Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of breast cancer–related outcomes with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: A literature review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) is a validated tool used in patients with varied cancer diagnoses to measure patient symptoms. The present manuscript will review the literature assessing the ability of the ESAS to predict patient-related outcomes in breast cancer patients.

Methods

A literature search was conducted of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase for English articles that investigated the use of predictive modelling with the ESAS in the breast cancer population. Study type, publication year, sample size, patient demographics, predicted outcomes, and strongest predictive factors/symptoms were summarized for each study.

Results

A total of nine articles were included in this review. Five articles used the ESAS in predictive models to determine patient time to death. ESAS was also used to predict emergency department visits, determine symptoms associated with decreased quality of life, and generate a Health Utility Score. Lack of appetite was the most common ESAS symptom, as it was reported in five studies to be associated with decreased survival. In four of the nine articles, an additional survey investigating physical functioning was used in combination with ESAS to strengthen the predictive models.

Conclusions

Included studies support the use of ESAS in predictive models, particularly for predicting survival. Using the ESAS as a predictive tool allows for more accurate time to death predictions, potentially improving symptom management and preventing overtreatment of palliative patients near the end of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hui D, Bruera E (2009) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 years later: past, present, and future developments. J Pain Symptom Manag 53:630–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow S, Wan BA, Pidduck W, Zhang L, DeAngelis C, Chan S, Yee C, Drost L, Leung E, Sousa P, Lewis D, Lam H, Chow R, Lock M, Chow E (2019) Symptoms predictive of overall quality of life using the Edmonton symptom assessment scale in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer 19:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamer J, McDonald R, Zhang L, Verma S, Leahey A, Ecclestone C, Bedard G, Pulenzas N, Bhatia A, Chow R, DeAngelis C, Ellis J, Rakovitch E, Lee J, Chow E (2017) Quality of life (QOL) and symptom burden (SB) in patients with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 25:409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow S, Wan BA, Pidduck W, Zhang L, DeAngelis C, Chan S, Yee C, Drost L, Leung E, Sousa P, Lewis D, Lam H, Chow R, Lock M, Chow E (2019) Symptom clusters in patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 42:14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ranapurwala SI, Cavanaugh JE, Young T, Wu H, Peek-Asa C, Ramirez MR (2019) Public health application of predictive modeling: an example from farm vehicle crashes. Inj Epidemiol 6:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieder C, Kämpe TA, Pawinski A, Dalhaug A (2018) Patient-reported symptoms before palliative radiotherapy predict survival differences. Strahlentherapie Und Onkol 194:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Budhwani S, Moineddin R, Wodchis WP, Zimmermann C, Howell D (2019) Do longitudinally collected symptom scores predict time to death in advanced breast cancer: a joint modeling analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag 59(5):1009–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lien K, Zeng L, Zhang L, Nguyen J, Di Giovanni J, Popovic M et al (2012) Predictive factors for well-being in advanced cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 24:443–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng L, Zhang L, Culleton S, Jon F, Holden L, Kwong J, Khan L, Tsao M, Danjoux C, Sahgal A, Barnes E, Chow E (2011) Edmonton symptom assessment scale as a prognosticative indicator in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med 14:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nieder C, Kampe TA (2018) Contribution of patient-reported symptoms before palliative radiotherapy to development of multivariable prognostic models. Anticancer Res 38:733–441

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barbera L, Atzema C, Sutradhar R, Seow H, Howell D, Husain A, Sussman J, Earle C, Liu Y, Dudgeon D (2013) Do patient-reported symptoms predict emergency department visits in cancer patients? A population-based analysis. Ann Emerg Med 61:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutradhar R, Rostami M, Barbera L (2019) Patient-reported symptoms improve performance of risk prediction models for emergency department visits among patients with cancer: a population-wide study in Ontario using administrative data. J Pain Symptom Manag 58:745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brant JM (2010) Palliative care for adults across the cancer trajectory: from diagnosis to end of life. Semin Oncol Nurs 26:222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barbera L, Sutradhar R, Howell D, Sussman J, Seow H, Dudgeon D, Atzema C, Earle C, Husain A, Liu Y, Krzyzanowska MK (2015) Does routine symptom screening with ESAS decrease ED visits in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy? Support Care Cancer 23:3025–3032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moskovitz M, Jao K, Su J, Brown MC, Naik H, Eng L et al (2019) Combined cancer patient–reported symptom and health utility tool for routine clinical implementation: a real-world comparison of the ESAS and EQ-5D in multiple cancer sites. Curr Oncol 26:733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiang C-L, Lo S-H, Agarwal A (2018) Prognostic factors for survival prediction in advanced cancer patients and development of a simple survival prediction tool for application in a community palliative care setting: a retrospective cohort study. J Pain Manag 11:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chow E, Abdolell M, Panzarella T, Harris K, Bezjak A, Warde P, Tannock I (2009) Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 73:1169–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ WV. (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 6.

  19. Western Australia: Government of Western Australia Department of Health. (2013) Understanding the dying process: an information booklet for families 1–7.

  20. Souter J (2005) Poetic approaches. Loss of appetite: a poetic exploration of cancer patients’ and their carers’ experiences. Int J Palliat Nurs 11:524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Razvi Y, Chan S, Zaki P, McKenzie E, Lam H, Van Der Velden JM et al (2018) Predicting survival of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy: a systematic review. Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care 3:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zinck HD (2009) ED Spending in Canada: a focus on the cost of patients waiting for access to an in-patient bed in Ontario. Healthc Q 12:25–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong ST, Costa DSJ, Butow PN, Lovell MR, Agar M, Velikova G, Teckle P, Tong A, Tebbutt NC, Clarke SJ, van der Hoek K, King MT, Fayers PM (2016) Symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients: an empirical omparison of statistical methods and the impact on quality of life. J Pain Symptom Manag 51:88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seow H, Sussman J, Martelli-Reid L, Pond G, Bainbridge D (2012) Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening. J Oncol Pract 8:142–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Chow.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Search terms

Appendix. Search terms

Database: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails databases <January 2020>

  1. 1.

    exp Breast Neoplasms/ (12522)

  2. 2.

    [(breast adj1 (cancer* or neoplasm* or carcinoma or tumor* or tumour*)).tw,kf.] (0)

  3. 3.

    or/1-2 (12522)

  4. 4.

    (Edmonton adj3 Symptom* adj3 (Assessment* or Scale*)).mp. (183)

  5. 5.

    3 and 4 (2)

  6. 6.

    limit 5 to english language (0)

Database: Ovid MEDLINE <1946 to February 12, 2020>

  1. 1.

    exp Breast Neoplasms/ (286537)

  2. 2.

    (breast adj1 (cancer* or neoplasm* or carcinoma or tumor* or tumour*)).tw,kf. (296495)

  3. 3.

    or/1-2 (370841)

  4. 4.

    (Edmonton adj3 Symptom* adj3 (Assessment* or Scale*)).mp. (713)

  5. 5.

    3 and 4 (38)

  6. 6.

    limit 5 to english language (38)

Database: Embase <1946 to 2020 Week 06>

  1. 1.

    exp breast cancer/ (462954)

  2. 2.

    (breast adj1 (cancer* or neoplasm* or carcinoma or tumor* or tumour*)).tw,kw. (429867)

  3. 3.

    or/1-2 (558112)

  4. 4

    (Edmonton adj3 Symptom* adj3 (Assessment* or Scale*)).mp. (1525)

  5. 5.

    3 and 4 (141)

  6. 6.

    limit 5 to english language (141)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Milton, L., Behroozian, T., Coburn, N. et al. Prediction of breast cancer–related outcomes with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: A literature review. Support Care Cancer 29, 595–603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05755-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05755-9

Keywords

Navigation