Abstract
Aim
The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of salivary biomarkers in breast cancer.
Materials and methods
A prospective study was carried out of 91 consecutive breast cancer patients and 60 controls without neoplastic disease. Demographic data were recorded, along with the Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD), risk for development periodontal diseases questionnaire and Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, and the TNM classification and stage of the primary tumor. Unstimulated basal saliva samples were collected and stored at − 80 °C until analysis.
Results
The mean salivary CA125 concentration was 102.1 pg/ml in the control group and 267.6 pg/ml in the breast cancer group (p = 0.005). The soluble Fas (sFas) concentration in turn was 84.1 pg/ml and 145.9 pg/ml, respectively (p = 0.008). None of the biomarkers was related to questionnaire-assessed risk for development of periodontal diseases. The area under the ROC curve was 0.68 for CA125 (95% CI, 0.05–0.56) and 0.67 for sFas (95% CI, 0.08–0.55).
Conclusions
The salivary biomarkers CA125 and sFas appear to be promising tools in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 November 2020
Incorrect authornames.
References
DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2015) International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 24:1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0535
Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB, Duffy SW, Evans DG, Garcia-Closas M, Gescher AJ, Key TJ, Saxton JM, Harvie MN (2014) Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 16:446. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-014-0446-2
McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM (2000) ABC of breast diseases. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 321:624–628. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7261.624
Sledge GW, Mamounas EP, Hortobagyi GN, Burstein HJ, Goodwin PJ, Wolff AC (2014) Past, present, and future challenges in breast cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 32:1979–1986. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4139
Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Martín Carreras-Presas C, Kaczor T, Tu M, Wei F, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong DTW (2017) Emerging technologies for salivaomics in cancer detection. J Cell Mol Med 21:640–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13007
Marić P, Ozretić P, Levanat S, Oresković S, Antunac K, Beketić-Oresković L (2011) Tumor markers in breast cancer--evaluation of their clinical usefulness. Coll Antropol 35:241–247
Porika M, Malotu N, Veldandi UK, Yadala N, Abbagani S (2010) Evaluation of tumor markers in southern Indian breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11:157–159
Liu X, Yu H, Qiao Y, Yang J, Shu J, Zhang J, Zhang Z, He J, Li Z (2018) Salivary glycopatterns as potential biomarkers for screening of early-stage breast cancer. EBioMedicine 28:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EBIOM.2018.01.026
Streckfus C, Bigler L (2005) The use of soluble, salivary c- erb B-2 for the detection and post-operative follow-up of breast cancer in women: the results of a five-year translational research study. Adv Dent Res 18:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/154407370501800105
Streckfus C, Bigler L (2002) Saliva as a diagnostic fluid. Oral Dis 8:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o834.x
Porto-Mascarenhas EC, Assad DX, Chardin H, Gozal D, de Luca Canto G, Acevedo AC, Guerra ENS (2017) Salivary biomarkers in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 110:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRITREVONC.2016.12.009
Sugimoto M, Wong DT, Hirayama A, Soga T, Tomita M (2010) Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry-based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer-specific profiles. Metabolomics 6:78–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-009-0178-y
Pfaffe T, Cooper-White J, Beyerlein P, Kostner K, Punyadeera C (2011) Diagnostic potential of saliva: current state and future applications. Clin Chem 57:675–687. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.153767
Liu J, Duan Y (2012) Saliva: a potential media for disease diagnostics and monitoring. Oral Oncol 48:569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORALONCOLOGY.2012.01.021
Serrano J, Herrera D (2011) Evaluación de un cuestionario para la asignación del riesgo individual en el desarrollo de las enfermedades periodontales. Periodoncia Osteointegración 21:133–142
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ (2009) Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the mini nutritional assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev 54:S59–S65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Navazesh M, Kumar SKS, University of Southern California School of Dentistry (2008) Measuring salivary flow: challenges and opportunities. J Am Dent Assoc 139(Suppl):35S–40S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0353
Contreras-Aguilar MD, Escribano D, Martínez-Subiela S, Martínez-Miró S, Rubio M, Tvarijonaviciute A, Tecles F, Cerón JJ (2017) Influence of the way of reporting alpha-amylase values in saliva in different naturalistic situations: a pilot study. PLoS One 12:e0180100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180100
Tvarijonaviciute A, Aznar-Cayuela C, Rubio CP, Ceron JJ, López-Jornet P (2017) Evaluation of salivary oxidate stress biomarkers, nitric oxide and C-reactive protein in patients with oral lichen planus and burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med 46:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12522
Jocelyn PC (1987) Spectrophotometric assay of thiols. In: Methods in enzymology. pp 44–67
Tecles F, Tvarijonaviciute A, De Torre C et al (2016) Total esterase activity in human saliva: validation of an automated assay, characterization and behaviour after physical stress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 76:324. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2016.1163417
Muraoka T, Katsuramaki T, Shiraishi H, Yokoyama MM (1990) Automated enzymatic measurement of adenosine deaminase isoenzyme activities in serum. Anal Biochem 187:268–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(90)90455-i
Barranco T, Rubio CP, Tvarijonaviciute A et al (2019) Changes of salivary biomarkers under different storage conditions: effects of temperature and length of storage. Biochem Medica 29:94–111. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.010706
Brooks MN, Wang J, Li Y, Zhang R, Elashoff D, Wong D (2008) Salivary protein factors are elevated in breast cancer patients. Mol Med Rep 1:375–378. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.1.3.375
Glazer CA, Chang SS, Ha PK, Califano JA (2009) Applying the molecular biology and epigenetics of head and neck cancer in everyday clinical practice. Oral Oncol 45:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORALONCOLOGY.2008.05.013
Bast RC, Badgwell D, Lu Z et al (2005) New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:274–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00441.x
Balan JJ, Rao RS, Premalatha BR, Patil S (2012) Analysis of tumor marker CA 125 in saliva of normal and oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: a comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 13:671–675. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1207
Tay SK, Chua EK (1994) Correlation of serum, urinary and salivary CA 125 levels in patients with adnexal masses. Ann Acad Med Singap 23:311–314
Chen DX, Schwartz PE, Li FQ (1990) Saliva and serum CA 125 assays for detecting malignant ovarian tumors. Obstet Gynecol 75:701–704
Zhang K-Y, Liu C-Y, Hua L, Wang SL, Li J (2016) Clinical evaluation of salivary carbohydrate antigen 125 and leptin in controls and parotid tumours. Oral Dis 22:630–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12505
Nagler R, Bahar G, Shpitzer T, Feinmesser R (2006) Concomitant analysis of salivary tumor markers--a new diagnostic tool for oral cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12:3979–3984. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2412
Laffont A, Goussot V, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Riedinger J-M (2018) CA 125 assay in the extension assessment of newly diagnosed breast cancers: why and how? Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 76:553–561. https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2018.1368
Papoff G, Cascino I, Eramo A et al (1996) An N-terminal domain shared by Fas/Apo-1 (CD95) soluble variants prevents cell death in vitro. J Immunol 156:4622–4630
Cheng J, Zhou T, Liu C et al (1994) Protection from Fas-mediated apoptosis by a soluble form of the Fas molecule. Science 263(80):1759–1762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7510905
Ueno T, Toi M, Tominaga T (1999) Circulating soluble Fas concentration in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 5:3529–3533
Sheen-Chen S-M, Chen H-S, Eng H-L, Chen W-J (2003) Circulating soluble Fas in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg 27:10–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6378-5
Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, Flemmig TF, Garcia R, Giannobile WV, Graziani F, Greenwell H, Herrera D, Kao RT, Kebschull M, Kinane DF, Kirkwood KL, Kocher T, Kornman KS, Kumar PS, Loos BG, Machtei E, Meng H, Mombelli A, Needleman I, Offenbacher S, Seymour GJ, Teles R, Tonetti MS (2018) Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol 89:S173–S182. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0721
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N (2018) Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol 89:S313–S318. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0739
Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, Demirel K, de Sanctis M, Ercoli C, Fan J, Geurs NC, Hughes FJ, Jin L, Kantarci A, Lalla E, Madianos PN, Matthews D, McGuire MK, Mills MP, Preshaw PM, Reynolds MA, Sculean A, Susin C, West NX, Yamazaki K (2018) Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol 45:S219–S229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12951
Hoon Tan P, Ellis I, Allison K, Brogi E, Fox SB, Lakhani S, Lazar AJ, Morris EA, Sahin A, Salgado R, Sapino A, Sasano H, Schnitt S, Sotiriou C, van Diest P, White VA, Lokuhetty D, Cree IA, The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020) The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the breast. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14091
Arias-Bujanda N, Regueira-Iglesias A, Balsa-Castro C, Nibali L, Donos N, Tomás I (2019) Accuracy of single molecular biomarkers in saliva for the diagnosis of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 47:2–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study was approved by the local Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Reference no. 2003/2018).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Jornet, P., Aznar, C., Ceron, J. et al. Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 29, 889–896 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05561-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05561-3