Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study in routine clinical practice from a single institution

  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most common and most critical adverse effects of chemotherapy. Despite many existing guidelines based on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), FN continues to impair the quality of life and interfere with the treatment of many patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and management of FN associated with chemotherapy for early breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

Methods

All patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) treated by chemotherapy at Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, in 2014 were retrospectively included. The incidence and management of FN were reported. Risk factors associated with FN were studied by robust-error-variance Poisson regression.

Results

A total of 524 patients received either neoadjuvant (N = 130) or adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 394). Most patients (80%) were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC100; 3 cycles) followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (D; 3 cycles). The overall incidence of FN was 17%. Eighteen percent of patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) for FN with G-CSF, using pegfilgrastim in 64% of cases and 74% of patients over the age of 70 received PP. Less than 5% of patients who received PP experienced FN. Recurrent FN after secondary prophylaxis was observed in 9% of patients. Forty-seven percent of cases of FN occurred after the first cycle and 30% occurred after the fourth cycle, corresponding to D ± trastuzumab (T). The FEC100 regimen was associated with a relative risk of FN of 1.98 (p = 0.09). Autoimmune (AI) and inflammatory diseases were associated with a higher risk of FN (RR 3.08; p < 0.01). No significant difference in the incidence of FN was observed between adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FN was managed on an outpatient basis in 72% of cases. Outpatients with FN were mainly treated by a combination of amoxicillin–clavulanic acid and ciprofloxacin. Dose reduction or chemotherapy regimen modification were necessary in 25% of patients after FN. No toxic death was reported.

Conclusion

The incidence of FN induced by adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ESBC is higher in routine clinical practice than in clinical trials. AI or inflammatory diseases were significant independent risk factors for FN. Primary prophylaxis in patients at risk (elderly, comorbid patients), especially treated with the FEC regimen, is the keystone of management of this adverse effect. Prevention and management of FN to ensure the patient’s safety and quality of life are a major issue for both medical oncologists and supportive care physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Les cancers en France, édition2016, INCa 2017, http://www.e-cancer.fr/ressources/cancers_en_france/#page=13

  2. Kuderer NM (2006) Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 106:2258–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyman GH, Rolston (2010) How we treat febrile neutropenia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract 6(3):149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kosaka Y (2015) Phase III placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of pegfilgrastim to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 23(4):1137–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith TJ et al (2006) Update recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence based clinical practice guideline. J Clinic Oncol 24(19):3187–3205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aapro MS et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of GCSF to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 47(1):8–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klastersky J et al (2016) Management of febrile neutropaenia : ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 27(Supplement 5):v111–v118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roche H et al (2006) Sequential adjuvant epirubicin-based and docetaxel chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: the FNCLCC PACS 01 trial. J Clin Oncol 24:5664–5671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cousin S et al (2012) Febrile neutropenia incidence and hematological toxicity with the FEC100- docetaxel regimen in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Bull Cancer 99(7–8):75–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rayson D et al (2012) Incidence of febrile neutropenia during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a prospective study. Curr Oncol 19(3):e216–e218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Younis T et al (2012) Primary G-CSF prophylaxis for adjuvant TC or FEC-D chemotherapy outside of clinical trial settings: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 20(10):2523–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Assi H et al (2014) Incidence of febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant FEC-D treatment. Support Care Cancer 22:3227–3234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miguel I, Winckler P, Sousa M, Cardoso C, Moreira A, Brito M (2015) Febrile neutropenia in FEC-D regimen for early stage breast cancer: is there a place for G-CSF primary prophylaxis? Breast Dis 35(3):167–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP et al (2002) Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 34:730–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zou G (2004) A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 159(7):702–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacot W (2015) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) use in clinical practice in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer: the Opaline Study. Bull Cancer 102(12):979–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maenpaa J (2016) The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and management of chemotherapy delivery during adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: further observations from the IMPACT solid study. Breast 25:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kern WV (2013) Oral antibiotics for fever in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer : a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial comparing single daily moxifloxacin with twice daily ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid combination therapy—EORTC infectious diseases group trial XV. JCO 31(9):1149–1156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weycker D (2012) Risk and healthcare costs of chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications in women with metastatic breast cancer. Chemotherapy 58(1):8–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rouge-Bugat ME (2015) Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners. Support Care Cancer 23(12):3473–3480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Madarnas Y (2011) Real-world experience with adjuvant FEC-D chemotherapy in four Ontario regional cancer centers. Curr Oncol 18(3):119–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Raza S (2009) Relative dose intensity delivered to patients with early breast cancer: Canadian experience. Curr Oncol 16(6):8–12

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Calip GS (2015) Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following adjuvant chemotherapy with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154:133–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Luthra R, Morrow PK, Fisher MD, Reiner M, Barron RL, Langeberg WJ (2016) Comorbidities among patients with cancer who do and do not develop febrile neutropenia during the first chemotherapy cycle. J Oncol Pharm Pract 22(5):679–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joy Bacrie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

They have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bacrie, J., Laurans, M., Iorio, P. et al. Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study in routine clinical practice from a single institution. Support Care Cancer 26, 4097–4103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4280-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4280-4

Keywords

Navigation