Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1993–2007 | Cite as

Exploration of return-to-work interventions for breast cancer patients: a scoping review

  • Karine Bilodeau
  • Dominique Tremblay
  • Marie-José Durand
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

Many women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) would like to return to work after undergoing cancer treatment. This review explores the nature of interventions addressing return to work (RTW) for this population.

Method

A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A search was conducted in five bibliographic databases from 2005 to 2015 to identify intervention studies. Article selection and characterization were performed by two reviewers using systematic grids. Themes were identified to construct a narrative summary of the existing literature.

Results

The literature search identified 17 articles published between 2005 and 2015. The interventions (n = 16) vary in terms of objectives, methodology, description of intervention activities, and period of deployment. Only one intervention referred to a theory linked to RTW. The results further show that nearly 44% of the interventions found provided only information on RTW (information booklet, individual meeting, group session). Only 38% of the interventions were work-directed and offered other activities, such as coordination of services and information, as well as instructions for drawing up an RTW plan. More than 80% of the interventions were provided by health care professionals. Interventions took place during the survivorship period (75%), at the hospital (44%), or an external rehabilitation center (38%).

Conclusion

The variability of interventions found indicates the need to clarify the concept of RTW after a BC diagnosis. Recommendations are made for the development of multicomponent interventions that include both the clinic and the workplace to meet the particular needs of this population.

Keywords

Intervention Return to work Breast cancer Cancer survivors Scoping review 

References

  1. 1.
    De Santis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A (2014) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(4):252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chasen MR, Jacobsen PB (2011) Rehabilitation in cancer. In: Olver IN (ed) The MASCC textbook of cancer supportive care and survivorship. Springer, New York, pp 389–398. doi: 10.1007/978-4419-1225-1
  3. 3.
    Knobf MT (2015) The transition experience to breast cancer survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs 31:178–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nachreiner N, Dagher R, McGovern P, Baker B, Alexander B, Gerberich S (2007) Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN J 55(290):295Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasmussen DM, Elverdam B (2008) The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview study. Psycho-Oncology 17(12):1232–1238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morrison TL, Thomas RL (2014) Survivors’ experiences of return to work following cancer: A photovoice study: Expériences vécues par des survivantes à un cancer face à leur retour au travail : Une étude photovoice. Can J Occup Ther. doi:10.1177/0008417414534398 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wells M, Williams B, Firnigl D, Lang H, Coyle J, Kroll T, MacGillivray S (2013) Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psycho-Oncology 22(6):1208–1219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dorland H, Abma F, Roelen C, Smink J, Ranchor A, Bültmann U (2016) Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer 24(1):261–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stergiou-Kita M, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, Milosevic E, Hebert D, Phan S, Jones J (2014) Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. Journal of Cancer Survivorship:1–14Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knott V, Zrim S, Shanahan EM, Anastassiadis P, Lawn S, Kichenadasse G, Sukumaran S, Karapetis C, Koczwara B (2014) Returning to work following curative chemotherapy: a qualitative study of return to work barriers and preferences for intervention. Support Care Cancer 22(12):3263–3273. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2324-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tiedtke C, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Donceel P, de Rijk A (2015) Workplace support after breast cancer treatment: recognition of vulnerability. Disabil Rehabil 37(19):1770–1776. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.982830 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoving J, Broekhuizen M, Frings-Dresen M (2009) Return to work of breast cancer survivors: a systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer 9(1):117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Boer A, Taskila T, Tamminga S, Frings-Dresen M, Feuerstein M, Verbeek J (2015) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007569.pub3
  14. 14.
    Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riva JJ, Malik K, Burnie SJ, Endicott AR, Busse JW (2012) What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. J Can Chiropr Assoc 56(3):167–171PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldhirsch A, Glick J, Gelber R, Coates A, Thürlimann B, Senn H-J (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16(10):1569–1583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M (2014) Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348:g1687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bertheussen GF, Kaasa S, Hokstad A, Sandmæl JA, Helbostad JL, Salvesen Ø, Oldervoll LM (2012) Feasibility and changes in symptoms and functioning following inpatient cancer rehabilitation. Acta Oncol 51(8):1070–1080. doi:10.3109/0284186x.2012.699684
  20. 20.
    Cimprich B, Janz NK, Northouse L, Wren PA, Given B, Given CW (2005) Taking charge: a self-management program for women following breast cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology 14(9):704–717. doi:10.1002/pon.891
  21. 21.
    Mullan F (1985) Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med 313(4):270–273Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Groeneveld IF, de Boer AGEM, Frings-Dresen MHW (2013) Physical exercise and return to work: cancer survivors’ experiences. J Cancer Surviv 7(2):237–246. doi:10.1007/s11764-012-0264-4
  24. 24.
    De Backer IC, Van Breda E, Vreugdenhil A, Nijziel MR, Kester AD, Schep G (2007) High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivors. Acta Oncol 46(8):1143–1151. doi:10.1080/02841860701418838
  25. 25.
    Hauken MA, Holsen I, Fismen E, Bogsnes Larsen TM (2015) Working toward a good life as a cancer survivor: a longitudinal study on positive health outcomes of a rehabilitation program for young adult cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs 38(1):3–15. doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000138
  26. 26.
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM (2001) Framework PEACE: an organizational model for examining physical exercise across the cancer experience. Ann Behav Med 23(4):263–272Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Leigh S, Ly J, Gulasekaram P (1995) Quality of life in long-term cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum, 22:915–922Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hegel MT, Lyons KD, Hull JG, Kaufman P, Urquhart L, Li Z, Ahles TA (2011) Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of a telephone-delivered problem-solving-occupational therapy intervention to reduce participation restrictions in rural breast cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy. Psycho-Oncology 20(10):1092–1101. doi:10.1002/pon.1830
  29. 29.
    Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L (1996) The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther 63(1):9–23Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Jayasena R, Tsai WY, Neugut AI, Crew KD (2013) Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138(3):795–806. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1
  31. 31.
    Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JMM, Kyle RG (2013) Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials 14(1). doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-175
  32. 32.
    Khan F, Amatya B, Pallant JF, Rajapaksa I, Brand C (2012) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation in women following breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 44(9):788–794. doi:10.2340/16501977-1020
  33. 33.
    Korstjens I, Mesters I, Van Der Peet E, Gijsen B, Van Den Borne B (2006) Quality of life of cancer survivors after physical and psychosocial rehabilitation. Eur J Cancer Prev 15(6):541–547. doi:10.1097/01.cej.0000220625.77857.95
  34. 34.
    Vlaeyen J, Smeets R, Mulder H, Pelt R, Bakker-Boerrigter A (1993) Secondary prevention of chronic low back pain: a behavior-oriented approach. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 137(31):1544–1549Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyons KD, Hull JG, Kaufman PA, Li Z, Seville JL, Ahles TA, Kornblith AB, Hegel MT (2015) Development and initial evaluation of a telephone-delivered, behavioral activation, and problem-solving treatment program to address functional goals of breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol 33(2):199–218. doi:10.1080/07347332.2014.1002659
  36. 36.
    Mehnert A, Koch U (2013) Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39(1):76–87. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meneses KD, McNees P, Loerzel VW, Su X, Zhang Y, Hassey LA (2007) Transition from treatment to survivorship: effects of a psychoeducational intervention on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(5):1007–1016. doi:10.1188/07.onf.1007-1016
  38. 38.
    Meneses K, McNees P, Azuero A, Loerzel VW, Su X, Hassey LA (2009) Preliminary evaluation of psychoeducational support interventions on quality of life in rural breast cancer survivors after primary treatment. Cancer Nurs 32(5):385–397. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181a850e6
  39. 39.
    Dow KH, FerrellBR, Leigh S, Ly J, Gulasekaram P (1996) An evaluation of the quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 39(3):261–273Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ferrell B, Dow KH, Grant M (1995) Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 4(6):523–531Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bos-Ransdorp B, Uitterhoeve LLJ, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHA (2006) Enhanced provider communication and patient education regarding return to work in cancer survivors following curative treatment: a pilot study. J Occup Rehabil 16(4):647–657Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Siegert R, Taylor W (2004) Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 26:1–8Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rottmann N, Dalton SO, Bidstrup PE, Würtzen H, Høybye MT, Ross L, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Hansen DG, Johansen C (2012) No improvement in distress and quality of life following psychosocial cancer rehabilitation. A randomised trial. Psycho-Oncology 21(5):505–514. doi:10.1002/pon.1924
  44. 44.
    Tamminga SJ, Verbeek JHAM, Bos MMEM, Fons G, Kitzen JJEM, Plaisier PW, Frings-Dresen MHW, de Boer AGEM (2013) Effectiveness of a hospital-based work support intervention for female cancer patients—a multi-Centre randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 8(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063271
  45. 45.
    Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS (2006) Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24(32):5117–5124Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thijs K, Boer A, Vreugdenhil G, Wouw A, Houterman S, Schep G (2012) Rehabilitation using high-intensity physical training and long-term return-to-work in cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil 22(2):220–229. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9341-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hewitt M, Ganz PA (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor—lost in transition: an American Society of Clinical Oncology and Institute of Medicine Symposium. The National Academies Press, WashingtionGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Porteus NL (2012) La construction du modèle logique d’un programme. In: Ridde V, Dagenais C (eds) Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programme. Presses universitaires de Montréal, Montreal, pp. 89–107Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 337:a1655CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M (2008) From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol 57(4):660–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pawson R, Tilley N (1997) Realistic evaluation. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ (2007) Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 17(2):327–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK (2014) Models of cancer survivorship care: overview and summary of current evidence. J Oncol Pract:JOP. 2014.001403Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Noeres D, Park-Simon TW, Grabow J, Sperlich S, Koch-Gießelmann H, Jaunzeme J, Geyer S (2013) Return to work after treatment for primary breast cancer over a 6-year period: results from a prospective study comparing patients with the general population. Support Care Cancer 21(7):1901–1909. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1739-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Crist P (2013) Functional challenges among late effects cancer survivors: a preliminary report on work engagement issues. Work: A J Prev Assess Rehabil 46(4):369–379Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Carlsen K, Jensen AJ, Rugulies R, Christensen J, Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, Huitfeldt Madsen IE, Dalton SO (2013) Self-reported work ability in long-term breast cancer survivors. A population-based questionnaire study in Denmark. Acta Oncol 52(2):423–429. doi:10.3109/0284186x.2012.744877 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Blinder V, Patil S, Eberle C, Griggs J, Maly RC (2013) Early predictors of not returning to work in low-income breast cancer survivors: a 5-year longitudinal study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 140(2):407–416. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2625-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suit. J Manag 23(3):239–290Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L (2008) Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manag 34(3):410–476Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Poole MS, Real K (2003) Handbook of health communication: groups and teams in healthcare: communication and effectiveness. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Borras JM, Albreht T, Audisio R, Briers E, Casali P, Esperou H, Grube B, Hamoir M, Henning G, Kelly J (2014) Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer 50(3):475–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gagliardi AR, Dobrow MJ, Wright FC (2011) How can we improve cancer care? A review of interprofessional collaboration models and their use in clinical management. Surg Oncol 20(3):146–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Silver JK, Baima J, Newman R, Galantino ML, Shockney LD (2013) Cancer rehabilitation may improve function in survivors and decrease the economic burden of cancer to individuals and society. Work: A J Prev Assess Rehabil 46(4):455–472Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Loisel P (2011) Work disability: it is not just the “lesion”. In: Feuerstein M (ed) Work and cancer survivors. Springer, New York, pp. 93–103Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Shaw W, Q-n H, Pransky G, Loisel P (2008) A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil 18(1):2–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J (2005) Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):607–631. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Mousavi SM, Guyatt GH, Busse JW, Kunz R (2015) Return to work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011618
  68. 68.
    Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V (2014) A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work 48(4):579–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O’Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D (2015) Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council Guidance. BMJ 350:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karine Bilodeau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dominique Tremblay
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marie-José Durand
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  2. 2.Hôpital Charles-LeMoyne Research CenterLongueuilCanada
  3. 3.School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  4. 4.Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, School of RehabilitationUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada

Personalised recommendations