Scrambler therapy for chemotherapy neuropathy: a randomized phase II pilot trial
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prominent clinical problem, with limited effective therapies. Preliminary non-randomized clinical trial data support that Scrambler Therapy is helpful in this situation.
Patients were eligible if they had CIPN symptoms for at least 3 months and CIPN-related tingling or pain at least 4/10 in severity during the week prior to registration. They were randomized to receive Scrambler Therapy versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 2 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were utilized to measure efficacy and toxicity daily for 2 weeks during therapy and then weekly for 8 additional weeks.
This study accrued 50 patients, 25 to each of the 2 study arms; 46 patients were evaluable. There were twice as many Scrambler-treated patients who had at least a 50% documented improvement during the 2 treatment weeks, from their baseline pain, tingling, and numbness scores, when compared with the TENS-treated patients (from 36 to 56% compared with 16–28% for each symptom). Global Impression of Change scores for “neuropathy symptoms,” pain, and quality of life were similarly improved during the treatment weeks. Patients in the Scrambler group were more likely than those in the TENS group to recommend their treatment to other patients, during both the 2-week treatment period and the 8-week follow-up period (p < 0.0001). Minimal toxicity was observed.
The results from this pilot trial were positive, supporting the conduct of further investigations regarding the use of Scrambler Therapy for treating CIPN.
KeywordsScrambler TENS Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
This trial was supported by the Gateway Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Committee.
Conflict of interest
Both Charles Loprinzi and Thomas Smith had travel-related expenses provided by GEOMC Co. LTD, South Korea, a manufacturer of Scrambler Therapy machines.
- 1.Hershman DL, Lacchetti C, Dworkin RH, Lavoie Smith EM, Bleeker J, Cavaletti G, Chauhan C, Gavin P, Lavino A, Lustberg MB, Paice J, Schneider B, Smith ML, Smith T, Terstriep S, Wagner-Johnston N, Bak K, Loprinzi CL (2014) Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32:1941–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Smith EM, Pang H, Cirrincione C, Fleishman S, Paskett ED, Ahles T, Bressler LR, Fadul CE, Knox C, Le-Lindqwister N, Gilman PB, Shapiro CL (2013) Effect of duloxetine on pain, function, and quality of life among patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 309:1359–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kleckner IR, Kamen C, Gewandter JS, Mohile NA, Heckler CE, Culakova E, Fung C, Janelsins MC, Asare M, Lin PJ, Reddy PS, Giguere J, Berenberg J, Kesler SR, Mustian KM (2018) Effects of exercise during chemotherapy on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 26:1019–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Rao RD, Michalak JC, Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Soori GS, Nikcevich DA, Warner DO, Novotny P, Kutteh LA, Wong GY, North Central Cancer Treatment Group (2007) Efficacy of gabapentin in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (N00C3). Cancer 110:2110–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Marineo G (2003) Untreatable pain resulting from abdominal cancer: new hope from biophysics? JOP 4:1–10Google Scholar
- 7.Abdi S, Lakkimsetty VM, Barrera J, Candiotti KA, Lubarsky D (2011) The use of “Scrambler therapy” for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Phys 14:E465–E491Google Scholar
- 8.Campbell T, Nimunkar AJ, Retseck J, Eickhoff JC, Backonja M, Cleary JF, Kwekkeboom KL, Yen TY (2013) A randomized, double-blind study of “Scrambler” therapy versus SHAM for painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). J Clin Oncol 31(suppl):abstr 9635Google Scholar
- 10.Ghatak RK, Nandi SN, Bhakta A, Mandal GC, Bandyopadhyay M, Kumar S (2011) Prospective study of application of biological communication (cybernatics) in management of chronic low back pain--a preliminary report. Nepal Med Coll J 13:257–260Google Scholar
- 16.Sabato AF, Marineo G, Gatti A (2005) Scrambler therapy. Minerva Anestesiol 71:479–482Google Scholar
- 18.Sparadeo F, D’Amato S (2014) Scrambler therapy: effective use of artificial neurons for the treatment of neuropathic pain. J Nurse Life Care Plan 14:19–30Google Scholar
- 19.Sparadeo F, Kaufman C, D’Amato S (2012) Scrambler therapy: an innovative and effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. J Life Care Plan 11(3):3–15Google Scholar
- 25.Compagnone C, Tagliaferri F, Scrambler Therapy G (2015) Chronic pain treatment and scrambler therapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Acta Biomed 86:149–156Google Scholar
- 30.Postma TJ, Aaronson NK, Heimans JJ, Muller MJ, Hildebrand JG, Delattre JY, Hoang-Xuan K, Lanteri-Minet M, Grant R, Huddart R, Moynihan C, Maher J, Lucey R, Group EQoL (2005) The development of an EORTC quality of life questionnaire to assess chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: the QLQ-CIPN20. Eur J Cancer 41:1135–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Barton DL, Wos EJ, Qin R, Mattar BI, Green NB, Lanier KS, Bearden JD 3rd, Kugler JW, Hoff KL, Reddy PS, Rowland KM Jr, Riepl M, Christensen B, Loprinzi CL (2011) A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a topical treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: NCCTG trial N06CA. Support Care Cancer 19:833–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Kautio AL, Haanpaa M, Leminen A, Kalso E, Kautiainen H, Saarto T (2009) Amitriptyline in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic symptoms. Anticancer Res 29:2601–2606Google Scholar
- 41.Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Pahlman L (2007) Transatlantic laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy trials study G: laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar