Cancer survivors’ experiences of a community-based cancer-specific exercise programme: results of an exploratory survey
Exercise levels often decline following cancer diagnosis despite growing evidence of its benefits. Treatment side effects, older age, lack of confidence and opportunity to exercise with others in similar circumstances influence this. Our study explored the experiences of people attending a cancer-specific community-based exercise programme (CU Fitter™).
A survey distributed to those attending the programme gathered demographic/clinical information, self-reported exercise levels, information provision and barriers to/benefits of exercise.
Sixty surveys were evaluable from 65/100 returned (62% female, 68% > 60 years, 66% breast/prostate cancer). Most (68%) were receiving treatment. Sixty-eight percent attended classes once or twice weekly. Fifty-five percent received exercise advice after diagnosis, usually from their hospital doctor/nurse. More (73%) had read about exercising, but less used the Internet to source information (32%). Self-reported exercise levels were higher currently than before diagnosis (p = 0.05). Forty-eight percent said their primary barrier to exercising was the physical impact of cancer/treatment. Improving fitness/health (40%) and social support (16%) were the most important gains from the programme. Many (67%) had made other lifestyle changes and intented to keep (50%) or increase (30%) exercising.
This community-based cancer-specific exercise approach engaged people with cancer and showed physical, psychological, and social benefits.
Implications for cancer survivors
Community-grown exercise initiatives bring cancer survivors together creating their own supportive environment. Combining this with instructors familiar with the population and providing an open-ended service may prove particularly motivating and beneficial. Further work is required to provide evidence for this.
KeywordsCancer Exercise Health behaviour Physical activity Quality of life Survivorship
We would like to thank all the respondents who found time to complete the survey.
Compliance with ethical standards
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS) Research Governance and Ethics Committee (Ref No: 16/024/HAR) granted ethical approval for the study.
Conflict of interest
Susan Catt and Helena Harder have no conflicts of interest to declare. Jan Sheward and Erica Sheward are Trustees of Cancer United™ (No.1155747), a registered cancer support charity based in West Sussex, UK through which the CU Fitter™ programme is delivered.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone JR, Loblaw A, Petrella T (2017) Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 24:40–46Google Scholar
- 5.Department of Health. UK Physical activity guidelines – Fact sheets 4 (adults 19–64 years) and 5 (older adults 65+ years). 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-physical-activity-guidelines. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
- 10.Arthur AE, Delk A, Demark-Wahnefried W, Christein JD, Contreras C, Posey JA III, Vickers S, Oster R, Rogers LQ (2016) Pancreatic cancer survivors’ preferences, barriers, and facilitators related to physical activity and diet interventions. J Cancer Surviv 10:981–989CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Smith L, Crocker H, Fisher A, Williams K, Wardle J, Beeken RJ (2017) Cancer survivors’ attitudes towards and knowledge of physical activity, sources of information, and barriers and facilitators of engagement: a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12641
- 14.Cummins C, Kayes NM, Reeve J, Smith G, MacLeod R, McPherson KM (2017) Navigating physical activity engagement following a diagnosis of cancer: a qualitative exploration. Eur J Cancer Care 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12608
- 16.Godin G (2011) The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire. Health Fit J Can 4:18–22Google Scholar
- 19.Burke S, Wurz A, Bradshaw A, Saunders S, West MA, Brunet J (2017) Physical activity and quality of life in cancer survivors: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Cancers 9(5):E53Google Scholar
- 25.Macmillan move more: physical activity the underrated ‘wonder drug’. 2011. https://www.macmillan.org.uk/documents/aboutus/newsroom/physicalactivityreport.pdf. Accessed 02 Mar 2018
- 28.Cantwell M, Walsh D, Furlong B et al (2018) Healthcare professionals’ knowledge and practice of physical activity promotion in cancer care: challenges and solution. Eur J Cancer Care 27(2):e12795Google Scholar
- 30.Queen M, Karatzaferi C, Bloxham SR et al (2016) How can physical activity referral rates for breast cancer patients be increased? Front Oncol 12(6):198Google Scholar
- 31.The Health and Social Care Information Centre (2009) Health survey for England 2008: physical activity and fitness. NHS - Health and Social Care Information Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 42.Moreton R, Stutz R, Robinson S, Mulla M, Winter M, Roberts J, Hillsdon M (2017) Evaluation of the Macmillan physical activity behaviour change care pathway. Final report 2017. Leicester, CFE ResearchGoogle Scholar
- 43.Swartz MC, Lewis ZH, Lyons EJ, Jennings K, Middleton A, Deer RR, Arnold D, Dresser K, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS (2017) Effect of home- and community-based physical activity interventions on physical function among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 98:1652–1665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar