Skip to main content

Convergent priorities and tensions: a qualitative study of the integration of complementary and alternative therapies with conventional cancer treatment

Supportive Care in Cancer volume 26, pages 1791–1797 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Demand for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is high among cancer patients. This, alongside growing evidence for the efficacy of some CAM therapies, is driving change within cancer centres, where evidence-based CAM therapies are increasingly provided alongside standard cancer treatments. In Australia, commitment to equitable access to healthcare is strong, and some cancer centres are now providing integrative services at no cost to the patient. This represents a significant shift in healthcare provision. This study aimed to examine health professional and patient dynamics in an integrated cancer service where CAM is provided at no cost to patients alongside standard cancer treatments. It specifically sought to understand what might drive or hinder further integration of CAM with standard treatment in the cancer context.

Methods

Qualitative interviews were undertaken with twenty key stakeholders—cancer patients, cancer nurses, and oncologists—who were delivering or receiving care in an Australian public hospital where acupuncture services are provided at no cost to patients alongside standard chemotherapy and radiation treatments.

Results

Findings point to key areas where the concerns and priorities of cancer patients, cancer nurses, and oncologists converge and diverge in ways that reflect core personal and professional interests regarding patient care needs, the evidence base for CAM efficacy and safety, and rising healthcare costs.

Conclusions

Understanding points of convergence and divergence could assist clinicians and service providers in negotiating ways forward for integrative cancer services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. MacLennan AH, Myers SP, Taylor AW (2006) The continuing use of complementary and alternative medicine in South Australia: costs and beliefs in 2004. Med J Aust 184(1):27–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frenkel M, Cohen L, Peterson N, Palmer JL, Swint K, Bruera E (2010) Integrative medicine consultation service in a comprehensive cancer center: findings and outcomes. Integr Cancer Ther 9(3):276–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735410378663

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer FH, Lewith G, Witt CM, Linde K, von Ammon K, Cardini F, Falkenberg T, Fønnebø V, Johannessen H, Reiter B, Uehleke B, Weidenhammer W, Brinkhaus B (2014) High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complement Altern Med 14(1):46–46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-46

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Geffen JR (2010) Integrative oncology for the whole person: a multidimensional approach to cancer care. Integr Cancer Ther 9(1):105–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735409355172

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leach MJ (2006) Integrative health care: a need for change? J Complement Integr Med 3(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Posadzki P, Moon TW, Choi TY, Park TY, Lee MS, Ernst E (2013) Acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Support Care Cancer 21(7):2067–2073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1765-z

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh B, Kimble B, Costa DSJ, Davis E, McLean A, Orme K, Beith J (2013) Acupuncture for treatment of arthralgia secondary to aromatase inhibitor therapy in women with early breast cancer: pilot study. Acupunct Med 31(3):264–271. https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2012-010309

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paley CA et al (2012) Acupuncture for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6

  9. Nystrom E, Ridderstrom G, Leffler A-S (2008) Manual acupuncture as an adjunctive treatment of nausea in patients with cancer in palliative care—a prospective, observational pilot study. Acupunct Med 26(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/aim.26.1.27

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dean-Clower E, Doherty-Gilman AM, Keshaviah A, Baker F, Kaw C, Weidong Lu, Manola J, Penson RT, Matulonis UA, Rosenthal DS (2010) Acupuncture as palliative therapy for physical symptoms and quality of life for advanced cancer patients. Integr Cancer Ther 9(2):158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735409360666

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Broom A, Tovey P (2007) Therapeutic pluralism? Evidence, power and legitimacy in UK cancer services. Sociol Health Illn 29(4):551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01002.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams J (2003) The positive gains of integration: a qualitative study of GPs’ perceptions of their complementary practice. Prim Health Care Res Dev 4(02):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423603pc133oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Längler A et al (2013) Attitudes and beliefs of paediatric oncologists regarding complementary and alternative therapies. Complement Ther Med 21(Suppl 1):S10–S19

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weeks L, Seely D, DeGrasse C, Verma S, Boon H, Verhoef M, Stacey D (2014) Developing an operational model for an integrative oncology program: a qualitative descriptive feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 22(3):731–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2028-8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tovey P, Broom A (2007) Oncologists’ and specialist cancer nurses’ approaches to complementary and alternative medicine and their impact on patient action. Soc Sci Med 64(12):2550–2564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.010

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gachoud D, Albert M, Kuper A, Stroud L, Reeves S (2012) Meanings and perceptions of patient-centeredness in social work, nursing and medicine: a comparative study. J Interprof Care 26(6):484–490. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2012.717553

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shanahan C, de Lorimier R (2014) Targeted use of complementary medicines: potential health outcomes and cost savings in Australia. Frost & Sullivan (Australia) Pty. Ltd., Sydney, p 116

    Google Scholar 

  18. Furzer B et al (2014) Positive patient experiences in an Australian integrative oncology centre. BMC Complement Altern Med 14(158):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Teutsch S, Rechel B (2012) Ethics of resource allocation and rationing medical care in a time of fiscal restraint—US and Europe. Public Health Rev 34(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Broom A, Adams J (2009) Oncology clinicians’ accounts of discussing complementary and alternative medicine with their patients. Health 13(3):317–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459308101806

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J (1997) Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health 20(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24(2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J (2003) ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, Zeitz K (2013) What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs 69(1):4–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG (2005) Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.009

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lim E et al (2017) Comparison of integrative medicine centers in the USA and Germany: a mixed method study. Support Care Cancer 25(6):1865–1872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3590-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCormack B, McCance T (2010) Person-centred nursing: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Smithson J, Paterson C, Britten N, Evans M, Lewith G (2010) Cancer patients’ experiences of using complementary therapies: polarization and integration. J Health Serv Res Policy 15(suppl 2):54–61. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009104

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Broom A, Adams J, Tovey P (2009) Evidence-based healthcare in practice: a study of clinician resistance, professional de-skilling, and inter-specialty differentiation in oncology. Soc Sci Med 68(1):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.022

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waring J (2007) Adaptive regulation or governmentality: patient safety and the changing regulation of medicine. Sociol Health Illn 29(2):163–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00527.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shuval JT, Mizrachi N, Smetannikov E (2002) Entering the well-guarded fortress: alternative practitioners in hospital settings. Soc Sci Med 55(10):1745–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00305-7

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McClellan M, Kent J, Beales SJ, Cohen SIA, Macdonnell M, Thoumi A, Abdulmalik M, Darzi A (2014) Accountable care around the world: a framework to guide reform strategies. Health Aff 33(9):1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yardley L (2015) In: Smith JA (ed) Demonstrating validity in qualitative research, in qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. Sage, London, pp 235–251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. M02, Sydney Nursing School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Jo River & Heather McKenzie

  2. Cancer Centre, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, 119 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, Australia

    David Levy

  3. Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Level 1c, ASB, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

    Nick Pavlakis, Michael Back & Byeongsang Oh

Authors
  1. Jo River
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather McKenzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nick Pavlakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Back
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Byeongsang Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo River.

Ethics declarations

Primary data for this study is held with authors named on the Human Research Ethics Approval. Data cannot be reviewed externally for ethical reasons—qualitative interview transcripts indicate the personal views of participants (cancer centre staff and patients), who might be identifiable in the original data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

River, J., McKenzie, H., Levy, D. et al. Convergent priorities and tensions: a qualitative study of the integration of complementary and alternative therapies with conventional cancer treatment. Support Care Cancer 26, 1791–1797 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-4021-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-4021-0

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Supportive care
  • Integrative medicine
  • Complementary and alternative medicine