Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 3365–3377 | Cite as

A two-dimensional model of disrupted body integrity: initial evaluation in head and neck cancer

  • Kenneth Mah
  • Sophie Lebel
  • Jonathan Irish
  • Andrea Bezjak
  • Ada Y. M. Payne
  • Gerald M. Devins
Original Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This cross-sectional study presents an initial psychometric evaluation of a two-dimensional (perceptual and evaluative) conceptualization and measure of disrupted body integrity (DBI)—illness-related disruption of the sense of the body as an integrated, smoothly functioning whole.

Methods

Male and female head and neck cancer (HNC) outpatients (N = 98) completed a questionnaire package prior to outpatient visits.

Main outcome measures

The Disrupted Body Integrity Scale (DBIS) was developed to measure the perceptual and evaluative facets of DBI. Self-report measures of disfigurement, stigma, depressive symptoms, and negative affect were also completed.

Results

Almost all DBIS subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. Results largely supported the DBIS’s construct validity. The majority of subscales correlated within the predicted range of r’s = .40–.70. Almost all DBIS constructs were positively linked with either depressive symptoms or disfigurement. None correlated with positive affect, and only two subscales, abnormal sensations (perceptual) and physical vulnerability (evaluative), correlated with negative affect. DBIS constructs showed little relation with stigma, once disfigurement effects were controlled for.

Conclusions

Findings offer preliminary evidence for the DBIS and the relevance of DBI in HNC. Further evaluation of DBI in disease adaptation and the DBIS’s factor structure is warranted.

Keywords

Head and neck cancer Body experience Embodiment Psychometric evaluation Adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the efforts of our research assistants on this project: Michelle Majcen, Jackie Wan, Colleen Simpson, Vivian Tsung, and Ka Ming Fong. We extend our gratitude to the members of the UHN Quality of Life Manuscript-Review Seminar for their invaluable feedback and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding information

This research was supported in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Postdoctoral Fellowship to Sophie Lebel, a Senior Investigator Award to Gerald M. Devins, and a grant from the Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Program (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) to Sophie Lebel.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, Greiner CB, Altmaier EM, Burish TG, Antin JH, Gingrich R, McGarigle C, Henslee-Downey PJ (1995) “Returning to normal” following bone marrow transplantation: outcomes, expectations and informed consent. Bone Marrow Transplant 15:573–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold EM (1999) The cessation of cancer treatment as a crisis. Soc Work Health Care 29:21–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baxter NN, Goodwin PJ, Mcleod RS, Dion R, Devins G, Bombardier C (2006) Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire. Breast J 12:221–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanke O (2012) Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci 13:556–571CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradburn NM (1969) The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Callahan C (2004) Facial disfigurement and sense of self in head and neck cancer. Soc Work Health Care 40:73–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carver CS, Pozo-Kaderman C, Price AA, Noriega V, Harris SD, Derhagopian RP, Robinson DS, Moffat FL Jr (1998) Concern about aspects of body image and adjustment to early stage breast cancer. Psychosom Med 60:168–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cash TF (2000) The multidimensional body-self relations questionnaire users’ manual. Old Dominion University, NorfolkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charmaz K (2002) The self as habit: the reconstruction of self in chronic illness. OTJR 22:31S–41SGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crowne DP, Marlowe D (1960) A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 24:349–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Boer MF, Pruyn JFA, van den Borne B, Knegt PP, Ryckman RM, Verwoerd CDA (1995) Rehabilitation outcomes of long-term survivors treated for head and neck cancer. Head Neck 17:503–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Vignemont F (2010) Body schema and body image: pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48:669–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devins GM, Orme CM, Costello CG, Binik YM, Frizzell B, Stam HJ, Pullin WM (1988) Measuring depressive symptoms in illness populations: psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Psychol Health 2:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ervik B, Asplund K (2012) Dealing with a troublesome body: a qualitative interview study of men's experiences living with prostate cancer treated with endocrine therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16:103–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fabbri S, Kapur N, Wells A, Creed F (2001) Emotional, cognitive, and behavioral characteristics of medical outpatients: a preliminary analysis. Psychosomatics 42:74–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fingeret MC, Yuan Y, Urbauer D, Weston J, Nipomnick S, Weber R (2012) The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology 21:836–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fuchs T, Schlimme JE (2009) Embodiment and psychopathology: a phenomenological perspective. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22:570–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gardner RM (2012) Perceptual measures of body image for adolescents and adults. In: Cash TF, Smolak L (eds) Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. Guilford, New York, pp 146–153Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heathcote LC, Eccleston C (2017) Pain and cancer survival: a cognitive-affective model of symptom appraisal and the uncertain threat of disease recurrence. Pain 158:1187–1191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Helgeson VS, Snyder P, Seltman H (2004) Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health Psychol 23:3–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Henry M, Ho A, Lambert SD, Carnevale FA, Greenfield B, MacDonald C, Mlynarek A, Zeitouni A, Rosberger Z, Hier M, Black M, Kost K, Frenkiel S (2014) Looking beyond disfigurement: the experience of patients with head and neck cancer. J Palliat Care 30:5–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Janoff-Bulman R, Frieze IH (1983) A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. J Soc Issues 39:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jim HS, Jacobsen PB (2008) Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth in cancer survivorship: a review. Cancer J 14:414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ (2000) Reliability and validity of an observer-rated disfigurement scale for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 22:132–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ (2003) Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck 25:103–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lang H, France E, Williams B, Humphris G, Wells M (2013) The psychological experience of living with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psychooncology 22:2648–2663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lebel S, Castonguay M, Mackness G, Irish J, Bezjak A, Devins GM (2013) The psychosocial impact of stigma in people with head and neck or lung cancer. Psychooncology 22:140–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lindwall L, Bergbom I (2009) The altered body after breast cancer surgery. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 4:280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Longo MR, Azanon E, Haggard P (2010) More than skin deep: body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia 48:655–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lundgren H, Bolund C (2007) Body experience and reliance in some women diagnosed with cancer. Cancer Nurs 30:16–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahlo L, Tiggemann M (2016) Yoga and positive body image: a test of the embodiment model. Body Image 18:135–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McDowell I, Newell C (1996) Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meng X-L, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB (1992) Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 111:72–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Merleau-Ponty M (1978) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murray CD (2004) An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil 26:963–973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Parton CM, Ussher JM, Perz J (2015) Women’s construction of embodiment and the abject sexual body after cancer. Qual Health Res 26:490–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pazzaglia M, Galli G (2014) Loss of agency in apraxia. Front Hum Neurosci 8:751.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00751 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pedersen B, Groenkjaer M, Falkmer U, Mark E, Delmar C (2016) “The ambiguous transforming body”—a phenomenological study of the meaning of weight changes among women treated for breast cancer. Int J Nurs Stud 55:15–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Petronis VM, Carver CS, Antoni MH, Weiss S (2003) Investment in body image and psychosocial well-being among women treated for early stage breast cancer: partial replication and extension. Psychol Health 18:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Price MJ (1993) Exploration of body listening: health and physical self-awareness in chronic illness. Adv Nurs Sci 15:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rabinor JR, Bilich M (2012) Experiential approaches to body image change. In: Cash TF, Smolak L (eds) Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. Guilford, New York, pp 424–433Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Raguram R, Weiss MG, Channabasavanna SM, Devins GM (1996) Stigma, depression and somatization in South India. Am J Psychiatry 153:1043–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Röing M, Hirsch J-M, Holmström I (2007) The uncanny mouth–a phenomenological approach to oral cancer. Patient Educ Couns 67:301–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schmidt NB, Lerew DR, Trakowski JH (1997) Body vigilance in panic disorder: evaluating attention to bodily perturbations. J Consult Clin Psychol 65:214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Senkowski D, Heinz A (2016) Chronic pain and distorted body image: implications for multisensory feedback interventions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 69:252–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Silvia PJ, Duval TS (2001) Objective self-awareness theory: recent progress and enduring problems. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 5:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Slatman J (2011) The meaning of body experience evaluation in oncology. Health Care Anal 19:295–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smolak L, Cash TF (2012) Future challenges for body image science, practice, and prevention. In: Cash TF, Smolak L (eds) Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. Guilford, New York, pp 471–478Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Teo I, Novy DM, Chang DW, Cox MG, Fingeret MC (2015) Examining pain, body image, and depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. Psychooncology 24:1377–1383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Thomas R, Quinlan E, Kowalski K, Spriggs P, Hamoline R (2014) Beyond the body: insights from an iyengar yoga program for women with disability after breast cancer. Holist Nurs Pract 28:353–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Weber CS, Fliege H, Arck PC, Kruezer K-A, Rose M, Klapp BF (2004) Patients with haematological malignancies show a restricted body image focusing on function and emotion. Eur J Cancer Care 14:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Weiss MG, Doongaji DR, Siddhartha S, Wypij D, Pathare S, Bhatawdekar M, Bhave A, Sheth A, Fernandes R (1992) The explanatory model interview catalogue (EMIC): Contribution to cross-cultural research methods from a study of leprosy and mental health. Br J Psychiatry 160:819–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Weiss MG, Ramakrishna J, Somma D (2006) Health-related stigma: rethinking concepts and interventions. Psychol Health Med 11:277–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Supportive CarePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network)TorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Surgical OncologyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network)TorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Ontario Cancer InstituteTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of Radiation OncologyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network)TorontoCanada
  7. 7.Cancer Care OntarioTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations