Coping strategies, trajectories, and their associations with patient-reported outcomes among women with ovarian cancer
Most women with ovarian cancer present with advanced stage disease and face aggressive treatments, recurrence, and possible death, yet little is known about how they cope. Our objective was to identify coping strategies used by women with ovarian cancer and their trajectories of use after diagnosis and to assess if coping trajectories are associated with subsequent anxiety, depression, or quality of life.
Women with ovarian cancer completed questionnaires including the Brief-COPE, HADS, and FACT at 3, 6, and 9 months after diagnosis and the HADS and FACT at 12 months. Using data from 634 women who completed the 3-month questionnaire, factor analysis was conducted to identify coping strategy clusters. Trajectory modeling was used to assess patterns of coping over time. Associations between coping trajectory from 3 to 9 months and patient-reported outcomes at 12 months were investigated using general linear models.
Three coping strategy clusters were identified. Use of “taking action/positive framing” followed four distinct trajectories over time: low-stable (44%), medium-stable (32%), medium-decreasing (11%), high-stable (12%). Use of “social/emotional support” had four trajectories: low-increasing (7%), low-decreasing (44%), medium-decreasing (40%), and high-stable (8%). Women either “accepted their reality” (26%) or “used some denial” (74%). Women who accepted reality reported significantly less anxiety and depression and better quality of life at 12 months. Women with high-stable use of taking action/positive framing reported less depression. Women with high-stable use of social/emotional support reported better quality of life.
Strategies to assist women with acceptance, action-planning, positive-framing, and maintaining psychosocial support should be considered.
KeywordsOvarian cancer Coping Anxiety Depression Quality of life
We acknowledge the OPAL Study team and all the clinicians and participating institutions who helped make this study possible (see opalstudy.qimrberghofer.edu.au for a complete list). We also thank consumer representatives Karen Livingstone, Hélène O’Neill, and Merran Williams and all the women who took part.
The OPAL study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (GNT1025142, GNT1073898). Collection of additional MOST data was funded by BUPA Health Foundation and the QIMR Berghofer Weekend to End Women’s Cancers 2014. PM Webb was supported by an NHMRC Fellowship (GNT1043134) and A DeFazio is supported by the University of Sydney Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Institute NSW through the Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 12.Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress appraisal and coping. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Roberts D, Calman L, Large P, Appleton L, Grande G, Lloyd-Williams M, Walshe C (2018) A revised model for coping with advanced cancer. Mapping concepts from a longitudinal qualitative study of patients and carers coping with advanced cancer onto Folkman and Greer’s theoretical model of appraisal and coping. Psycho-Oncology 27:229-235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.King MT, Stockler MR, Butow P, O’Connell R, Voysey M, Oza AM, Gillies K, Donovan HS, Mercieca-Bebber R, Martyn J, Sjoquist K, Friedlander ML (2014) Development of the measure of ovarian symptoms and treatment concerns: aiming for optimal measurement of patient-reported symptom benefit with chemotherapy for symptomatic ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24:865–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Christ GH (1991) A model for the development of psychosocial interventions recent results in cancer research Fortschritte Der Krebsforschung Progrès Dans les Recherches Sur Le. Cancer 121:301–312Google Scholar
- 31.Price MA, Butow PN, Bell ML, deFazio A, Friedlander M, Fardell JE, Protani MM, Webb PM (2016) Helplessness/hopelessness, minimization and optimism predict survival in women with invasive ovarian cancer: a role for targeted support during initial treatment decision-making? Support Care Cancer 24:2627-34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hulbert-Williams N, Owen R (2015) Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for cancer patients. In: Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Butow PN, Jacobsen PB, Loscalzo MJ, McCorkle R, Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Butow PN, Jacobsen PB, Loscalzo MJ, McCorkle R (eds) Psycho-oncology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 521–525Google Scholar
- 35.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) Gynaecological cancers in Australia: an overview. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 36.Australian Cancer Network and the National Breast Cancer Centre (2004) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Camperdown, NSWGoogle Scholar