Skip to main content

The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in cancer rehabilitation: current prescription, pitfalls, and future directions

Supportive Care in Cancer volume 26, pages 3661–3663 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

The plethora of treatment complications associated with cancer can be offset by regular exercise participation; however, adherence to current guidelines is poor, in particular in those unable or not allowed to participate in voluntary exercise due to their underlying disease. Alternative therapies such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are promising although previous results in cancer survivors have been equivocal. This is likely in response to methodological issues such as inappropriate NMES prescription. Therefore, the aim of this commentary is to propose three key areas which should be addressed to increase NMES effectiveness in cancer rehabilitation; (1) NMES exercise should target both the neuromuscular and cardiovascular systems through low- and high-frequency modalities, (2) technological advancements such as mobile app-based systems should be leveraged to improve at-home monitoring of home-based NMES exercise, and (3) prescription and progression should follow the fundamental principles of exercise to overcome the heterogeneity in daily physiological, functional, and psychological factors faced by survivors. Addressing these three key areas in future studies may help improve NMES exercise effectiveness and accelerate patient rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Askoxylakis V, Thieke C, Pleger ST, Most P, Tanner J, Lindel K, Katus HA, Debus J, Bischof M (2010) Long-term survival of cancer patients compared to heart failure and stroke: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 10:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Boffetta P, Levi F, la Vecchia C, Negri E (2016) European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukaemias. Ann Oncol 27:725–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw022

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvão DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen V, Schwartz AL, American College of Sports Medicine (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42:1409–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sturgeon KM, Fisher C, McShea G, Sullivan SK, Sataloff D, Schmitz KH (2017) Patient preference and timing for exercise in breast cancer care. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 26:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3856-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maddocks M, Armstrong S, Wilcock A (2011) Exercise as a supportive therapy in incurable cancer: exploring patient preferences. Psychooncology 20:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crevenna R (2013) From neuromuscular electrical stimulation and biofeedback-assisted exercise up to triathlon competitions—regular physical activity for cancer patients in Austria. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 10:53–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11556-012-0110-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maddocks M, Gao W, Higginson IJ et al (2016) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD009419. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cenik F, Schoberwalter D, Keilani M, Maehr B, Wolzt M, Marhold M, Crevenna R (2016) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the thighs in cardiac patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128:802–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crevenna R, Marosi C, Schmidinger M, Fialka-Moser V (2006) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for a patient with metastatic lung cancer—a case report. Support Care Cancer 14:970–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0033-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maddocks M, Lewis M, Chauhan A, Manderson C, Hocknell J, Wilcock A (2009) Randomized controlled pilot study of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 38:950–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maddocks M, Halliday V, Chauhan A, Taylor V, Nelson A, Sampson C, Byrne A, Griffiths G, Wilcock A (2013) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy: a randomized phase II study. PLoS One 8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086059

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Windholz T, Swanson T, Vanderbyl BL, Jagoe RT (2014) Correction: the feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve exercise performance in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study. BMC Palliat Care 13:33–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-33

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Minogue CM, Caulfield BM, Reilly RB (2007) What are the electrical stimulation design parameters for maximum VO 2 aimed at cardio-pulmonary rehabilitation? In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings. pp 2428–2431

  14. Banerjee P, Caulfield B, Crowe L, Clark AL (2009) Prolonged electrical muscle stimulation exercise improves strength, peak VO2, and exercise capacity in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Card Fail 15:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caulfield B, Prendergast A, Rainsford G, Minogue C (2013) Self directed home based electrical muscle stimulation training improves exercise tolerance and strength in healthy elderly. Conf Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Annu Conf 2013:7036–7039. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6611178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prince S, Adamo K, Hamel M et al (2008) A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Absolom K, Holch P, Amir Z (2017) Introduction to special section on digital technology and cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv 11:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0644-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chughtai M, Piuzzi N, Yakubek G, Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan AA, Nasir S, Yates BST, Bhave A, Mont MA (2017) Use of an app-controlled neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for improved self-management of knee conditions and reduced costs. Surg Technol Int 31:221–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sasso JP, Eves ND, Christensen JF, Koelwyn GJ, Scott J, Jones LW (2015) A framework for prescription in exercise-oncology research. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 6:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rhea MR, Alderman BL (2004) A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs. Res Q Exerc Sport 75:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mann JB, Thyfault JP, Ivey PA, Sayers SP (2010) The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes. J Strength Cond Res 24:1718–1723. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181def4a6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fairman CM, Zourdos MC, Helms ER, Focht BC (2017) A scientific rationale to improve resistance training prescription in exercise oncology. Sport Med 47:1457–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0673-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

D O’Connor is supported by a grant from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 722012.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, O’Brien Centre for Science, University College Dublin, Bellfield Campus, Dublin, Ireland

    Dominic O’Connor & Brian Caulfield

Authors
  1. Dominic O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Caulfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominic O’Connor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connor, D., Caulfield, B. The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in cancer rehabilitation: current prescription, pitfalls, and future directions. Support Care Cancer 26, 3661–3663 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4269-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4269-z

Keywords

  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical function
  • Technology