‘We’re completely back to normal, but I’d say it’s a new normal’: a qualitative exploration of adaptive functioning in rural families following a parental cancer diagnosis
- 413 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to explore rural families’ functioning following a parental cancer diagnosis.
Ten families in which a parent of dependent children had received a cancer diagnosis were purposively sampled using two questionnaires based upon the Resiliency Model of Family Adjustment and Adaptation (RMFAA): the Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scales (F-COPES) and the Family Attachment Changeability Index 8 (FACI8). The total participant number was 34, which comprised the involvement of 17 parents and 17 children. The use of questionnaires ensured representation from both high and low functioning families. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured family interviews, and thematic analysis was used.
Families identified three key challenges that are not accounted for by the RMFAA and may be unique to the rural cancer patient experience: frequent travel, increased work/financial demands and family separation. Families also described a number of protective factors that enabled them to cope with the demands of the cancer diagnosis, some of which were specific to rural families, while others may apply to Australian families more broadly. Many of these protective factors aligned with the RMFAA framework.
The findings suggest that rural families’ ability and willingness to access external resources, including informal community support and formal support services, are influenced by the strength of their internal protective factors. This result has practical implications for the development of interventions that accommodate the specific supportive care needs of rural families affected by cancer.
KeywordsCancer Family functioning Rural Psychosocial
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree for Supportive Care in Cancer to review the data if desired.
- 14.McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA (1996) Family assessment: resiliency, coping and adaptation—inventories for research and practice. University of Wisconsin Publishers, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- 15.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2004) Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Retrieved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442467589
- 17.Hayes N (1997) Theory-led thematic analysis: social identification in small companies. In: Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Psychology Press, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
- 22.Forrest G, Plumb C, Ziebland S, Stein A (2009) Breast cancer in young families: a qualitative interview study of fathers and their role and communication with their children following the diagnosis of maternal breast cancer. Psychooncology 18(1):96–103. doi: 10.1002/pon.1387 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Weber JG (2010) The typology model of family adjustment and adaptation. In: Individual and family stress and crises. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 145–171Google Scholar