Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Longitudinal course and predictors of communication and affect management self-efficacy among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Self-efficacy is an important psychological resource to assist people in managing chronic illness and has been associated with psychological outcomes among patients coping with cancer. Little is known about the course of self-efficacy among gynecological cancer patients coping with cancer and the sociodemographic, medical, and psychological factors that are associated with the course of self-efficacy among these patients.

Methods

One hundred twenty-five women recently diagnosed with gynecological cancer completed a measure of communication and affective management self-efficacy at baseline, 5 weeks, 9 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 18 months post-baseline. Participants also completed measures of functional impairment, holding back, perceived unsupportive behaviors of family and friends, emotional expressivity, cancer concerns, depressive symptoms, cancer-specific intrusions and avoidance, problem-solving, and positive reappraisal coping.

Results

Growth curve modeling suggested that women varied considerably in their average reports of self-efficacy and varied with regard to their linear trajectories of self-efficacy over time. Average affect management self-efficacy increased significantly over time. Greater functional impairment, more holding back, more unsupportive responses from friends and family, less emotional expressivity, more cancer concerns, depression, intrusions, or avoidance predicted lower average self-efficacy over time. Women who were less emotionally expressive or held back sharing concerns less reported lower self-efficacy which increased over time.

Conclusions

It will be important for providers to identify gynecological cancer patients who report low ability to communicate feelings and needs and manage emotional reactions to cancer and offer them interventions which bolster self-efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The regression coefficient for the baseline variable estimates the association between the baseline variable and average self-efficacy over time, and the regression coefficient for the interaction between time and the baseline variable estimates the degree to which patients who differ in baseline variable levels increase or decrease more in self-efficacy over time. Random intercepts and time slopes for self-efficacy were included in models.

References

  1. Lorig K, Holman HR (1989) Long-term outcomes of an arthritis self-management study: effects of reinforcement efforts. Soc Sci Med 29(2):221–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gong G, Mao J (2016) Health-related quality of life among Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the predictive roles of fatigue, functional disability, self-efficacy, and social support. Nurs Res 65(1):55–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Fan H (2014) Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: a meta-analytic review. J Pain 15(8):800–814

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sperber N, Hall KS, Allen K, DeVellis BM, Lewis M, Callahan LF (2014) The role of symptoms and self-efficacy in predicting physical activity change among older adults with arthritis. J Phys Act Health 11(3):528–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinez-Calderon J, Meeus M, Struyf F, Miguel Morales-Asencio J, Gijon-Nogueron G, Luque-Suarez A (2018) The role of psychological factors in the perpetuation of pain intensity and disability in people with chronic shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMJ Open 8(4):e020703

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Somers TJ, Kurakula PC, Criscione-Schreiber L, Keefe FJ, Clowse MEB (2012) Self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing in systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship to pain, stiffness, fatigue, and psychological distress. Arthritis Care Res 64(9):1334–1340

    Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis R, Groarke A, Sullivan F (2014) Stress and self-efficacy predict psychological adjustment at diagnosis of prostate cancer. Sci Rep 4:5569

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Haugland T, Wahl AK, Hofoss D, DeVon HA (2016) Association between general self-efficacy, social support, cancer-related stress and physical health-related quality of life: a path model study in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:11

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhaoyang R, Martire LM, Sliwinski MJ (2017) Morning self-efficacy predicts physical activity throughout the day in knee osteoarthritis. Health Psychol 36(6):568–576

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinz, A., et al., The influence of self-efficacy and resilient coping on cancer patients' quality of life. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 2018: p. e12952

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Panagiotou I, Tsilika E, Galanos A, Gouliamos A (2013) Caregivers’ anxiety and self-efficacy in palliative care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 22(2):188–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rottmann N, Dalton SO, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Johansen C (2010) Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Qual Life Res 19(6):827–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grimmett C, Haviland J, Winter J, Calman L, Din A, Richardson A, Smith PWF, Foster C (2017) Colorectal cancer patient's self-efficacy for managing illness-related problems in the first 2 years after diagnosis, results from the ColoREctal Well-being (CREW) study. J Cancer Surviv 11(5):634–642

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Heitzmann CA, Merluzzi TV, Jean-Pierre P, Roscoe JA, Kirsh KL, Passik SD (2011) Assessing self-efficacy for coping with cancer: development and psychometric analysis of the brief version of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI-B). Psychooncology 20(3):302–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang FF, Yang Q, Zhang J, Han XY, Zhang JP, Ye M (2018) A self-efficacy enhancing intervention for pulmonary rehabilitation based on motivational interviewing for postoperative lung cancers patients: modeling and randomized exploratory trial. Psychol Health Med 23(7):804–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, Fox K, Grana G, Goldstein L (2006) Cancer-specific self-efficacy and psychosocial and functional adaptation to early stage breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 31(2):145–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merluzzi TV et al (2018) Social relationship coping efficacy: a new construct in understanding social support and close personal relationships in persons with cancer. Psychooncology

  19. Philip EJ, Merluzzi TV, Zhang Z, Heitzmann CA (2013) Depression and cancer survivorship: importance of coping self-efficacy in post-treatment survivors. Psychooncology 22(5):987–994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shelby RA, Edmond SN, Wren AA, Keefe FJ, Peppercorn JM, Marcom PK, Blackwell KL, Kimmick GG (2014) Self-efficacy for coping with symptoms moderates the relationship between physical symptoms and well-being in breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy. Support Care Cancer 22(10):2851–2859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeung NC, Lu Q (2014) Affect as a mediator between self-efficacy and quality of life among Chinese cancer survivors in China. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 23(1):149–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang M, Chan SWC, You L, Wen Y, Peng L, Liu W, Zheng M (2014) The effectiveness of a self-efficacy-enhancing intervention for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow up. Int J Nurs Stud 51(8):1083–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lev EL, Paul D, Owen SV (1999) Age, self-efficacy, and change in patients’ adjustment to cancer. Cancer Pract 7(4):170–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watts S, Prescott P, Mason J, McLeod N, Lewith G (2015) Depression and anxiety in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates. BMJ Open 5(11):e007618

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Telsh CF, Telch M.(1982), Stanford inventory of cancer patient adjustment

  26. Manne SL, Winkel G, Rubin S, Edelson M, Rosenblum N, Bergman C, Hernandez E, Carlson J, Rocereto T (2008) Mediators of a coping and communication-enhancing intervention and a supportive counseling intervention among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers. J Consult Clin Psychol 76(6):1034–1045

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sears SR, Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S (2003) The yellow brick road and the emerald city: benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychol 22(5):487–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Manne SL, Myers-Virtue S, Kissane D, Ozga ML, Kashy DA, Rubin SC, Rosenblum NG, Heckman CJ (2017) Group-based trajectory modeling of fear of disease recurrence among women recently diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Psychooncology 26(11):1799–1809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schag C., H.R., CARES: cancer rehabilitation evaluation system. CARES Consultants; Santa Monica, CA: . 1988

  30. Pistrang N, Barker C (1995) The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 40(6):789–797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Manne S, Glassman M (2000) Perceived control, coping efficacy, and avoidance coping as mediators between spouses’ unsupportive behaviors and cancer patients’ psychological distress. Health Psychol 19(2):155–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. King LA, Emmons RA (1990) Conflict over emotional expression: psychological and physical correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(5):864–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Manne S, Kashy DA, Zaider T, Lee D, Kim IY, Heckman C, Penedo F, Kissane D, Virtue SM (2018) Interpersonal processes and intimacy among men with localized prostate cancer and their partners. J Fam Psychol 32(5):664–675

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Beck AT et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979) Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41(3):209–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 56(2):267–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stanton AL, Wiley JF, Krull JL, Crespi CM, Weihs KL (2018) Cancer-related coping processes as predictors of depressive symptoms, trajectories, and episodes. J Consult Clin Psychol 86(10):820–830

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dorfman CS, Lamb E, van Denburg A, Wren AA, Soo MS, Faircloth K, Gandhi V, Shelby RA (2018) The relationship between holding back from communicating about breast concerns and anxiety in the year following breast biopsy. J Psychosoc Oncol 36(2):222–237

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Edmond SN, Shelby RA, Kimmick GG, Marcom PK, Peppercorn JM, Keefe FJ (2013) Symptom communication in breast cancer: relationships of holding back and self-efficacy for communication to symptoms and adjustment. J Psychosoc Oncol 31(6):698–711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwarzer R, Knoll N (2007) Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: a theoretical and empirical overview. Int J Psychol 42(4):243–252

    Google Scholar 

  41. Benight CC, Bandura A (2004) Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 42(10):1129–1148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sato M, Sumi N (2015) Factors related to self-efficacy among men and women undergoing outpatient chemotherapy in Japan. Scand J Caring Sci 29(4):745–750

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hohl DH, Lüscher J, Keller J, Heuse S, Scholz U, Luszczynska A, Knoll N (2018) Inter-relations among negative social control, self-efficacy, and physical activity in healthy couples. Br J Health Psychol 23(3):580–596

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Boyle CC, Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Crespi CM, Bower JE (2017) Improvements in emotion regulation following mindfulness meditation: effects on depressive symptoms and perceived stress in younger breast cancer survivors. J Consult Clin Psychol 85(4):397–402

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fashler SR, Weinrib AZ, Azam MA, Katz J (2018) The use of acceptance and commitment therapy in oncology settings: a narrative review. Psychol Rep 121(2):229–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Project Managers Tina Gajda, Sara Frederick, Shira Hichenberg, Kristen Sorice, and Research Study Assistants Joanna Crincoli, Katie Darabos, Arielle Schwerd, and Sloan Harrison, and the study participants, their oncologists, and the clinical teams at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Thomas Jefferson University, Morristown Medical Center, and Cooper University Hospital.

Funding source

This study was funded by NIH grant R01 CA085566 to Sharon Manne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Drs. Manne and Kashy developed the concept, with additional input from Drs. Kissane, Heckman, and Myers-Virtue. Dr. Manne drafted all sections of the manuscript other than the Results section. Dr. Kashy conducted all data analyses and drafted most of the Results section. All authors participated in revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content and have approved the final article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon L Manne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manne, S.L., Kashy, D.A., Kissane, D.W. et al. Longitudinal course and predictors of communication and affect management self-efficacy among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Support Care Cancer 28, 1929–1939 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04989-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04989-6

Keywords

Navigation