Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1721–1728 | Cite as

The influence of partner involvement in the decision-making process on body image and decision regret among women receiving breast reconstruction

  • Nai-Tzu Kuo
  • Yao-Lung Kuo
  • Hung-Wen Lai
  • Nai-Ying Ko
  • Su-Ying FangEmail author
Original Article
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines the influence of partner involvement in decision-making for breast reconstruction (BR) on women’s body image and post-BR decision regret.

Methods

A cross-sectional and correlational approach was used in a convenience sample of 105 women in Taiwan who had breast cancer (BC) whose partners were involved in decision-making for BR. A structured questionnaire including the Involvement in the Breast Reconstruction Decision-Making Process Scale, the Body Image Scale, and the Decision Regret Scale was administered. Pearson’s r and path analysis were used to examine the relationships among the dyadic BR decision-making process, women’s body image, and decision regret.

Results

The greater the amount of medical information women had, the better their body image and the less decision regret they experienced. Moreover, partner involvement was not related to women’s body image, though it was inversely related to women’s decision regret. The final path model showed that the amount of medical information women obtained was directly related to body image and decision regret, while body image also directly influenced decision regret. Overall, the amount of medical information women obtained and their body image explained 45% of the variance in decision regret.

Conclusions

Medical teams should provide female BC patients with complete medical information, and through partner involvement, women can be supported to make an appropriate decision regarding BR to achieve optimal levels of body image and lower levels of decision regret.

Keywords

Breast reconstructive surgery Partner involvement Decision-making process Body image Decision regret 

Notes

Funding

This research was partially funded by the National Cheng Kung University of Taiwan, and the authors declare that they have no financial relationship with the organization that funded the research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was approved by committee of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (Taiwan) (IRB number B-ER-104-097) and Changhua Christian Hospital (Taiwan) (IRB number 150711). All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The authors have full control of all primary data, and they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO (2017) Cancer fact sheets: breast cancer cancer. Retrieved from http://gco.iarc.fr/today/fact-sheets-cancers?cancer=15&type=0&sex=2. Accessed May 24, 2018
  2. 2.
    NIH (2017) Cancer stat facts: female breast cancer. Retrieved from https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html. Accessed May 24, 2018
  3. 3.
    Taiwan Cancer Registry. Five-year survival rate of breast cancer: Taiwan Cancer Registry. 2013. https://cris.hpa.gov.tw/pagepub/Home.aspx?item No=cr.a.10. Accessed May 24, 2018
  4. 4.
    Jeevan R, Mennie JC, Mohanna PN, O'Donoghue JM, Rainsbury RM, Cromwell DA (2016) National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg 103(9):1147–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang NS, Liu MY, Chen JJ, Yang BL, Xue JY, Quan CL, Mo M, Liu GY, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM, Wu J (2016) Surgical management of breast cancer in China: a 15-year single-center retrospective study of 18,502 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(45):e4201.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang B, Song Q, Zhang B, Tang Z, Xie X, Yang H, He J, Li H, Li J, Li J, Fan J, Huang R, Zhang H, Qiao Y (2013) A 10-year (1999 ~ 2008) retrospective multi-center study of breast cancer surgical management in various geographic areas of China. Breast 22(5):676–681.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Spillane A (2017) Decisional regret and choice of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 27:1110–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fang SY, Balneaves LG, Shu BC (2010) “A struggle between vanity and life”: the experience of receiving breast reconstruction in women of Taiwan. Cancer Nurs 33(5):E1–E11.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181d1c853
  9. 9.
    Halkett GK, Arbon P, Scutter SD, Borg M (2007) The phenomenon of making decisions during the experience of early breast cancer. European J Cancer Care 16(4):322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00778.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Y, Xu H, Wang T, He J, Qiao Y, Wei J, Dong J (2015) Psychosocial predictors and outcomes of delayed breast reconstruction in mastectomized women in mainland China: an observational study. PLoS One 10(12):e0144410.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilbar R, Gilbar O (2009) The medical decision-making process and the family: the case of breast cancer patients and their husbands. Bioethics 23(3):183–192.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00650.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lillie SE, Janz NK, Friese CR, Graff JJ, Schwartz K, Hamilton AS, Gay BB, Katz SJ, Hawley ST (2014) Racial and ethnic variation in partner perspectives about the breast cancer treatment decision-making experience. Oncol Nurs Forum 41(1):13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1188/14.onf.13-20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Wieselquist J, Whitton SW (1999) Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(2):293–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Gremore TM, Wiesenthal N, Aldridge W, Fredman SJ, Stanton SE, Scott JL, Halford KW, Keefe FJ (2009) A couple-based intervention for female breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 18(3):276–283.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalaitzi C, Papadopoulos VP, Michas K, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Filippou D (2007) Combined brief psychosexual intervention after mastectomy: effects on sexuality, body image, and psychological well-being. J Surg Oncol 96(3):235–240.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott JL, Kayser K (2009) A review of couple-based interventions for enhancing women’s sexual adjustment and body image after cancer. Cancer J (Sudbury, Mass) 15(1):48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31819585df CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Northouse LL, Katapodi MC, Song L, Zhang L, Mood DW (2010) Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):317–339.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20081 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lahat A, Neuman S, Eliakim R, Ben-Horin S (2014) Partners of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: how important is their support? Clin Exp Gastroenterol 7:255–259.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ceg.s62173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polit DF, Beck CT (2006) The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nursing Health 29(5):489–497.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S (2001) A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 37(2):189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aguilar Cordero MJ, Neri Sanchez M, Mur Villar N, Gomez Valverde E (2013) Influence of the social context on the body image perception of women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Nutricion Hospitalaria 28(5):1453–1457.  https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2013.28.5.6517 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomez-Campelo P, Bragado-Alvarez C, Hernandez-Lloreda MJ, Sanchez-Bernardos ML (2015) The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients. Supportive Care Cancer: Official J Multinational Assoc Supportive Care Cancer 23(2):473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2383-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McDermott E, Mullen G, Moloney J, Keegan D, Byrne K, Doherty GA, Cullen G, Malone K, Mulcahy HE (2015) Body image dissatisfaction: clinical features, and psychosocial disability in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21(2):353–360.  https://doi.org/10.1097/mib.0000000000000287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fang SY, Chang HT, Shu BC (2014) Objectified body consciousness, body image discomfort, and depressive symptoms among breast cancer survivors in Taiwan. Psychology Women Quarterly 38(4):563–574.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314552652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D (2003) Validation of a decision regret scale. Medical Decision Making: An Int J Soc Medical Decision Making 23(4):281–292.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x03256005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chinese translation of Decision Regret Scale (2006) http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/Tools/Regret_Scale_Chinese.pdf
  27. 27.
    Sheehan J, Sherman KA, Lam T, Boyages J (2008) Regret associated with the decision for breast reconstruction: the association of negative body image, distress and surgery characteristics with decision regret. Psychol Health 23(2):207–219.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601124899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhong T, Bagher S, Jindal K, Zeng D, O'Neill AC, MacAdam S, Butler K, Hofer SO, Pusic A, Metcalfe KA (2013) The influence of dispositional optimism on decision regret to undergo major breast reconstructive surgery. J Surg Oncol 108(8):526–530.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Spillane A (2018) Decisional regret and choice of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 27(4):1110–1120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ditsch N, Bauerfeind I, Vodermaier A, Tripp C, Lohrs B, Toth B, Himsl I, Graeser M, Harbeck N, Lenhard M (2013) A retrospective investigation of women's experience with breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(3):555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2590-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Kwan L, Meyerowitz BE, Bower JE, Krupnick JL, Rowland JH, Leedham B, Belin TR (2005) Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(25):6009–6018.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.09.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, O'Neill AC, Beber B, Hofer SO, Metcalfe KA (2013) Decision regret following breast reconstruction: the role of self-efficacy and satisfaction with information in the preoperative period. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):724e–734e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3bf5d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fang SY, Chang HT, Shu BC (2015) The moderating effect of perceived partner empathy on body image and depression among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 24(12):1815–1822.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zimmermann T, Scott JL, Heinrichs N (2010) Individual and dyadic predictors of body image in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 19(10):1061–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muhamad M, Afshari M, Kazilan F (2011) Family support in cancer survivorship. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention: APJCP 12(6):1389–1397Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fasse L, Flahault C, Vioulac C, Lamore K, Van Wersch A, Quintard B, Untas A (2017) The decision-making process for breast reconstruction after cancer surgery: representations of heterosexual couples in long-standing relationships. Br J Health Psychol 22(2):254–269.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Spillane A (2017) Making decisions about breast reconstruction: a systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 26:2287–2319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1555-z Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NursingTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan and Dou-Liou BranchTainanTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung University, Tainan and Dou-Liou BranchTainanTaiwan
  4. 4.Comprehensive Breast Cancer Center, Department of SurgeryChanghua Christian HospitalChanghuaTaiwan
  5. 5.School of MedicineNational Yang Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  6. 6.Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  7. 7.Department of Nursing, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  8. 8.Department of Nursing, College of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations