that patients use to choose their surgeon. World J Surg 401:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amalraj S, Starkweather C, Nguyen C, Naeim A (2009) Health literacy, communication, and treatment decision-making in older cancer patients. Oncology (Williston Park) 234:369–375

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett IM, Chen J, Soroui JS, White S (2009) The contribution of health literacy to disparities in self-rated health status and preventive health behaviors in older adults. Ann Fam Med 73:204–211

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K (2011) Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 1552:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP (2004) Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med 1912:1228–1239

    Google Scholar 

  18. Del Vecchio NJ, Askelson NM, Carter KD, Chrischilles A, Lynch CF, Charlton ME (2020) Patterns and characteristics of patients’ selection of cancer surgeons. Am J Surg 221(5):1033–1041

  19. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ (2004) Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med 368:588–594

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chew LD, Griffin JM, Partin MR, Noorbaloochi S, Grill JP, Snyder A, Bradley KA, Nugent SM, Baines AD, Vanryn M (2008) Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population. J Gen Intern Med 235:561–566

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halverson J, Martinez-Donate A, Trentham-Dietz A, Walsh MC, Strickland JS, Palta M, Smith PD, Cleary J (2013) Health literacy and urbanicity among cancer patients. J Rural Health 294:392–402

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawley, ST, Janz, NK, Lillie, SE, Friese, CR, Griggs, JJ, Graff, JJ, Hamilton, AS, Jain, S, and Katz, SJ. (2010) Perceptions of care coordination in a population-based sample of diverse breast cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns; 81 Suppl:S34–40.

  23. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R (2010) The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 6311:1179–1194

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D (2009) Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res 187:873–880

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hays RD, Spritzer KL, Schalet BD, Cella D (2018) PROMIS((R))-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores. Qual Life Res 27(7):1885–1891

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen RE, Potosky AL, Moinpour CM, Lobo T, Cella D, Hahn EA, Thissen D, Smith AW, Ahn J, Luta G, Reeve BB (2017) United States population-based estimates of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system symptom and functional status reference values for individuals with cancer. J Clin Oncol 3517:1913–1920

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen RE, Potosky AL, Reeve BB, Hahn E, Cella D, Fries J, Smith AW, Keegan TH, Wu XC, Paddock L, Moinpour CM (2015) Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2410:2333–2344

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quach CW, Langer MM, Chen RC, Thissen D, Usinger DS, Emerson MA, Reeve BB (2016) Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study. Qual Life Res 2511:2811–2823

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu H, Cella D, Gershon R, Shen J, Morales LS, Riley W, Hays RD (2010) Representativeness of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system internet panel. J Clin Epidemiol 6311:1169–1178

    Google Scholar 

  30. Swanholm, E, McDonald, W, Makris, U, Noe, C, and Gatchel, R. (2014) Estimates of minimally important differences (MIDs) for two patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) computer-adaptive tests in chronic pain patients. 194:217-232

  31. Yost KJ, Eton DT, Garcia SF, Cella D (2011) Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 645:507–516

    Google Scholar 

  32. Katz JN, Chang LC, Sangha O, Fossel AH, Bates DW (1996) Can comorbidity be measured by questionnaire rather than medical record review? Med Care 341:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN (2003) The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 492:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  34. University of Washington. Rural-Urban Community Area Codes (RUCAs). 2005; Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/. Accessed 2019 May 22

  35. Institute, NC. NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/research/nci-role/cancer-centers. Accessed 2019 May 15

  36. Institute of Medicine Committee on Health, L (2004) In Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion, L. Nielsen-Bohlman, A.M. Panzer, and D.A. Kindig, (eds) National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2004 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.: Washington (DC).

  37. Halverson JL, Martinez-Donate AP, Palta M, Leal T, Lubner S, Walsh MC, Schaaf Strickland J, Smith PD, Trentham-Dietz A (2015) Health literacy and health-related quality of life among a population-based sample of cancer patients. J Health Commun 2011:1320–1329

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keene Woods N, Chesser AK (2017) Validation of a single question health literacy screening tool for older adults. Gerontol Geriatr Med 3:2333721417713095

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Braun KL, Kagawa-Singer M, Holden AE, Burhansstipanov L, Tran JH, Seals BF, Corbie-Smith G, Tsark JU, Harjo L, Foo MA, Ramirez AG (2012) Cancer patient navigator tasks across the cancer care continuum. J Health Care Poor Underserved 231:398–413

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spahrkas SS, Looijmans A, Sanderman R, Hagedoorn M (2020) Beating cancer-related fatigue with the untire mobile app: protocol for a waiting list randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc 9(2):e15969

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Dominic NA, Thirunavuk Arasoo VJ, Botross NP, Riad A, Biding C, Ramadas A (2018) Changes in health- related quality of life and psychosocial well-being of breast cancer survivors: findings from a group- based intervention program in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 197:1809–1815

    Google Scholar 

  42. Medeiros EA, Castaneda SF, Gonzalez P, Rodriguez B, Buelna C, West D, Talavera GA (2015) Health-related quality of life among cancer survivors attending support groups. J Cancer Educ 303:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  43. National Cancer Policy, F, Roundtable on Health, L, Board on Health Care, S, Health, Medicine, D, National Academies of Sciences, E, and Medicine (2020) The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health, in Health Literacy and Communication Strategies in Oncology: Proceedings of a Workshop. National Academies Press (US). National Academy of Sciences.: Washington (DC).

  44. Ko NY, Darnell JS, Calhoun E, Freund KM, Wells KJ, Shapiro CL, Dudley DJ, Patierno SR, Fiscella K, Raich P, Battaglia TA (2014) Can patient navigation improve receipt of recommended breast cancer care? Evidence from the National Patient Navigation Research Program. J Clin Oncol 3225:2758–2764

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nickell A, Stewart SL, Burke NJ, Guerra C, Cohen E, Lawlor C, Colen S, Cheng J, Joseph G (2019) Engaging limited English proficient and ethnically diverse low-income women in health research: a randomized trial of a patient navigator intervention. Patient Educ Couns 1027:1313–1323

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fiscella K, Whitley E, Hendren S, Raich P, Humiston S, Winters P, Jean-Pierre P, Valverde P, Thorland W, Epstein R (2012) Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer treatment: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2110:1673–1681

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wildes KA, Miller AR, de Majors SS, Otto PM, Ramirez AG (2011) The satisfaction of Latina breast cancer survivors with their healthcare and health-related quality of life. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 207:1065–1074

    Google Scholar 

  48. Claridy MD, Ansa B, Damus F, Alema-Mensah E, Smith SA (2018) Health-related quality of life of African-American female breast cancer survivors, survivors of other cancers, and those without cancer. Qual Life Res 278:2067–2075

    Google Scholar 

  49. Penson DF, Stoddard ML, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP, Flanders SC, Litwin MS (2001) The association between socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 544:350–358

    Google Scholar 

  50. Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, Alfano CM, Rodriguez JL, Sabatino SA, HawkinsRowland NAJH (2012) Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(11):2108–2117

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported under TORFP 2016–07 (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Rapid Response Surveillance Study) HHSN261201300020I/HHSN26100014. This work was also supported by the University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, which is funded in part by NIH/ NCI P30 CA086862.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, 145 N. Riverside Drive, S465 CPHB, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

    Natalie J. Del Vecchio, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Charles F. Lynch & Mary E. Charlton

  2. Population Research Core, University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Bradley D. McDowell

  3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Knute D. Carter

  4. Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Natoshia M. Askelson

  5. Iowa Cancer Registry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA

    Charles F. Lynch & Mary E. Charlton

Authors
  1. Natalie J. Del Vecchio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bradley D. McDowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Knute D. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natoshia M. Askelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elizabeth Chrischilles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charles F. Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mary E. Charlton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have made (a) substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (c) final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie J. Del Vecchio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The questionnaire and research protocol were approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board, with a waiver of documentation of consent.

Consent to participate

Patients were provided a letter containing the elements of consent. Given that this was an online survey, a waiver of documentation of consent was obtained from our Institutional Review Board. Participants had to click on an 'Agree' button to consent and enroll in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Vecchio, N.J., McDowell, B.D., Carter, K.D. et al. Relationships between health literacy, having a cancer care coordinator, and long-term health-related quality of life among cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 29, 7913–7924 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06356-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06356-w

Keyword

  • Care coordination; Cancer care; Health literacy; Quality of life; Care coordinator; Patient navigator